
magius wrote:interesting article. i wont deny tp played great, but td is the reason san antonio is san antonio. i don't understand why anyone would think that tp was more valuable than td. this case is similar to when maxwell (btw, is he in the hof?) won the finals mvp over bird in 81, and to me inexplicable. In the end, who cares, he won, he has 3 other final mvps, but I just think the trophy went the wrong person. people say tp controlled the pace, not true, look at the scores, td controlled the pace, td is the reason lebron had minimal effect in the paint, td is the one drawing the doubles and triples and pushing it back out.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs2 ... id=2905018
Andrew wrote:magius wrote:interesting article. i wont deny tp played great, but td is the reason san antonio is san antonio. i don't understand why anyone would think that tp was more valuable than td. this case is similar to when maxwell (btw, is he in the hof?) won the finals mvp over bird in 81, and to me inexplicable. In the end, who cares, he won, he has 3 other final mvps, but I just think the trophy went the wrong person. people say tp controlled the pace, not true, look at the scores, td controlled the pace, td is the reason lebron had minimal effect in the paint, td is the one drawing the doubles and triples and pushing it back out.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs2 ... id=2905018
I guess it was simply about acknowledging that Parker had a great series against the Cavs more than downplaying Duncan's importance to the Spurs though that line of thinking does snub Duncan, albeit unintentionally.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests