Al Harrington deals...

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Al Harrington deals...

Postby TRUball on Sun Aug 20, 2006 4:58 pm

Hawks trade options

• 1. Do a sign-and-trade with the Lakers for Chris Mihm, Aaron McKie, Brian Cook and a future draft pick.

Mihm is making $4.2 million this season, McKie $2.5 million and Cook just $1.5 million. All three are in contract years, meaning the Hawks would have the option of re-signing them if they fit in well with their young talent or letting them move on at season's end. The draft pick is the cherry on top.

• 2. Do a sign-and-trade with the Nuggets for Joe Smith, a future first-round pick and $3 million in cash.

Smith is another solid veteran power forward in a contract year. He'll make $6.8 million this season. The $3 million essentially cuts his salary in half, and the Hawks still get the draft pick they covet.

• 3. Sign-and-trade Harrington and send him to Golden State for Mickael Pietrus, Zarko Cabarkapa, Andris Bierdins and a future draft pick.

Convincing a team to give up three young and relatively inexpensive talents, all three in contract years, and a draft pick would be the steal of the century for the Hawks. But if the Warriors are as eager to get their hands on Harrington as has been rumored, maybe itճ more than just a pipe dream. Pietrus ($2.5 million) Cabarkapa ($2.1) and Bierdins ($1.9) would fortify the Hawksՠroster at three different positions (small forward, power forward and center) without busting the budget. The draft pick is gravy.


-from http://www.ajc.com/sports/content/sports/hawks/stories/0820nbainsider.html
User avatar
TRUball
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:05 am

Postby nets4life on Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:23 pm

no.3 is the best for atlanta but theyr all pretty shit
Image
User avatar
nets4life
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Postby Fitzy on Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:17 pm

i think they are all pretty crap to, what about the nets, did they lose interest in him?
User avatar
Fitzy
 
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:37 am
Location: Horsham, Victoria, Australia

Postby funk99 on Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:51 pm

no3 is the best and i think atlanta will opt for that one. unless something weird happns
User avatar
funk99
 
Posts: 1371
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:03 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby olajuwon34 on Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:33 am

NO1 will work because Behind Lamar, You-Kno-Who Needs help scoring and you cant alyways rely on Smush and Sasha and Kwame to give u great games.

You need another consistenet scorer
HAKEEM THE DREAM
THE LEGEAND

WHen I get NBA LIVE 07, I am going to change his Number to 8
olajuwon34
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:37 am

Postby olajuwon34 on Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:33 am

NO1 will work because Behind Lamar, You-Kno-Who Needs help scoring and you cant alyways rely on Smush and Sasha and Kwame to give u great games.

You need another consistenet scorer
HAKEEM THE DREAM
THE LEGEAND

WHen I get NBA LIVE 07, I am going to change his Number to 8
olajuwon34
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:37 am

Postby olajuwon34 on Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:37 am

NO1 will work because Behind Lamar, You-Kno-Who Needs help scoring and you cant alyways rely on Smush and Sasha and Kwame to give u great games.

You need another consistenet scorer :mrgreen:
HAKEEM THE DREAM
THE LEGEAND

WHen I get NBA LIVE 07, I am going to change his Number to 8
olajuwon34
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:37 am

Postby jerry on Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:27 am

fuckin triple post. besides this is for atlanta, we're not talking about what the lakers need we are talking about which is the best deal for atlanta.
Image
JaoSming is my hero.
User avatar
jerry
 
Posts: 1368
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Canada

Postby -Young Buck- on Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:31 am

Why are they trading him again? Does Harrington want out?
Image
User avatar
-Young Buck-
 
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 6:00 am

Postby Anthony15 on Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:06 am

Well for a Nuggets supporter I prefer #2, Smith is quite old and we already got a bunch of big men, if we get Al Harrington then that means that K-Mart is definately out of Denver(damn I cant wait til the day he gets traded!)
Image
User avatar
Anthony15
 
Posts: 4823
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 10:15 am
Location: Denver, Colorado

Postby Mayerhendrix on Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:38 am

Fitzy wrote:i think they are all pretty crap to, what about the nets, did they lose interest in him?


Probably wouldn't work for the Nets much, they've got RJ doing a solid job at small forward and they need a defensive minded big man more than a scorer.
Image
User avatar
Mayerhendrix
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:50 pm

Postby alexboom on Mon Aug 21, 2006 6:34 am

The Hawks could make a steal with the 3rd option, but I'd say that the Warriors would be stupid to accept such a trade. Let's face it: Harrington is a good player, but will never become a superstar. With his new contract he will certainly get overpaid being a burden in the salary cap.

On the opposite side, Pietrus and mostly Biedrins have the potential to become big players in this league at no risk for the Hawks (if they fail they simply won't be resigned). Cabarkapa is still a relatively young player who could turn into an interesting post player. And I won't even mention the draft pick.
User avatar
alexboom
 
Posts: 2237
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 2:47 am
Location: France

Postby maes on Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:01 am

Why would any team give up that many assets (3 players in the regular rotation + 1st round draft pick?!?!) for a guy that can just walk out Atlanta's door without the Hawks being able to do single thing about it?

The only thing ATL of value ATL is trading is the ability to sign AL to a big contract so he can go to a team without cap space. Al is a free man, he's not Hawks property.

I think all 3 of these trades are ludicrous.
maes
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:58 am
Location: Chicago

Postby Silas on Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:25 am

I'm suprised they'd (golden state) would be so quick to ship off Beadriens.

I like him, aside from the fact that he looks astonishingly like johnny knoxeville, and that he's pals with my latvian friend, he seems like he's a solid player with a lot of potential. Anyhow, I guess they'd be more quick to give up on him since they just drafted O'Bryant.
User avatar
Silas
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 6:14 am
Location: Seattle Area

Postby kinokong on Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:45 pm

no3 is just plain crap.... too much talent given away.... no1 is probably the most reasonable
PPL r a little feisty these days:D
kinokong
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 4:09 pm
Location: Home Baby Home

Postby Its_asdf on Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:56 pm

The third option is a straight up robbery. Pietrus AND Biedrins? I thought the Warriors staff were expecting some big things from these players in the future, especially Biedrins.
User avatar
Its_asdf
I'm kind of a big deal.
 
Posts: 5462
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Under a Rock in Canada

Postby nets4life on Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:14 pm

he'll probably go to a team not mentioned in the list for a couple of 1st rounders
Image
User avatar
nets4life
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Postby CERVANTES on Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:43 pm

I hope he ends up in New Jersey. :D
If we were able to "sign" Shareef I think we can sign Harrington.
Image
User avatar
CERVANTES
 
Posts: 772
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:26 am
Location: La Soleada España

Postby kinokong on Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:31 pm

lol no way harrington turns down 5-6 more million dollars.... the only reason the nets were able to get adbul-rahim is because he was available for the mid-level and because he failed the kings physical.....
PPL r a little feisty these days:D
kinokong
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 4:09 pm
Location: Home Baby Home

Postby Keo on Tue Aug 22, 2006 12:51 am

The third option for sure. It's three young players, two of them being promising, and a draft pick. Can't go wrong with that.
User avatar
Keo
 
Posts: 3241
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:36 pm
Location: Canada

Postby -Young Buck- on Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:14 am

Now there is a new trade in the mix.

According to two league sources, the Warriors have revived discussions with three teams on a multiple-player swap, with the principal parts involving Mike Dunleavy Jr. going to the Clippers, Corey Maggette to Denver and Joe Smith to Atlanta, with the Warriors getting Harrington. San Francisco Chronicle


Man, i dont know what the clippers are thinking. Mike D isnt THAT good.
Image
User avatar
-Young Buck-
 
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 6:00 am

Postby ThaLiveKing on Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:48 am

OOHHHHHH YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!

http://www.nba.com/pacers/news/walsh_ha ... 60821.html

Walsh Says Harrington
Deal Still On Table
By Conrad Brunner
Aug. 21, 2006


The Pacers are still very much involved in discussions about a possible sign-and-trade deal for Atlanta forward Al Harrington, franchise CEO & President Donnie Walsh said today.
Weekend media reports suggested ownership had stepped in to squelch the deal, leading the Hawks to re-open trade discussions with other teams.

"I think we're coming down to it and we'll either get it or we won't," said Walsh. "It's a negotiation – in terms of the trade, in terms of the (contract). We've been negotiating and that takes time. Usually, the press doesn't get wind of that until it gets toward the end. But here it seems like they were in it before we had any understanding we could do a trade with Atlanta and then (reported) definitely that the deal was done or that it was imminent before we even talked to Al's people. You have to understand, there was also a change of agents in all this, so that took some time, too.

"I think it's business as usual, myself. It's gone the way every deal goes for me."

Walsh said co-owners Herb and Melvin Simon have been involved in the discussions, but that has been the norm throughout his career. The difference in this case, he said, has been the public nature of the trade negotiations through ongoing newspaper accounts in Atlanta and Indianapolis.

"The owners always get involved. The owners were involved from day one," he said. "If you think you're giving out $20-40 million packages without getting in touch with the owner, you're crazy. (Herb Simon)'s involvement has always been helpful to me. Look, this guy has made some great deals in his life, so he always brings a wrinkle in that's useful.

"I think he's in support of the deal but within the parameters."

The framework for the deal is in place, Walsh said. What remains is to work out the details of Harrington's contract.

"There have been three stages to this," Walsh said. "The first stage was where there were a lot of teams trying to trade for Al, we had the exception but it looked like they could get more money if they went in different directions so we weren't as involved then. When that got over with and those trades didn't go down, then they started focusing on us. But then we had to deal with Atlanta as to what it would take to make this trade. So that was a negotiation, and that took time.

"We got to the point last week where we kind of understand each other and now we're dealing with Al. It's that simple."

While not divulging details of the negotiations, Walsh said media reports of a 6-year, $57 million deal are little more than supposition based on the Pacers' $7.5 million trade exception. Those figures were reported before Walsh had entered into negotiations with Tellem, which began in earnest last week. Harrington fired his previous agent during the trade talks and hired Tellem, who was required by league rules to wait two weeks before assuming his role as the forward's official representative.

"You're going through stages where the press seems to have things, I think from the players and the agents, because it's in their interest to kind of put it out there," he said. "I know this: we haven't made any statements, and I'm talking about me, Herb and Larry (Bird).

"I just think there's been a lot of misinformation about where this deal was and a lot of suppositions. People had the deal negotiated before we even talked about it. It was pretty easy to look at our exception and say, 'Oh, it's going to be $57 million,' when we hadn't even talked about it yet. I read last week the deal was imminent. Who's telling them that?

"Deals take time. There are negotiations going on. It's no different than any deal we've done other than it's been in the press for a long time. It has not been imminent at any point, and certainly not at the point it was reported to have been imminent."

So what is the status of the deal?

Said Walsh: "It's in negotiation."
User avatar
ThaLiveKing
 
Posts: 2464
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 4:17 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby Amphatoast on Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:15 am

lol so basically this offseason has been the "Where will Al Harrington Go?" offseason.. how boring..
Amphatoast
 
Posts: 3004
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:45 am
Location: new york


Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests