Bird and Carlile see different Jasikevicius role

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Bird and Carlile see different Jasikevicius role

Postby Gedas on Tue May 16, 2006 11:04 pm

L. Bird in recent comments, said that Carlile doesn't use Jasikevicius. He said, that Jasikevicius IS NOT a shooting guard and shoudn't play that position. he also said, that he is trully much better than this season showed and deserves alot more playing time than he gets now. He also said that there will be many huge changes on the team, that the team played very selfishly and therefore Saras wasn't able to show his abilities. He said that things will be changes and he will make big changes this offseason. (i've only seen this interview in Lithuanian, I haven't saw the oriniginal english version).
Last edited by Gedas on Wed May 17, 2006 2:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Gedas
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:38 am
Location: Lithuania

Postby Matthew on Tue May 16, 2006 11:46 pm

Interesting. Rick Carlisle is a solid coach but he wont win this battle against Larry Bird.
User avatar
Matthew
 
Posts: 5812
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 7:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Andreas Dahl on Wed May 17, 2006 12:33 am

I would love to see Sarunas get to strut his stuff much more than he was this season, and he is a great player and all, but I can't help but wonder if Larry is having a little too much confidence in him or if he actually does know what's better for the team. As Matthew said, Rick is a very good coach and I'm fairly sure there's a solid reason why he didn't play him as much and/or in his natural position. It's probably not because Sarunas isn't a good enough player, but Rick probably thinks the team is better off playing him like they have; and he might be right, which is why I'm not sure about Larry trying to force the issue too much.
It's a bit of a gamble; they could either continue to play like they have been and get good results in doing so. But they could also try to get Sarunas more into it all, which could go either way really. I'd go with the later (at least to start with, and you'll still be able to get back in case it doesn't work out), but it'll be real interesting to see how it'll pan out..
Image
User avatar
Andreas Dahl
 
Posts: 5970
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 10:04 pm
Location: Växjö, Sweden

Postby _marsal on Wed May 17, 2006 1:19 am

I'm on Larry's side. Totally. Saras is NO SG.
User avatar
_marsal
 
Posts: 347
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:11 am
Location: Slovenia

Postby Matt on Wed May 17, 2006 2:14 am

He's also no PG....he can't create for himself or anyone else. He should be a 3rd string PG on any good playoff team.

I don't think Carlisle should be forced to play him more.....this isn't some young guy with a shit load of potential we are talking about, this is a 30yr old with a future of 5yrs max.
Image
User avatar
Matt
 
Posts: 7236
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:48 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Cornerthree on Wed May 17, 2006 2:49 am

Well I would say like this also, if I would have been seen only that, what he did on the NBA.
But he played a huge role in Europe.
Maybe the transition was too hard for him...
Cornerthree
 
Posts: 1787
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 9:46 pm

Postby Gedas on Wed May 17, 2006 3:20 am

Matt wrote:He's also no PG....he can't create for himself or anyone else. He should be a 3rd string PG on any good playoff team.

I don't think Carlisle should be forced to play him more.....this isn't some young guy with a shit load of potential we are talking about, this is a 30yr old with a future of 5yrs max.


Maybe I should remind you the Olimpycs? Or his glorious seasons in Europe? He can score at any time, esspecially at clutch moments. He is also a great passer, he just doesn't like when he is forced to play static basketball, he is a creator. I'm sure Bird will do what is neccesary (fire Carlile, trade Tinsley and Johnson) to make his team like he wants it to be (O'neal;Stojakovic;Saras).
Image
Gedas
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:38 am
Location: Lithuania

Postby Marquis on Wed May 17, 2006 3:33 am

I disagree with Matt, that Jasikevicius is just 3 PT shooter, but not PG. He is creator, he loves to controll the ball. But I won't be biased and will say that he is just too weak for the starting point guard position at Indiana.
Marquis
 
Posts: 1894
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Lithuania

Re: Bird and Carlile see different Jasikevicius role

Postby Indy on Wed May 17, 2006 3:50 am

Gedas wrote:He also said that there will be many huge changes on the team, that the team played very selfishly and therefore Saras wasn't able to show his abilities. He said that things will be changes and he will make big changes this offseason. (i've only seen this interview in Lithuanian, I haven't saw the oriniginal english version).


Well then I guess in Lithuanian they completely changed what Larry said to make Saras fans happy. :lol:

Larry actually said that he would be trying more to make attitude adjustments with the current players rather then have a massive overhaul. That doesn't mean what he is saying is true however. He certainly didn't say anything like this at all.
Image
User avatar
Indy
 
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:32 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: Bird and Carlile see different Jasikevicius role

Postby Cornerthree on Wed May 17, 2006 4:08 am

Indy wrote:
Gedas wrote:He also said that there will be many huge changes on the team, that the team played very selfishly and therefore Saras wasn't able to show his abilities. He said that things will be changes and he will make big changes this offseason. (i've only seen this interview in Lithuanian, I haven't saw the oriniginal english version).


Well then I guess in Lithuanian they completely changed what Larry said to make Saras fans happy. :lol:

Larry actually said that he would be trying more to make attitude adjustments with the current players rather then have a massive overhaul. That doesn't mean what he is saying is true however. He certainly didn't say anything like this at all.

Maybe he(Gedas) said what he wanted to say?
Cornerthree
 
Posts: 1787
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 9:46 pm

Re: Bird and Carlile see different Jasikevicius role

Postby Gedas on Wed May 17, 2006 4:21 am

Pursuer wrote:
Indy wrote:
Gedas wrote:He also said that there will be many huge changes on the team, that the team played very selfishly and therefore Saras wasn't able to show his abilities. He said that things will be changes and he will make big changes this offseason. (i've only seen this interview in Lithuanian, I haven't saw the oriniginal english version).


Well then I guess in Lithuanian they completely changed what Larry said to make Saras fans happy. :lol:

Larry actually said that he would be trying more to make attitude adjustments with the current players rather then have a massive overhaul. That doesn't mean what he is saying is true however. He certainly didn't say anything like this at all.

Maybe he(Gedas) said what he wanted to say?


Well, partly yes. It's hard to fid the specific word when your translating an interview from Lithuanian to English, when it was translated to Lithuanian in the first place. He did talk about Saras.
Image
Gedas
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:38 am
Location: Lithuania

Postby maes on Sat May 20, 2006 9:26 am

He's a very good passer but i don 't see him making opposing teams defense work hard to guard him and creating open opportunities for his teammates. Mainly other defenses kinda...just ignore him.

I think if he drills in some 30+ games he'll make the other teams sweat and extend the defenses a little bit. But right now, with a career high of 5 field goals, he's not on anybody's radar.
“Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.”
#23
maes
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:58 am
Location: Chicago


Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests