Take this with a grain of salt.
eisfeld wrote:Well to break it up:
KG to Chicago:
Would be nice but I don't think the Bulls can free enough salary space. A trade Chandler + Deng would not succeed as the salarys don't match at all. Also I think the Wolves may insist on involving Gordon or Hinrich in the trade.
Feel free to question everything I wrote
Riot wrote: It wouldn't make any sense for the franchise or for Garnett personally.
_marsal wrote:Riot wrote: It wouldn't make any sense for the franchise or for Garnett personally.
Not make sense for KG? He's playing for average reboulding team while in his prime and has 0% chances of winning anything with this team..I think getting traded to a better team makes perfect sense for him, don't you?
eisfeld wrote:Totally agree with SilasDC. He would be in a better situation in Chicago, L.A, Seattle or New York. But I think for him the best move would be to join the Bulls.
Sauru wrote:its my opinion that these rumors tend to start when a player says something along the lines of "if you refuse to give me a winning team then why dont you just trade me". next thing you know the player is called a crybaby or asshole or what have you and everyone in the world starts to think up possibilities of how said player can land on this team.
eisfeld wrote:@Riot
You can't look over the fact that NY has great players (besides two real cancers). And you'll never know when they start to click.
Indy wrote:Laker Socks wrote:Calm down kids, i did not make this up.
Hence, the term "rumor" andTake this with a grain of salt.
I'm still confused why you posted a link with absolutley nothing about KG in it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests