All-Rookie Teams Announced

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Postby KIG1 on Fri May 05, 2006 4:57 pm

zmac wrote:Im surprised Nate Rob and 'shad Mcants didnt get more....


Probably the voters didn't like the Knicks because they played so horrible. McCants wasn't consistent enough.
User avatar
KIG1
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

Postby Scotty on Fri May 05, 2006 8:53 pm

yeah go Bogut-he's all i care about

Felton cant make 1st team when Paul is there
Last edited by Scotty on Sat May 06, 2006 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Go Nuggets!
User avatar
Scotty
 
Posts: 2128
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Australia

Postby arrell on Fri May 05, 2006 10:32 pm

For a while (well actually, only at the end of the season), Nate Robinson was being the highest scorer for his team, so he should have more votes.
User avatar
arrell
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 11:42 am
Location: Melb, Australia

Postby Fenix on Fri May 05, 2006 11:53 pm

arrell wrote:For a while (well actually, only at the end of the season), Nate Robinson was being the highest scorer for his team, so he should have more votes.

Please, he's 5'9 and he can dunk and now every short guy roots for him like they've got something in common. So he scored a lot in a couple of games, so what. His teams is the second worst in the League and he's a complete douche who can't do anything else than score a bit and dunk. That doesn't make a player 'great'. Where does his potential lie? In his tremendous playmaking skills? In his tenacity on defense? Or is he an unselfish locker room presence who knows his role on the court?
"Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team." (Scottie Pippen, #33)
User avatar
Fenix
There's no I in threesome
 
Posts: 3015
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:32 pm
Location: Slovenia

Postby cklitsie on Sat May 06, 2006 1:12 am

Well he does have a little bit of talent, he might be an 8th man who an give some nice scoring off the bench some day, with a lot of hard work and not with the Knicks.
He only had high numbers at the end of the season because way before the all-star break the Knicks (as in: people associated to them who can think rationately) already knew they were lottery bound (except that they don't own the pick) so the games didn't matter anymore.
User avatar
cklitsie
 
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 3:02 am

Postby Its_asdf on Sat May 06, 2006 9:28 am

I'm pretty satisfied with the first team, although Deron Williams is probably the only person who wasn't a lock to make the first team.

A lot of the players on the second team are interchangeable with the people who didn't get on the team. They all played half decently and had reasons to be voted on the second team.
User avatar
Its_asdf
I'm kind of a big deal.
 
Posts: 5462
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Under a Rock in Canada

Postby The X on Sat May 06, 2006 6:29 pm

my only adjustment would be putting Felton on 1st team in favour of Deron....apart from that I have no problem with the teams....
User avatar
The X
is
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11499
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Stevesanity on Sat May 06, 2006 10:02 pm

No votes for Daniel Ewing or James Singleton :miserable:
Like quite a few I'd put Raymond Felton on the first team over Deron but other than that, its pretty alright.
Image
Signature Thanks to My Crappy Photoshop Skills :crazy:
User avatar
Stevesanity
 
Posts: 786
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:11 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby arrell on Sun May 07, 2006 12:12 am

VanK wrote:
arrell wrote:For a while (well actually, only at the end of the season), Nate Robinson was being the highest scorer for his team, so he should have more votes.

Please, he's 5'9 and he can dunk and now every short guy roots for him like they've got something in common. So he scored a lot in a couple of games, so what. His teams is the second worst in the League and he's a complete douche who can't do anything else than score a bit and dunk. That doesn't make a player 'great'. Where does his potential lie? In his tremendous playmaking skills? In his tenacity on defense? Or is he an unselfish locker room presence who knows his role on the court?


Uh, I never I said liked him. I never said he was great. All I know is that despite being the 3rd or 4th PG in his team, Nate was scoring points for his team. That's how I came up with the idea that perhaps he should have gotten some more votes.
User avatar
arrell
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 11:42 am
Location: Melb, Australia

Postby Mayerhendrix on Sun May 07, 2006 2:59 am

^ But that comes out of Larry Brown punishing his underachieving veterans by playing the younger guys for extended minutes.
Image
User avatar
Mayerhendrix
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:50 pm

Previous

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests