zmac wrote:Im surprised Nate Rob and 'shad Mcants didnt get more....
Probably the voters didn't like the Knicks because they played so horrible. McCants wasn't consistent enough.
arrell wrote:For a while (well actually, only at the end of the season), Nate Robinson was being the highest scorer for his team, so he should have more votes.
VanK wrote:arrell wrote:For a while (well actually, only at the end of the season), Nate Robinson was being the highest scorer for his team, so he should have more votes.
Please, he's 5'9 and he can dunk and now every short guy roots for him like they've got something in common. So he scored a lot in a couple of games, so what. His teams is the second worst in the League and he's a complete douche who can't do anything else than score a bit and dunk. That doesn't make a player 'great'. Where does his potential lie? In his tremendous playmaking skills? In his tenacity on defense? Or is he an unselfish locker room presence who knows his role on the court?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests