Tyson Chandler

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Postby Axel on Thu May 04, 2006 7:39 am

Ryan. wrote:
Axel wrote:
keepnitgangsta1 wrote:
Axel wrote:
keepnitgangsta1 wrote:Just because in one series hes been called for a lot of fouls doesn't mean hes a bad defender.


You're forgetting that he averaged nearly 4 fouls per game in only 26 mpg during the regular season. He was worse than Eddy Curry.


He fouls a lot so he is agressive. Still good at d.


BS. I could step on the court and foul every play, that doesnt mean its good defense. :roll:


I'm starting to think, do you watch the NBA?


Thanks for the reassurance, I was beginning to wonder.
User avatar
Axel
 
Posts: 2853
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:46 am
Location: North Carolina

Postby Scotty on Thu May 04, 2006 11:23 am

not everyone can watch the NBA-you have to have Foxtel in Australia to watch it and ESPN is an extra even if you do have Foxtel. :x
Image

Go Nuggets!
User avatar
Scotty
 
Posts: 2128
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Andrew on Thu May 04, 2006 11:57 am

Air Robinson 4 wrote:I saw Shaq fake a pass while in the paint and chandler bit on it, lol so much for good D.


Allen Iverson had a great crossover on Michael Jordan back in his rookie season. I guess that makes MJ a terrible defender. Kobe Bryant's had a couple of games shooting around 30%, I guess he's an ineffective and lousy scorer. Hakeem Olajuwon just about faked David Robinson out of his shoes on more than a couple of occasions in the 1995 Playoffs. I guess the Admiral was clueless on defense.

Sarcastic exaggerations aside, Chandler isn't amongst the best defenders in the league, no question there. But you can't base an assessment of his defense on a single play or a few games against an aging but still very physically imposing and dominant centre in Shaquille O'Neal.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115123
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Sauru on Fri May 05, 2006 8:46 am

imo, if the bulls trade chandler now they would end up regretting it within 3 years, i would hold on to him a bit longer. i dont see them getting back anything in return worth dropping tyson.
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby Air Jordon on Fri May 05, 2006 12:03 pm

Sauru wrote:imo, if the bulls trade chandler now they would end up regretting it within 3 years, i would hold on to him a bit longer. i dont see them getting back anything in return worth dropping tyson.


thats probably true, no one would give the bulls anything good, and he still has some potential. Send him to the D league, then he would average 25ppg 15rpg and 5bpg then trade him. lol
This sig was too offensive for the kids.
Air Jordon
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 2:48 pm

Postby Andrew on Fri May 05, 2006 12:07 pm

No argument here, as I said I think they should wait at least a couple more years and try to make the most out of their investment in him before giving up on him. But if he hasn't shown any improvement in a couple of years and is looking more expendable it might be for the best if they trade him before his stock drops further.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115123
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Air Jordon on Fri May 05, 2006 2:05 pm

well the bulls are in a great position, they could get the #1 draft pick, top 5 no matter what. plus they have their own draft pick, which makes 2 draft picks in the first round. None of their good players are free agents at the end of this season. So maybe they can get a guy with good size with their top pick, and best player left with the second pick. So i guess holding onto chandler now isnt that bad, he just hasnt been very productive in the heat series.
This sig was too offensive for the kids.
Air Jordon
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 2:48 pm

Postby Andrew on Fri May 05, 2006 3:34 pm

Ideally they'll be able to get someone in the draft or perhaps through free agency within the next couple of years who can give them that inside presence that they need, even if he's not a perceived franchise player. I'm not saying they should waste picks and money on scrub big men who in the end make little difference except raise the average height on the team, but with some of the players they have in place to shoulder the offensive load perhaps it won't matter if they can't grab the next great centre.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115123
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Scotty on Fri May 05, 2006 8:57 pm

Fuck for some reason i was thinking about Gordan during reading this, now i know you mean that huge 7'1' guy :lol: He's alright-as long as they dont ditch Gordan.............unless they want to trade him for K-Mart
Image

Go Nuggets!
User avatar
Scotty
 
Posts: 2128
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Air Jordon on Sat May 06, 2006 2:32 am

tripplemrox wrote:Fuck for some reason i was thinking about Gordan during reading this, now i know you mean that huge 7'1' guy :lol: He's alright-as long as they dont ditch Gordan.............unless they want to trade him for K-Mart


i doubt trading gordon for kmart would be a good move. the bulls dont need to trade anyone, just draft and sign a FA or two. I cant see them trading Gordon, Hinrich, Duhon, Deng, Nocioni, or sweetney.
This sig was too offensive for the kids.
Air Jordon
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 2:48 pm

Postby maes on Sat May 06, 2006 5:16 am

He's very athletic but not great skill-wise. He has to defend a lot with his arms, hence all the fouls. He's not great with his lower body.

He's not being used all that well w/ the Bulls as a Center, because they don't have one. Supposedly he had a good jump shot in school, out to 3 point range, but we rarely see that out of him on the Bulls. Scouts originally pegged him as more of a tall SF/PF like Jonathan Bender/Radmanovic/Tim Thomas, not a back to the basket Center. He had no post game even in high school.

It would be a shame to see him leave the Bulls, but if it ever happened it might be the best thing for his career, much like Tim Thomas.
“Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.”
#23
maes
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:58 am
Location: Chicago

Postby Axel on Sat May 06, 2006 5:50 am

Air Robinson 4 wrote:
Sauru wrote:imo, if the bulls trade chandler now they would end up regretting it within 3 years, i would hold on to him a bit longer. i dont see them getting back anything in return worth dropping tyson.


thats probably true, no one would give the bulls anything good, and he still has some potential. Send him to the D league, then he would average 25ppg 15rpg and 5bpg then trade him. lol


They can't send him to the D-League, he's been in the league for too long. There's a limit on it, I think it's 2 or 3 years.
User avatar
Axel
 
Posts: 2853
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:46 am
Location: North Carolina

Postby Its_asdf on Sat May 06, 2006 9:25 am

Well, it was either overpaying a skinny, lazy, non-offensive rebounder (Chandler) or overpaying a fat, lazy, offence-only centre who can't rebound and has potential heart problems (Curry), and the chances of acquiring a solid big man in the off-season was slim, so I guess they didn't have much of a choice.

I would like to see Chandler succeed in the NBA though, I think he just needs some confidence offensively.
User avatar
Its_asdf
I'm kind of a big deal.
 
Posts: 5462
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Under a Rock in Canada

Postby Sauru on Sat May 06, 2006 9:39 am

in hind sight, they should have traded them both while they were in thier 1st or 2nd years
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby Axel on Sat May 06, 2006 10:18 am

Its_asdf wrote:Well, it was either overpaying a skinny, lazy, non-offensive rebounder (Chandler) or overpaying a fat, lazy, offence-only centre who can't rebound and has potential heart problems (Curry), and the chances of acquiring a solid big man in the off-season was slim, so I guess they didn't have much of a choice.


Or they could have just kept Elton Brand :lol:
User avatar
Axel
 
Posts: 2853
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:46 am
Location: North Carolina

Postby Its_asdf on Sat May 06, 2006 10:21 am

But they still wouldn't have a legit centre. :P
User avatar
Its_asdf
I'm kind of a big deal.
 
Posts: 5462
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Under a Rock in Canada

Postby Silas on Sat May 06, 2006 10:55 am

they SHOULD have drafted a good center instead of jason williams, lol
User avatar
Silas
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 6:14 am
Location: Seattle Area

Postby Air Jordon on Sat May 06, 2006 1:23 pm

SilasDC wrote:they SHOULD have drafted a good center instead of jason williams, lol


well the only good "center" they could have taken was amare stoudamire who was a big question mark, or Krstic who went late first round. Other then that there werent any good centers in that draft. Of course anything would be better then jay williams now.
This sig was too offensive for the kids.
Air Jordon
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 2:48 pm

Postby Carmo on Sat May 06, 2006 1:42 pm

The bulls don't have any problems at center, they have the great man himself - Luke Schenscher! :P
Carmo
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 4:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby air gordon on Sun May 07, 2006 3:53 am

Sauru wrote:in hind sight, they should have traded them both while they were in thier 1st or 2nd years


Or they could have just kept Elton Brand Laughing

hindsight is blinding but i'll play this game and add that they should have not traded Brad Miller, let alone let Krause run.ruin the team post Bulls Dynasty :x :x :x
Jump.
Scott Skiles answer to the question on how Eddy Curry can become a better rebounder
User avatar
air gordon
 
Posts: 7867
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 4:06 pm
Location: windy city

Postby Sauru on Sun May 07, 2006 5:12 am

yeah in hindsight you can make anyone or team look foolish. for instance imagine the team my celtics would have had if we didnt spend 3 years drafting crap players. all we did was load up on picks and each year we blew them on joke players, or traded the player before giving them a real chance.
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Previous

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests