T-Wolves

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

T-Wolves

Postby T-wolves on Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:36 pm

After losing yet another game this time to the Raptors I dont know where the wolves can go from here. The wolves shot 54% or something and still managed to lose. Mike James and Claxton have put up like 27 against the wolves in consecutive games. Garnett has posted 4 straight 18+ rebound games which is about = to half the teams rebound total. Jaric and Hudson are injured and Griffen is out of the rotation for some reason. Banks has shown good signs I think he would be a good backup PG. I also think the starting lineup including Madsen and Carter isnt working. I am thinking a trade for a big man is the way to go but we also need a good PG. Would like to hear some opinions.
User avatar
T-wolves
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 9:26 pm
Location: Melb,Aus

Postby Mentally Hilarious on Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:14 pm

Well you do have Mark Bl(o)unt.

Hihi. Hoho.

And we don't.

Which is nothing short of a blessing.
Image
User avatar
Mentally Hilarious
 
Posts: 1045
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:07 am

Postby Riot on Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:40 pm

The team is just struggling to gut games out. They were the better team in the New Orleans game but Speedy Claxton and Kirk Snyder made the plays to win the game. Against Toronto, Mike James made the plays to win the game. It's tough right now but the team can turn this around and make the playoffs. They just need to come together and get a great effort every night for 48 minutes.

Garnett is having a great season, probably one of his best. The last two games he has had 19 points, 21 rebounds and 23 points, 19 rebounds. That is 21ppg and 20rpg over the last two games for him. He dominated the match-up against Chris Bosh.

Garnett knows that this is a team that is rebuilding/retooling and he said he is willing to wait it out. He wants this team to stick together and learn each other's tendencies so they can become closer on and off the court.

The team seems to struggle when the ball stops on the offense. Ricky Davis is a great player but he needs to kick the ball around a little bit. I love his post up game but he really needs to learn when he look for his shot and when to look for his teammates.

Some could say Marcus Banks was the best player the Timberwolves got in the trade with Boston. He has played great in his short time here in Minnesota and a lot of Wolves fans want Casey to start him. I wouldn't be upset with him starting, but I don't mind the Anthony Carter starting experiment, either. The only problem is he can't make a shot if his life depended on it and that hurts the offense in the long run.

So yeah, I have to head out the door now for school but that is my take on MY Timberwolves. It should be a great game tonight against division rival Seattle Sonics. The team needs to get a victory here so they can go into the all-star break with confidence.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby air2k5 on Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:25 am

I will not be surprized is KG has a heart attack... He loves the game and he wants his team to win, he is getting double double almoust every game. If T-wolves want to be good they will have to let go of KG, they simply can't be good. They do not have a good PG, nor do they have a good bench. They can get an awesome trade for KG, maybe 1 good PG and 1 good Center,.
User avatar
air2k5
 
Posts: 446
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:01 pm
Location: USA

Postby Riot on Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:28 am

Trading Garnett would send this franchise back about 10 steps.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby air2k5 on Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:41 am

Riot wrote:Trading Garnett would send this franchise back about 10 steps.

not really, KG is a superstar they can get some more then decent players for him.
User avatar
air2k5
 
Posts: 446
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:01 pm
Location: USA

Postby mark_30_112 on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:02 am

That's way out of line and just stupidity.

Why would you trade your best player and one of the best players in the game.

I think they'll make a big improvement next year.
Image“I'm just honored to play for the Jazz and to play after John Stockton, to wear the same jersey he wore and be on the same floor he was on because he's one of the best players of all-time, one of the best point guards of all-time" Derron Williams - Utah Jazz
User avatar
mark_30_112
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 3:21 pm

Postby air2k5 on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:13 am

mark_30_112 wrote:That's way out of line and just stupidity.

Why would you trade your best player and one of the best players in the game.

I think they'll make a big improvement next year.

Why? Because you can make a great trade. Lot's of teams want KG, plus they will make you a nice offer. Min can get decent starting lineup then.
User avatar
air2k5
 
Posts: 446
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:01 pm
Location: USA

Postby Riot on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:31 am

Like I said, trading Garnett would be the worse thing this franchise could do. I'll tell you why.

1. Garnett does everything on the court. He is one of the best defensive big men in the game, he can stretch the floor with his sweet stroke, he has the best footwork in the league in the post, great post moves, one of the best passers in the league, can handle the ball and he is the best rebounder in the league. So you make a trade you'll have to get all that back + more to make it worth while. He brings more to the table than 3 average players combined.

2. He means too much to the state of Minnesota. If he was to be traded Minnesotans would flip out of at the Timberwolves franchise. The attendance right now it low and if you traded Garnett it would be even worse. There might not be a team in Minnesota if the team deals Garnett.

But overall, you will not get equal value for Garnett. He is one of the best players of all time, why deal him so you can get a "starting five"? Why not just get a starting five in the off-season? They have the MLE to work and a trade exception they got in the Boston trade. Plus, Garnett has carried teams that aren't filled with much talent to the postseason before. You don't have to have a star studded lineup to get into the postseason with Garnett.

Simply put, it's a lot easier to re-tool around Garnett than it is to re-build without him. We have one of the best players of all time in his prime, why in the world would you willingly want to deal that? What do you think they could get in return? Okur and Boozer for him? No team is going to give up enough so there is no point in dealing him. He is a Timberwolf for life and that is how Garnett, Taylor and Minnesota wants it.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby air2k5 on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:38 am

Well you ar esomewhat right, but why not get 2-3 rising talents forn him? It is his 10th year, not very often players increase their talent after they reach their 10th.
User avatar
air2k5
 
Posts: 446
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:01 pm
Location: USA

Postby Num33Baller on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:46 am

air2k5 wrote:Well you ar esomewhat right, but why not get 2-3 rising talents forn him? It is his 10th year, not very often players increase their talent after they reach their 10th.


He came out of highschool dude.

Its really like hes in his 6th year.
Num33Baller
 
Posts: 588
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:27 am

Postby Riot on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:48 am

air2k5 wrote:Well you ar esomewhat right, but why not get 2-3 rising talents forn him? It is his 10th year, not very often players increase their talent after they reach their 10th.


Name a team that has 2-3 "rising talents" that would give you a better chance of winning than Kevin Garnett. Now, think for a second if that team would give those 2-3 "rising talents" to acquire Garnett. The chances are slim that the two sides agree on anything.

And I don't see the Pistons giving up Chauncey, Big Ben and Sheed anytime soon. :wink:
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby Cable on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:58 am

Now Riot has his own thread. Way to go guys :shake:
Image
And I'm going to see them in Toronto!
User avatar
Cable
 
Posts: 5078
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:31 am
Location: Burlington, Ontario

Postby Drex on Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:34 pm

He already has threads. The political ones.
Image
User avatar
Drex
You bastards!!!
 
Posts: 6074
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 10:48 am
Location: Iquique, Chile

Postby Riot on Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:49 pm

Cable Guy wrote:Now Riot has his own thread. Way to go guys :shake:


:lol: You guys are haters.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby dada on Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:54 pm

Whether it be related to basketball or politics, I dont mind reading Riot's rantings.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:02 pm

Postby Andrew on Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:23 pm

I still don't get this notion that superstars must be traded if they haven't won a championship by their x-th year in the league. Most great players have a fairly long shelf life. I suppose the main difference these days is that those players also have huge contracts which restrict free agency but still, the top players generally remain effective for a long term, their prime seems to last longer because they're at such a high level.

And as the Pacers demonstrated with Reggie Miller, it's possible to have a transitional "changing of the guard" phase without losing steam which is another option if a great player has plans on having a long career and wants to remain in town. It is possible to re-tool without blowing everything up and rebuilding. But KG's not even near that stage of his career yet so that isn't an option that will present itself for a while.

As Riot said, you're not going to get equal value for him. Throughout NBA history, there's been a group of players in each era that just can't be traded for a fair or equal return. Even if you were to trade Kobe Bryant for Tracy McGrady, KG for Tim Duncan or any other kind of fairly even looking superstar-for-superstar swap, it doesn't necessarily work out.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115124
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Nel on Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:57 pm

I agree on what charles barkley said on the tnt pregame show that minnesota should trade garnett if they won't put the right pieces around him. He's too good of a player to not have a shot in the finals. I thought when they traded with the celtics it was peirce they're getting but instead it was davis. Buckets is a good player but man if it was the truth being paired with kg it would be sick! KG needs a swingman that can be the go-to-guy and relieve him on offense. He has carried this team so much and i think its about time the mgt repay him. I like garnett and want to see him to win a championship but i don't think though that's in minnesota.
User avatar
Nel
 
Posts: 583
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 10:55 pm
Location: Projects

Postby Riot on Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:05 pm

Well, the rumors here in Minnesota is McHale is trying to get Steve Francis or Stephon Marbury. At this point, I wouldn't mind either of them. We need to do something.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby Andrew on Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:08 pm

I'd take Marbury out of those two. What a pair he and KG might have made had he stuck around.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115124
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Dan's Brain on Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:11 pm

How would you get them? Ricky Davis and other things i guess.
User avatar
Dan's Brain
My Manwich!
 
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:08 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Postby Riot on Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:14 pm

Hinrich_12 wrote:How would you get them? Ricky Davis and other things i guess.


Nope, Marko Jaric + Rashad McCants + $4.5 million trade exception, probably.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby Dan's Brain on Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:19 pm

I dont know if anything will happen by the deadline. Might be better to wait until the offseason, give McCants more of a run in the second half of the year, then u can have a more intelligent judgement of his abilities. Also, it might increase his value.
User avatar
Dan's Brain
My Manwich!
 
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:08 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Postby Riot on Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:25 pm

The Timberwolves are desperate right now and they'll do anything. At the same time, I'm not sure if the team would take Marbury back. Owner Glen Taylor has a sour taste in his mouth after the way Marbury left earlier in his career.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby Immali on Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:37 am

I agree with Riot about the importance of KG for the wolves organization....but i don't really think it's possible for them to build a champ team in a couple of years.
You'll never get a KG-like player in return, but you must give a guy like him a real chance of playing for the ring.
KG is the player i like most in the NBA with T-Mac. I'd love to see those two playing together. In my mind i dream of a KG-Yao trade so that houston can play for the title now and the wolves can re-build around, let's say...yao, ricky davis, luther head (?).... :lol: i know i'm dreaming, but i just needed to say this...
All the best to KG!!!!! (Y)
Endure. In endurance grow strong.
Immali
 
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:52 am
Location: Italy

Next

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests