by ixcuincle on Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:02 pm
One could argue that many of the teams the candidates play for would be the same without their mvp candidate. Take , for instance , Detroit. I know this is a minority opinion but I just don't see Detroit changing drastically without Billups. They would continue to remain the best team in the East since other players will just pick up the slack , i.e. Ben Wallace , Rasheed Wallace , Rip Hamilton. I find it hard to believe that all of them would start losing or playing poorly if , in a hypothetical situation , Billups was to leave as a free agent next year. Billups is a great point guard but not MVP-worthy yet in my opinion.
I've explained this before in the Kobe 81 thread and I'll explain it again. At this point in time , if NBA MVP voting were held now , Kobe would be the clear-cut winner , no questions asked. If the Lakers choke and pull a Bobcats 13-game losing streak , and completely blow themselves out of playoff contention , then I stand corrected. Otherwise how can you deny the MVP award to the player who has the 2nd highest point total in NBA history? I know he shouldn't be awarded the MVP on that performance alone but it is the other spectacular performances he has had , combined with that legendary day , which make him a strong candidate and possibly winner of the MVP award. If the MVP award isn't only about points , then Kobe Bryant remains a strong candidate simply because the Lakers would be horribly under .500 without him going out there and scoring 30-40+ every night. As I said above , no other candidate , when removed from their team , would be as bad as Kobe being removed from the Lakers.
