Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.
Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:42 pm
I just felt like giving Antawn Jamison some love as I feel he doesnt get recognized enough even though he has been putting up solid numbers over the years. I have been watching this guy since his Tar Heel days and he is very quick for his size while he can score in bunches with a vast assortment of shots.
Does any body else in here like Antawn's game?
Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:44 pm
too bad he lets he doesn't play a lick of defense
Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:07 pm
He's a great rebounder. I bet most people don't know that he is 10th in the league in rebounds per game.
Tue Jan 17, 2006 11:53 pm
Career avg- 19.1 ppg, 7.5 rpg
Solid numbers imo for a guy who i think isnt appreciated as much as he should.
He also has put up the big 50 a couple times already.
He also had his best season so far in 00-01 when he put up 25 ppg, 9 rpg, and 2 dimes.
Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:55 am
Dada, thats way of appreciating him? Posting a picture? You have to be kidding. How about talking about he played through the constant laughter from fans that Golden State traded him for Vince? How about how he scored back to back 50 point games and outdueled Kobe in 2000/01? How about the fact he never really blasted his subpar team in Golden State and tried to stick around to help the warriors get back on their feet? How about how he was willing to come off the bench for Dallas in 2004 and was willing to sacrifice his game for the good of the team (somthing dirk has yet to do)? How about when he was traded to washington he never complained, he kept his head high and led a young team who have never experienced winning to the second round?
Oh nah, lets forget all that and post a picture. Great way to show your appreciation asa fan

.
Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:49 am
I never wanted to sum up everything in one post. I was hoping that people would come in and give there 2 cents to get the convo rolling and then we can throw in little tidbits here and there. Didnt work out that way though...oh well.
Last edited by
dada on Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:50 am
So you wanted to increase your post count? Congratulations
Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:52 am
Matthew wrote:So you wanted to increase your post count? Congratulations

Wasnt really thinking about that. Is that supposed to be important?
Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:40 am
He doesn't really get that much recognition, but he was an all-star last year. He had an injury earlier this season so he struggled a bit, so I think that is why people aren't paying enough attention to him this season.
Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:26 pm
he probably could make the underrated list but his contract is quite large... i think he's a poor man's tim duncan.... puts up nice numbers in a quiet way and finds ways to help his team win...
Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:37 pm
Lol how do you come to that conclusion? Duncans biggest impact on the game is his help defense and rebounding these days, and Jamisons is with the ball in his hands. Yeah a poor man's duncan for sure!
Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:03 pm
Matthew wrote:Lol how do you come to that conclusion? Duncans biggest impact on the game is his help defense and rebounding these days, and Jamisons is with the ball in his hands. Yeah a poor man's duncan for sure!

lol duncans biggest impact on the game these days is defense and rebounding is because he has plantar facisis..... and i was referring to the fact that both of them put up stats in a quiet fashion when i said a poor mans duncan....
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:10 pm
Duncans biggest impact on the game is his help defense and rebounding these days

I wonder why thse stats guys have him averaging 20-11 then...
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:15 pm
Dweaver, you seriously have to stop living in 2002. Duncans biggest impact is on the defensive side of the ball with rotations and rebounding. Tony Parker, Manu, Finely all can carry the spurs now offensively, but its duncans help defense that anchors the spurs excellent defense. Just look at how good he has made Bowen! All BB has to do is force his man into help (which is duncan 90% of the time) and he's "shut his man down". Without Duncan, they'd be a really soft defensive team.
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:22 pm
I agree, partly. But still, claiming that
Duncans biggest impact on the game is his help defense and rebounding these days
is just dumb, when he is still the team's leading scorer, albeit being awful from the FT line.
Many people CAN carry the Spurs offensively, but Duncan is the one who actually DOES.
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:25 pm
just_decent wrote:Matthew wrote:Lol how do you come to that conclusion? Duncans biggest impact on the game is his help defense and rebounding these days, and Jamisons is with the ball in his hands. Yeah a poor man's duncan for sure!

lol duncans biggest impact on the game these days is defense and rebounding is because he has plantar facisis..... and i was referring to the fact that both of them put up stats in a quiet fashion when i said a poor mans duncan....

You're the same guy that said AK47 is a poor man's KG
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:28 pm
You yourself said in the Vince Carter for MVP thread that Carter doesn't carry the Nets (despite leading them in scoring by over 7 ppg more than Jefferson, compared to Duncan who averages less than 1 ppg more than parker) so which is it? Parker also averages more assists and is shooting a higher percentage. And besides, even if Duncan is running the spurs offense (i say its around 40 % duncan, 40% parker, 20% manu) duncan is more valuable to the spurs in terms of his rebounding and help defense. Its similar to ben wallace, only not as drastic.
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:29 pm
The fact that he carries them offensively doesnt necessarily mean that is his biggest impact on the game. He may carry them but where would they be now without him clogging up the paint and getting all the important boards? He isnt that prolific a scorer for me to say thats his biggest asset. They have so many options that they can survive an off night offensively from Duncan.
edit:why did you have to squeeze in ahead of me?
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:35 pm
so which is it?
Depends on the team, obviously. Fot the Spurs, it's always been Duncan up until now.
And besides, even if Duncan is running the spurs offense (i say its around 40 % duncan, 40% parker, 20% manu) duncan is more valuable to the spurs in terms of his rebounding and help defense.
I agree that he is the defensive mainstay. But he is as valuable if not more on offense. just getting that extra man to help out is a huge boost to the team's offense as a whole, and should not be downplayed.
The fact that he carries them offensively doesnt necessarily mean that is his biggest impact on the game.
See above.
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:42 pm
Dweaver, sometimes I don't believe you're a GS fan.
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:43 pm
jugs wrote:Dweaver, sometimes I don't believe you're a GS fan.
Yes, I have trouble coming to that realisation, too. For the past 11 years.
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:46 pm
Stop defending Duncan, you should be shitting on him. He's the immortal enemy
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:47 pm
jugs wrote:Stop defending Duncan, you should be shitting on him. He's the immortal enemy

Of whom? Not GS, for sure.
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:51 pm
Its funny to imagine you stooping down to take a shit on Duncan.
Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:55 pm
I agree that he is the defensive mainstay. But he is as valuable if not more on offense. just getting that extra man to help out is a huge boost to the team's offense as a whole, and should not be downplayed.
That has zero influence on Parkers game whatsoever, as Parker always has one defender on him, and when he gets into the lane, he draws help in a similar fashion to how timmy draws help defenders
Depends on the team, obviously. Fot the Spurs, it's always been Duncan up until now.
Obviously its a double standard.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.