Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.
Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:43 am
garnett averaging 30ppg?
how did you come to that conclusion?
Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:58 am
Kobe is going to.
Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:01 am
AI and/or Kobe.
Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:13 am
KOBE4MVP8: save yourself and the forum a lot of time. we already know
Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:30 pm
Andrew wrote:Last season would suggest that Kobe dominating the ball isn't a successful strategy. Odom certainly won't be effective with Kobe scoring 30+ per game, it's not always going to work out as it did against Denver.
Well... It's working so far. Kobe is scoring with fair accuracy, and I want the same doping Smush Parker is having for himself.
Thu Nov 10, 2005 3:21 am
putodelagoa wrote:Andrew wrote:Last season would suggest that Kobe dominating the ball isn't a successful strategy. Odom certainly won't be effective with Kobe scoring 30+ per game, it's not always going to work out as it did against Denver.
Well... It's working so far. Kobe is scoring with fair accuracy, and I want the same doping Smush Parker is having for himself.

Smush has been a pleasant surprise. I dont know why but I was expecting good numbers but not so early in the season. I thought as the season progressed he would get comfortable and simply bring the confidence from the playgrounds to the hardcourts. Great to see it materializing and so far he seems to be perfect for the job.
Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:51 am
putodelagoa wrote:Andrew wrote:Last season would suggest that Kobe dominating the ball isn't a successful strategy. Odom certainly won't be effective with Kobe scoring 30+ per game, it's not always going to work out as it did against Denver.
Well... It's working so far. Kobe is scoring with fair accuracy, and I want the same doping Smush Parker is having for himself.

Indeed it is. But maintaining a 35 ppg average through 82 games is easier said than done, and it's early days. Ultimately, you can't win with just one player putting up stats. At the very least you need the rest of the team to be consistent and productive to go a long way in the NBA.
Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:18 am
Of course, you're right. But 3 players of the starting five are anything but sure fire starters, and pretty far away from being proven or consistent... Simply put, if Bryant doesn't go 1987 Jordan on everybody, the Lakers are in for a long season. Of course, dominating the scoring doesn't have to mean you shoot every possession and that all shots are acceptable. I'm sure Bryant learned it last year.
Jordan did score over 35 ppg in two seasons, but shot over 48% from the floor. That's a Center average, nowadays.
Parker went cinderella on us for a week, but midnight came much earlier than expected. Let's see how he will do today.
Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:33 am
That's true, but the Bulls enjoyed more success when Pippen took a larger role in the offense and Jordan was "only" scoring around 31, 32 per game. And you're right about three of the Lakers' starters being inconsistent and unproven, but Odom doesn't fit that bill. Kobe might have to shoulder more of the load than what may be "ideal" for greater success, but eventually he'll have to pull back a bit for the Lakers to go to the next step...at least he will if history is anything to go by.
Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:11 am
That's what I mean. Kobe will be compelled to hold off a little bit, WHEN ( this needs enphasis, since it's not the case right now... ) he will have a decent supporting cast. Jordan had Pip, but he also had Horace Grant. That's 2 Legit players, and then the steady Vets in Oakley ( Cartwright later),Paxson, Hodges. He had a slightly better cast to defer to, wouldn't you say?
Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:18 am
No doubt. It's more about Odom taking a larger role, though, or finding a way for him to be as effective with the ball in Kobe's hands.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.