
Well do your job...judge me!!
And after that i would like to hear your thoughts

Emiliano wrote:Jona wrote:Emm, dale weon, deja que termine con tu vieja primero y de ahí le doy a tu hermana.
Muy bien dicho....la verdad ya estos polss me estan cansando.
Riot wrote:dur dur dur earth to retards! GET THE HELL OUT OF HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jona wrote:Riot wrote:dur dur dur earth to retards! GET THE HELL OUT OF HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WTF was that all about?
cypruslakersfan wrote:Andrew I can accept that the Celtics have two things that no other team can match anytime soon: (1) The greatest dynasty ever made, (2) Most hall of famers than any other team at the number of 29...If anyone can make a deep search into the Hall he can see that 13 of the 29 HOF was a member of the Boston Celtics of the late 50s or 60s and they are 2 or 3 of them who won just a championship with them and they are CELTICS HOF!! And all the others are from 70s and 80s. What about the years between 1993-2005? These players must have been very good and must had a big impact in the game and i have no doubt about that...But when you talk about a 30 year championship history (1957-1986) even if it is as glorius as it gets you can't compare it with the 14 lakers players whose playing years are presenting the whole 57 year Minneapolis/Los Angeles Lakers history if you include some of the future hall of famers like Kobe and Shaq. Between this two teams there is not better and worse because their history is much more different than each other's.
That's what i think and thats why I didn't include any team names because i want to know what are the criteria of the other fans...
Hey can you stop going off topic with your offtopic comments gooseberry?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests