Kevin Garnett

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Kevin Garnett

Postby beau_boy04 on Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:57 am

One of the best all-around players! yes indeed! any possibility that he might be traded? I don't like seeing him in Minnesota! the team is not doing anything to get better. How many years he has in his contract? I can't wait to see him leave Minnesota.
User avatar
beau_boy04
 
Posts: 1310
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 9:56 am

Postby RxC6 on Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:06 am

yeah maybe just like another LA and Miami trade ... 1 Shaq for a bunch of players :lol:

but maybe McCants & Garnett could be another Dynamic Duo in Minnesota :D
RxC6
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 9:26 pm

Postby Riot on Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:32 am

Garnett will never leave Minnesota. He has a two-way trade clause in his contract, the owner is in love with him and his wife loves it here in Minnesota. Not to mention he's been here for 10 years and he hasn't shaken or demanded a trade yet.

There will always been trade rumors involving KG, because he is simply one of the top two players in the world, but the Wolves trading KG would be like the Pacers trading Reggie Miller. It just won't happen.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby Blue Nugget on Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:32 am

Yeha,KG is a Wolf.
Image
User avatar
Blue Nugget
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 4:09 am

Postby Kemp on Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:03 am

KG is like Duncan, will not be traded to another team because they both are the franchise player for their team.
Image
User avatar
Kemp
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:51 pm

Postby Its_asdf on Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:51 am

KG is like Duncan, will not be traded to another team because they both are the franchise player for their team


You could call Vince Carter, Tracy McGrady, Grant Hill, Shaquille O'Neal, Wilt Chamberlain, Steve Francis and plenty of others were so called "franchise players" for their teams, and all of them have moved at least once. I don't think any "franchise player" is unmovable, but Kevin Garnett isn't exactly going to be leaving anytime soon. Maybe when he gets fed up and decides that he is too old and wants a ring.
User avatar
Its_asdf
I'm kind of a big deal.
 
Posts: 5462
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Under a Rock in Canada

Postby Kemp on Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:36 pm

Dr. Funky wrote:
You could call Vince Carter, Tracy McGrady, Grant Hill, Shaquille O'Neal, Wilt Chamberlain, Steve Francis and plenty of others were so called "franchise players" for their teams, and all of them have moved at least once. I don't think any "franchise player" is unmovable, but Kevin Garnett isn't exactly going to be leaving anytime soon. Maybe when he gets fed up and decides that he is too old and wants a ring.

Certainly, like Malone and Payton, if they both wants a ring then of course they will get traded or sign as a free agent. But for Duncan, I don't think he will be traded to another team because he already got rings. But for those franchise players who don't have a ring yet, they will be asked for a trade.
Image
User avatar
Kemp
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:51 pm

Postby Mentally Hilarious on Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:57 pm

Okafor50 wrote:
Dr. Funky wrote:
You could call Vince Carter, Tracy McGrady, Grant Hill, Shaquille O'Neal, Wilt Chamberlain, Steve Francis and plenty of others were so called "franchise players" for their teams, and all of them have moved at least once. I don't think any "franchise player" is unmovable, but Kevin Garnett isn't exactly going to be leaving anytime soon. Maybe when he gets fed up and decides that he is too old and wants a ring.

Certainly, like Malone and Payton, if they both wants a ring then of course they will get traded or sign as a free agent. But for Duncan, I don't think he will be traded to another team because he already got rings. But for those franchise players who don't have a ring yet, they will be asked for a trade.


A player like KG then? Thus making your first point kinda contradictional.
Image
User avatar
Mentally Hilarious
 
Posts: 1045
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:07 am

Postby Riot on Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:44 pm

Honestly, I doubt KG ever leaves Minnesota. He isn't like Payton or Malone. He doesn't want a ring just to have a ring, he wants to earn his ring. He doesn't want to ride the coatails of players in their prime to get a title. He has said this a million times "I started something in Minnesota and I'm going to finish it here". Maybe those words don't hold much value to you guys but to the state of Minnesota it's a big relief. KG trusts us and we trust him, it's been that way for 10 years. Neither has let the other down.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby Amphatoast on Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:54 pm

Malone was like that with Utah i think... always was there and was their till the near end
Amphatoast
 
Posts: 3004
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:45 am
Location: new york

Postby Riot on Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:52 pm

That's what a lot of people say, but if you aren't Minnesotan you really don't understand the connection between KG and the state. Not only that, but without KG the Wolves wouldn't make much money and the owner (Taylor) would lose a ton of sponsers.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Trade. HA!

Postby shadowgrin on Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:30 pm

Amphatoast wrote:Malone was like that with Utah i think... always was there and was their till the near end

It was a mutual agreement with the Jazz organization and Malone to part ways. Malone wanted a ring (and a sum of money to stay), but the Jazz were starting to rebuild with younger players. The Jazz couldn't be title contenders at that point and giving him a huge amount would hinder their rebuilding process. If Malone was to play for a smaller amount it might as well be in team that was a title contender such as the Lakers (then).
shadowgrin
Doesn't negotiate with terrorists. NLSC's Jefferson Davis. The Questioneer
 
Posts: 23229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:21 am
Location: In your mind

Postby Andrew on Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:50 pm

Not to mention Malone had his run-ins with Larry Miller in Utah pretty much throughout his career.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115118
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby maes on Tue Jul 26, 2005 3:26 am

Many superstar guys get traded at the very end of their career for various reasons, and it's usually a mutual friendly agreement /w the team, but during the height of their career they are untouchable.

For now, KG will stay. When he's 38, he may want to go somewhere or do something different.

You also have to take the owner into account. If Cuban owned the wolves, then i'd say hell yeah, KG has a very good chance of being traded, so does anyone on the team.
maes
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:58 am
Location: Chicago

Postby Jackal on Tue Jul 26, 2005 3:40 am

Not Dirk...
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby Indy on Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:26 am

Riot wrote:There will always been trade rumors involving KG, because he is simply one of the top two players in the world, but the Wolves trading KG would be like the Pacers trading Reggie Miller. It just won't happen.


I agree. A lot of Pacer fans think because we signed Saras, we are planning on trading Tinsley and JO for Garnett...

That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
Image
User avatar
Indy
 
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:32 pm
Location: Dublin

Postby Kemp on Tue Jul 26, 2005 10:01 am

Tinsley and JO for Garnett. It won't happen.
Image
User avatar
Kemp
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:51 pm

Postby Riot on Tue Jul 26, 2005 10:05 am

anyone for KG won't happen. Period.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby matmat8 on Tue Jul 26, 2005 11:27 am

IndyPacers67 wrote: That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.


Oh yeah...at least. Tinsley+JO for Garnett would be a steal for the Pacers and a plausible trade.

I wouldn't be too sure Garnett is staying. It's easy to say your comitted to your team and the fans when you have a good team and/or enough years left to win but when time comes...

Maybe not this year but Garnett is the best nba player and he should at least be contending every year going to the conference finals or finals...last year the wolves didn't even make the playoffs.
matmat8
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:11 pm
Location: france

Postby Riot on Tue Jul 26, 2005 11:31 am

Wolves will be back to contending this year, quote me. :D
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am


Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests