Andrew wrote: seriously, I want the suggestions and I'm happy to make corrections. Give me feedback and I'll use it.
bigh0rt wrote:I'm all in. Last year I gave every single player brand new ratings based on mathematical equations I came up with correlating to their numbers and percentages. I'm not about to do that again this year, but I can certainly help.
Fee Nick's Uns [15-10] says:
i'd suck allen iverson's cock any day -
Fee Nick's Uns [15-10] says:
just so i could say i've met allen iverson
dvafjr wrote:Andrew, you are the father of this. I don't think you should reply so sensitively to all the post that might challenge your work. Should I have titled it a little different? For that I'm sorry. But I'm tryin to see if my ideas are the same as others. If maybe this thing can catch on. So we can make that perfect true-to-life rating scale for everyone to enjoy.
Andrew wrote:dvafjr wrote:Andrew, you are the father of this. I don't think you should reply so sensitively to all the post that might challenge your work. Should I have titled it a little different? For that I'm sorry. But I'm tryin to see if my ideas are the same as others. If maybe this thing can catch on. So we can make that perfect true-to-life rating scale for everyone to enjoy.
If you take a look around the forum, you'll find that I'm very accepting of the feedback, which was the point of my post. I ask for it, and I put it to use. I hardly think I'm being overly sensitive when someone comes in, simply posts that my ratings are "bullshit" without so much as offering any suggestions, either now or in the past, which is pretty offensive given how much time and effort I put into the rosters.
So please don't tell me not to rely so "sensitively" to posts "challenging my work". I'm already pushing myself to continue to put in the same effort with the site with my new job, and I don't mind telling you I'm feeling the strain and really starting to wonder whether it's worth it and whether I can really continue to do it.
EDIT: Just to add to that...I can see where you're coming from, but the fact of the matter is that's what I'm endeavouring to do with the updates. Any suggestions...post them or email them to me. I can put constructive criticism and suggestions to use, but simply saying there are problems with the updates or the ratings are incorrect isn't all that helpful.
marcusmirx wrote:i think a bad part about your roster patches is that created players are sometimes rated very high. I liked the small changes you did in the first version to some players however i don't agree in most ratings of the created players. I think that is something you can easily improve.. Also, remember about players like Iguodala, i know you didn't do them however some are really off. Besides that i like your patches.
Andrew wrote:marcusmirx wrote:i think a bad part about your roster patches is that created players are sometimes rated very high. I liked the small changes you did in the first version to some players however i don't agree in most ratings of the created players. I think that is something you can easily improve.. Also, remember about players like Iguodala, i know you didn't do them however some are really off. Besides that i like your patches.
That's kind of what I'm talking about. All you're saying is that the ratings are "bad" and need to improve, whereas specific suggestions would be much more helpful. But I will go back and look at the created players and see what I can do. Just remember that I don't boost or decrease ratings simply so the overall looks better.
dvafjr: Again, if you have any suggestions, post them or email me.
don't forget about Iguodala.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests