I suggest that you pick one play for the 1st quarter then the other one for the 2nd quarter. Whatever works best for
them then use that for the remaining 2 quarters. True, some plays doesn't make alot of 3 point shots but I some plays do. I wish I can tell you which plays were they, I think Double High fire more 3 point shots then others if my memory serves me correctly. If you are really worried about their 3 point attempts then set the 3rd quarter to Dynamics then on the 4th quarter use whichever works best.
Ever since I got the game I have been playing on Franchise Mode with Zaxis' tweak (with real life salaries). In my experience with the sets that I have recomended, I find that I am being burned by the right players namely their star players. They also pass the ball more making the pace somewhat slower yet at the same time they still go for the fastbreak whenever they get the chance.
For those who doesn't know what this is all about, below is what I posted from this thread
http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~nbalive/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3801 .
Urotsukidoji wrote:In response to DK's suggestion this is what I did. I set two CPUs to battle it out and change there offensive sets. I let them play out for 1 qtr (12 mins) with no fatigue and no auto substitute to see what the starters might do. At the end of the qtr, i recorded which positions took the most shot at what offensive set. The ff are the offensive set with the 3 most dominant postions ( the number right next to the position is the # of shot they took.
OFFENSIVE SETS 1ST 2ND 3RD
1-4 High SG (6) SF (5) PG (5)
Ball Screen PF (6) SG (5) PG (5)
Box SG (11) SF (7) PF (4)
Double High SG (8) PG (7) PF (6)
Flex C (9) SF (4) PF (3)
Hawks SG (8) PF (4) PG (4)
High Post PG (8) SG (7) PF (5)
Inside Triangle SF* PG* C*
Motion C (7) SF (3) SG(3)/PG(3)
Quick Hitters SG (11) SF (6) PF (4)
Sideline Triangle C (11) PG (5) SF (4)
Turnout SG (9) PF (6) SF (5)
Zipper SG (8) SF (8) C (5)
* Not My Data (DK)
Now by considering the teams and there star player I assigned 2 set plays for each team.
TEAMS OFFENSIVE PLAYS
Atlanta Hawks Ball Screen, Hawks
Boston Celtics 1-4 High, Hawks
Chicago Bulls Motion, Zipper
Cleveland Cavaliers Motion, Zipper
Dallas Mavericks 1-4 High, Motion
Denver Nuggets Flex, Sideline Triangle
Detroit Pistons Motion, Quick Hitters
Golden State Warriors Zipper, Box
Houston Rockets High Post, Double High
Indiana Pacers Ball Screen, Motion
LA Clippers Turnout, Motion
LA Lakers ?
Memphis Grizzlies Turnout, Quick Hitters
Miami Heat Quick Hitters, Double High
Milwaukee Bucks 1-4 High, Double High
Minnesota Timberwolves Zipper, Box
New Jersey Nets Motion, High Post
New Orleans Hornets Motion, 1-4 High
New York Knicks Box, Quick Hitters
Orlando Magic Quick Hitters, 1-4 High
Philadelphia 76ers Quick Hitters, Ball Screen
Phoenix Suns High Post, 1-4 High
Portland Trailblazers Ball Screen, Turnout
Sacramento Kings Ball Screen, Turnout
San Antonio Spurs Ball Screen, Turnout
Seattle Supersonics High Post, 1-4 High
Toronto Raptors Quick Hitters, Box
Utah Jazz Ball Screen, High Post
Washington Wizards 1-4 High, Box
I played against San Antonio and Portland and both teams favored there star players: Duncan, Smith, Parker and Wallace, Wells and Stoudamire. They also shot roughly in the the 40% and tend to set plays rather than just run gun therefore slowing the pace of the game. (With 8 min qtr and default roster ... not DK's tweaked one).
Now if you consider my procedure there lots of room for error BUT this is only a test and this experiment should be done more than once. Let me know what you guys think and I'll post this again in a more appropriate thread created by DK somewhere.
Let me know what you guys think or discovered and thanks DK for discovering this method.[/b]
[/i]