air gordon wrote:how was it so obvious??
Andrew wrote:air gordon wrote:how was it so obvious??
I didn't say it was obvious, because until now we didn't have anything to really draw a conclusion from. I'm not saying it was obvious all along that LeBron didn't want Izzo because it wasn't. However, after reading that report I'd suggest his position is obvious now, since LeBron having no interest in speaking to Izzo and helping the Cavs bring him to town is hardly a ringing endorsement. Assuming that report is accurate, then I think it's a case of silence speaking volumes.
Andrew wrote:Fair enough. Reading that report Confucious posted, the immediate conclusion I drew was that LeBron was not thrilled about the possibility of the Cavs hiring Izzo. It's what jumped out at me straight away, which is why I deemed it obvious.
As far as it working to other teams' advantage...sure, but I'm still trying not to get too excited about the possibility of the Bulls landing LeBron so I'm not as ready and willing to read a report like that and say "score one for Chicago", when it could just as easily be "score one for New York" or whoever. Of course I'm hoping for the best, but that hopefulness is battling some pessimism and doubt right now.
Do you think Thibodeau will be an appealing enough draw in the head coach's seat for LeBron? He's gotten such rave reviews that I'd say he could well be, more so than VDN likely would have been if nothing else.
Confusious wrote:Lebron simply doesn't want to make commitments with Cleveland, which speaks volumes. He doesn't want to get involved in the coaching search, when he's believed to have been involved in a lot of the Cavs moves the last couple years. Why the silence and non-activity lately? I genuinely think it's because he's moving on from Cleveland.
air gordon wrote:i wonder what the strategy is of PaxMan? i'm sure LBJ is the #1 priority followed by Bosh. after that i'm not sure. My inkling is they don't want to offer a max to Amare considering his injury history. that leaves: Boozer, Joe Johnson, David Lee
air gordon wrote:realistically i think it's either Boozer or Lee
ZanShadow wrote:Personally, I think it's gonna be Joe Johnson if fails to get Lebron. I read one article that the Bulls have to mess up bad to miss on Joe Johnson.
I am thinking Chicago's chance of landing Lebron is higher than Miami, NYK, or Nets due to you guys being considerably a big market team and having a decent players. He also praises how great MJ was, so I am guessing he's a fan of the 90's Bulls. MJ.
Only thing that'd stop him going to Chicago I think would be his ego since Chicago's greatest player will always remain
July 8th i think players can sign. i wonder if the Big 3 FA's even know what they're going to doAnyways, let July 1st come and whoever lands Lebron, he's going to change the faith of that franchise. That's for sure. I just can't wait how it will turn out.
air gordon wrote:yeh sure but i don't think the bulls want him.. if ATL does a sign and trade and we sign Bosh.. then sure
air gordon wrote:on a side note- i can't believe the Bucks took on Maggette's salary... who would have known!?!?! shit if GSW can move that contract, why wouldn't the bulls be able to move deng's???
air gordon wrote:on a side note- i can't believe the Bucks took on Maggette's salary... who would have known!?!?! shit if GSW can move that contract, why wouldn't the bulls be able to move deng's???
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests