Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:47 am
stackmillz93 wrote:So you think Lebron didn't have complete control over Mike Brown? And when he mentioned his "team" he was talking about his inner circle, not the Cavs.
koberulz wrote:imefimef wrote:He did that shit on purpose like Kobe did in 06(Lakers were up 3-0 against Suns but it went to game 7 and Kobe took only 3 shots in the last 2 quarters, Then Kobe got Gasol).
Ignoring, of course, that he put up 50 in game six trying to get the Lakers over the line, and was foiled by nothing more than a Tim Thomas three.
Modifly wrote:I guess the majority of us will remain skeptical.
Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:58 am
Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:55 am
Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:02 am
Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:13 am
Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:36 am
benji wrote:This really deserved a thread on its own instead of going in the other LeBron-stakes thread?
So in other words, "LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT ME!" right?
Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:53 am
imefimef wrote:Did i know there was another LeBron James thread? umm no, i had class in 3 and a half mins so i quickly wrote something up and posted it up, sorry i didn't have time to browse the forum in it's entirety for another similar topic, and technically i would get wayyyy more people to see this if i posted it under a thread that already has a bunch of views so yeah.
imefimef wrote:Kobe is not the leader of the Lakers people, it's Derek Fisher.
Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:15 am
imefimef wrote:DAMN THAT WAS LONG. I THINK IT DESERVES IT'S OWN THREAD.
Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:40 am
Andrew wrote:air gordon wrote:so Lebron James, Chris Bosh, etc don't want to come to chicago because....??
I never said any such thing. All I said was that the reputation of the Bulls' front office and the way they've conducted themselves concerns me a little when it comes to them making a pitch to free agents. It's just a nagging thought, I'm not stating definitively that they cannot attract a top free agent because of it.
Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:18 am
imefimef wrote:benji wrote:This really deserved a thread on its own instead of going in the other LeBron-stakes thread?
So in other words, "LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT ME!" right?
Did i know there was another LeBron James thread? umm no, i had class in 3 and a half mins so i quickly wrote something up and posted it up, sorry i didn't have time to browse the forum in it's entirety for another similar topic, and technically i would get wayyyy more people to see this if i posted it under a thread that already has a bunch of views so yeah.
But for the tard who said LeBron is one dimensional.
How can some one who is very good at doing everything on the basketball court be one dimensional?
Micheal Jordan is a combination of LeBron's doing everything and Kobe's scoring abiity, so until LeBron starts scoring at the same skill level as Kobe, no one would be as good as Micheal.
LeBron is better than Kobe IMO because like i said he isn't the best scorer but i think its safe to say hes the second best.
I mean freethrow shooting, jumpshots, in short offense, Kobe is better
but LeBron is actually more efficient in...3pt%than Kobe
anyways so id rather have someone actually score more on less attempts.
defence(on-ball is arguable
off-ball-thats blocks and steals- is undeniable)
even leadership, Kobe is not the leader of the Lakers people, it's Derek Fisher.
i'd take someone who is a jack of all trades than someone is is the master of just one.
Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:26 am
air gordon wrote:i enjoy giving the F.O a hard time myself. but let's step back for a second... What is their "rep"? aside from the Del Negro situation, paxWoman has done a good job setting up the team to be an attractive option for a max player, fingers crossed LBJ, and another decent player.
Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:28 am
So...someone who can shoot the three, get to the rim, post up, and play in the mid-range over someone who can only penetrate? Good to see we agree, then.
Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:32 am
koberulz wrote:With numbers that don't exist. Come back when LeBron's scored 52 points on 26 shots.
Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:44 am
Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:57 am
Player | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | TOV% | ORtg | PER | WS/48 |
LeBron James | 24.8 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 1.56 | 0.78 | .562 | 11.7 | 114 | 26.9 | .224 |
Kobe Bryant | 22.8 | 5.3 | 4.4 | 1.53 | 0.68 | .548 | 12.1 | 110 | 22.2 | .187 |
Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:00 pm
Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:25 pm
Player | % of FGA Jumpers | eFG% on Jumpers | % of Jumpers Assisted | % of FGA Threes | 3P% | FG% on 2PT Jumpers |
LeBron James (2009-10) | 64% | .436 | 24% | 25.3 | .333 | .393 |
Kobe Bryant (2002-03) | 78% | .440 | 39% | 16.8 | .383 | .406 |
Player | 2pt Jumper | 3pt Jumper | Non-Dunk Inside | Dunk | Free Throw | Pass | Turnover | Pass-to-Shot Ratio |
LeBron James | 21.3 | 13.9 | 14.8 | 4.4 | 12.2 | 28.8 | 4.0 | 2.32 |
Kobe Bryant | 39.1 | 10.8 | 9.6 | 3.8 | 10.4 | 20.7 | 4.9 | 3.57 |
Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:30 pm
Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:15 pm
Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:17 pm
ZanShadow wrote:A lot of dog diarrhea shit spits in this thread, but at least we get to see undeniable strong points from benji's stats.
Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:37 pm
Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:40 pm
ZanShadow wrote:Better question is, if you are ever going to lay it off and say "I stand corrected." for once in your life.
You were proven wrong in your every single stupid claims
and yet you keep on dragging it on, spitting same dog shit diarrhea over and over again. Well... if you ever stop doing it, somebody finally might take your idea more seriously.
Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:24 pm
benji wrote:a thread that was originally about BASKETBALL.
Wed Jun 02, 2010 3:03 pm
benji wrote:How about this? LeBron vs. Kobe on jumpers at the same age?
Player % of FGA Jumpers eFG% on Jumpers % of Jumpers Assisted % of FGA Threes 3P% FG% on 2PT Jumpers LeBron James (2009-10) 64% .436 24% 25.3 .333 .393 Kobe Bryant (2002-03) 78% .440 39% 16.8 .383 .406
So LeBron spent two-thirds of his possessions taking a shot, of which a majority were higher value shots, despite the lower turnover rate? Yep, While Kobe used three-fourths of his possessions on taking a shot, more than half of which were two-point jumpers the least valuable shot in the game? Yep.