ESPN: Who's Improved In the Off-Season?

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

ESPN: Who's Improved In the Off-Season?

Postby -BHZMAFIA- on Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:20 am

2007-08 outlook: Who's improved thanks to offseason moves?
By John Hollinger
ESPN Insider
(Archive)
Updated: July 18, 2007
Comment
Email
• Coming Thursday: Hollinger's offseason losers

Improvement. That's the name of the game in the offseason, and it comes in all shapes and sizes. Teams can get better in a variety of ways -- through holdover players raising their games, through trimming dead wood from the previous season's roster, or by adding talent through the draft, trades or free agency. And sometimes, it doesn't even take any of that -- it just takes a different general on the sidelines pulling it all together.

But one thing remains constant: Standing pat is a formula for failure. In a business in which careers tend to be brief, it's imperative to constantly bring in new blood. Just ask the Miami Heat, who were so giddy about winning a championship in 2006 that they brought back the same roster last season -- and watched their aging crew fail to win a single playoff game in one of the weaker title defenses in league history.

Fortunately, half of the league's teams have made additions to their rosters that should prove quite helpful in the coming season, and that's the group I'll be discussing today. While not all of these moves were in the teams' best long-term interests ($24 million for Jason Kapono!?!?!?), what I want to do today is focus on how those maneuvers affect each team for this coming season in particular.

And if we're only looking at the upcoming season, even a fairly reckless move can have positive short-term effects.

With that as the background, here's a midsummer update showing the teams that have made themselves more formidable than they were a year ago and why:

(Major additions and subtractions are given in parentheses)




1. Houston Rockets
(added Mike James, Luis Scola, Jackie Butler and Aaron Brooks; lost Juwan Howard and Vassilis Spanoulis; replaced Jeff Van Gundy with Rick Adelman)

While you're focusing on the San Antonio-Dallas-Phoenix triumvirate in the West, don't sleep on Houston. The Rockets have quietly put together a roster that could very well be the last team standing in that conference in 2008.

Start with the decision to replace Van Gundy with Adelman -- a change in direction that will likely make the team more up-tempo and offensive-minded. They'll miss Van Gundy's defensive genius, but given the offensive stagnation this club showed in 2006-07, it's not a bad trade.

Moreover, hiring Adelman was especially important in this case because it basically adds another player to the roster. Bonzi Wells bristled under Van Gundy after showing up out of shape, and hardly played last season. But he seems excited by being reunited with Adelman, who coached him to a strong campaign in Sacramento two years ago.

From there, add in two vastly underrated trades. The first one pilfered James from Minnesota for Howard, giving the Rockets a do-over on the disastrous James-for-Rafer Alston trade two years ago. The second nabbed Scola and Butler from San Antonio in return for Spanoulis.

Scola, a skilled Argentinian who has been one of the best players in Europe for the past half-decade, will make an immediate impact as a starting power forward. Butler, as a young center with strong scoring skills in the post, should energize a second unit that was bereft of offense last season.

In the big picture, the Rockets aggressively addressed their three main problems: stagant offense, point guard and power forward. Between the coaching change, the additions of James and first-round pick Aaron Brooks at the point, the pickups of Scola and Butler up front, and the de facto addition of Wells, this team suddenly looks loaded. At this point in the offseason, nobody has upgraded more than this club.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




2. Charlotte Bobcats
(added Jason Richardson and Jared Dudley; lost Brevin Knight; replaced Bernie Bickerstaff with Sam Vincent)

While cynics will claim that frugal Bobcats owner Robert Johnson only signed off on the Richardson deal because he had to get over the minimum salary floor, there's no question that the deal addressed a huge weakness that has plagued the Cats throughout their existence.

Richardson is a reliable scorer and rebounder -- one that will help push rookie bust Adam Morrison out of the rotation if he struggles again -- and gives the Bobcats a much-needed go-to guy late in games. It also allows sharpshooter Matt Carroll to shift to a more suitable sixth man role, where his defensive shortcomings won't be so glaring. As a late first-rounder, Dudley could be surprisingly effective too -- don't be shocked if he's earning important minutes by season's end. Add it up and a playoff run doesn't seem far-fetched at all.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




3. Phoenix Suns
(added Grant Hill, Alando Tucker; lost James Jones)

The Suns sold one of their first-round draft picks (uh-gain) but they also used one to grab Tucker, a tweener who should be able to fill in a lot of the minutes played by Jones. But their big grab was Hill, who is as brittle as they come but still a star when he's healthy enough to go.

He should thrive in Phoenix's running game and take over Boris Diaw's role as the de facto point man when Steve Nash is out of the game. Plus, his willingness to sign on the cheap means the Suns might not be done maneuvering just yet. After four decades they're still looking for a title in the Valley of the Sun; Hill might be the guy to get them over the top.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




4. New York Knicks
(added Zach Randolph, Wilson Chandler, Dan Dickau and Fred Jones; lost Steve Francis and Channing Frye)

I'd rank this higher if I had any faith in the ability of Curry and Randolph to defend with even a smidgen of enthusiasm or competence, but I don't. The two will combine to give the Knicks the league's most defensively disinterested frontcourt, and that should put them in the bottom five or so in defensive efficiency.

But offensively, the Knicks might be good enough to play .500 ball anyway. Randolph is a beast in the post, and he can play the high post and float in his feathery left-handed jumper if he needs to clear the lane for Curry. Adding Chandler, Dickau and Jones also helps in the depth department, especially if it gives Isiah Thomas the stones to finally cut Jerome James.

However, the Randolph deal didn't help the Knicks nearly as much as it did the rest of the league, who now can rejoice in several more years of expected luxury tax payments from Zeke's spendthrift regime.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




5. Atlanta Hawks
(added Al Horford, Acie Law)

Throw in two more lottery picks to a cast that already includes rising stars Joe Johnson and Josh Smith, and suddenly the Hawks look a lot more like a real basketball team. Horford was one of the top talents in an extremely strong draft, and at his size he'll probably be able to play some center -- a spot where the Hawks have been badly undermanned in the past.

I'm less bullish on Law's prospects, but he can't be any worse than the gang that manned the point for Atlanta last season. As with Charlotte, it's possible this team's lottery days are coming to an end. Too bad nobody will be in the stands to see it.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




6. Boston Celtics
(added Ray Allen; lost Wally Szczerbiak and Delonte West)

Long-term, I have grave doubts about whether this was the right move for Boston; as I've mentioned before, unless they're about to use Gerald Green and Theo Ratliff's expiring contract as bait to bring in another star, I hardly see the point of acquiring Allen.

But in the short-term, Allen will be a big upgrade on the Wally/West combo that manned a lot of the shooting guard minutes for Boston last season, and that should be enough to pull the C's out of the cellar in the Atlantic.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




7. Memphis Grizzlies
(added Mike Conley, Darko Milicic; lost Chucky Atkins; replaced Tony Barone with Marc Iavaroni)

The Grizzlies added two coveted young talents in Conley and Milicic, with the latter being hugely important because of the lack of a dependable frontcourt sidekick for Pau Gasol. Conley also figures to make an impact, but given his youth, it may come more in future seasons than the present.

Besides, he's filling some big shoes: Unbeknownst to many, Atkins played out of his mind a year ago. Conley will be hard-pressed just to match those numbers this season, let alone exceed them. But with these two additions, Grizz fans at least can see some light at the end of the tunnel.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




8. Washington Wizards
(added Nick Young, Oleksiy Pecherov; likely to add Juan Carlos Navarro)

Can it be? Do the Wizards finally have a bench? Adding three young players to the mix (their last two first-round picks plus whomever they trade Navarro for) certainly makes last season's fatally feeble second unit seem much more imposing for this go-round.

As those who read my draft preview know, I'm hugely skeptical of Young. But if all he has to do is improve upon Roger Mason Jr., I'm guessing he can handle that. Similarly, Pecherov is something of a mystery meat, but he can't be any worse than Jarvis Hayes was last year. And Navarro will be a solid No. 3 guard wherever he ends up, though right now the Wizards seem intent on a trade.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




9. New Orleans Hornets
(added Morris Peterson, Julian Wright)

The Hornets filled their hole at the wings with free agent Peterson and first-rounder Wright, who should be a big upgrade on the Rasual Butler/Desmond Mason combo that filled the slot a year ago.

Peterson gives the team a legit perimeter threat, something it lacked a year ago once Peja Stojakovic went on the shelf, while Wright's all-around game should provide a nice complement off the bench. Between those two and Peja's return, the Hornets impotent offense of a year ago should be a thing of the past.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




10. Sacramento Kings
(added Spencer Hawes and Mikki Moore; replaced coach Eric Musselman with Reggie Theus)

I have no idea if Theus can coach or not, and I think Musselman could do a pretty good job in the right situation. But nobody doubts that the wheels were coming off by the end of last year and that a change would be for the better, so in this case the Mussleman-for-Theus swap should be for the better.

Moreover, the Kings addressed their horrid frontcourt by adding two centers in Hawes and Moore. Neither is going to be great, but right now the Kings will settle for "adequate," especially given the price they paid. These moves may not keep them out of the lottery, but it will at least help stop the bleeding.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




11. Los Angeles Lakers
(added Javaris Crittenton, Derek Fisher)

I'm not sure if this is enough to make Kobe rescind his trade demand, but it helps. The Lakers point guards were disastrous last season, so adding the veteran Fisher to take over for Smush Parker should pay immediate dividends (although the Lakers overpaid and will hate themselves for this two years from now, that's in the future -- remember, we're just looking at the impacts for 2007-08 today).

Crittenton was supposed to be a long-range pick, but he played well enough in summer league that folks may reconsider that position -- especially since at 6-foot-5, he has the size that Phil Jackson craves in the backcourt.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




12. Chicago Bulls
(added Joakim Noah and Joe Smith; lost P.J. Brown)

Maybe power forward isn't the weak spot on the roster anymore. Already possessing a promising stud at the position in Tyrus Thomas, the Bulls added the energy of Noah and the veteran smarts of Smith to their roster, shoring up a spot manned by a fading Brown last season. No, none of these guys can score in the post, which is where the Bulls really could use help, but they'll add another jolt of energy to the frontcourt. Plus, they give Chicago yet more assets to throw into a trade for the likes of Kevin Garnett or Pau Gasol.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




13. Toronto Raptors
(added Maceo Baston and Jason Kapono; lost Morris Peterson)

Kapono might not even be as good as Mo Pete, the man whose spot he takes at greater expense. But the big picture in Toronto is that they have three deadly shooters surrounding T.J. Ford and Chris Bosh, so defending the latter two on the pick-and-roll will be a pick-your-poison proposition. Additionally, the more important comparison was improving on Joey Graham -- who inexplicably became the starter last season after the team soured on Peterson -- and Kapono is more than up to that challenge.

In the meantime, don't sleep on Baston. The former Michigan star was a Euroleague stalwart for several years but didn't get a chance to show his goods in Indiana. That's likely to change in Toronto this year, where he'll provide an inexpensive source of frontcourt offense off the pine.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




14. Detroit Pistons
(added Rodney Stuckey and Arron Afflalo)

I'm not sold on Afflalo at all, but Stuckey looks like the real deal, and should give Detroit a second-unit guard who can actually score once in awhile. After watching Flip Murray and Lindsey Hunter hoist brick after brick the past two seasons, Pistons fans are going to think this guy is the second coming of Dave Bing.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



15. Philadelphia 76ers
(added Thaddeus Young and Jason Smith; lost Joe Smith)

The departed Joe Smith was one of the keys to the Sixers' strong second-half run last season, so losing him leaves a dent. On the other hand, they added two first-round picks in Young and Jason Smith, and my guess is the contributions of those two will offset what has been lost.

Not that you'll see much difference in the win column -- I suspect the Sixers will be terrible -- but these moves didn't make the news any worse. Given some of the previous offseason maneuvers by the Billy King regime, that's a victory in itself.


Memphis is number 7?? IMO, he is only basing this information on stats alone because there is no way you can compare the lost of Chucky Atkins to getting somebody like Conley. He isn't even looking at the point guard play.
Image
User avatar
-BHZMAFIA-
 
Posts: 4608
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 9:49 am
Location: Memphis

Postby Anthony15 on Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:51 am

Sacramento at 10?? Hawes isn't going to play much at all and Mikki won't play as well as he did when Kristic was injured for Nets.
Image
User avatar
Anthony15
 
Posts: 4823
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 10:15 am
Location: Denver, Colorado

Postby cyanide on Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:00 am

He forgot about Delfino. Hollinger's on crack again.
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
User avatar
cyanide
Dat steatopygous
 
Posts: 9197
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
Location: US's toque

Postby scrub on Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:09 am

Lakers? What have they done for there team apart from disappoint Kobe. Fisher is an upgrade on Smush Parker but he isn't gonna get them any further.
Corey Brewer - Defensive Player of the Year 08
Image
User avatar
scrub
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 3:05 am
Location: Belfast, Ireland

Postby Sauru on Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:19 am

that list is pretty shitty. some teams belong there, others are laughable. also he starts by saying he is only seeing how the team will be this season compared to last. in that case i feel orlando should have made the list, in the 13-15 range. they may have greatly over payed for lewis but they should definetly be better this coming season.
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby NovU on Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:41 am

haha yeah... funny how orlando's not in the list... i guess the writer thinks Grant Hill = Rashard Lewis or ... (added Thaddeus Young and Jason Smith; lost Joe Smith) > rashard

i think most improved team upcoming season in wins gonna be boston or grizzlies. lol two of the worst team last year... don't think they gonna stay there if healthy
THX TO DOPE-JAO FOR THE SPECIAL SIG! <3
Image
Enjoy! <3 Jao
User avatar
NovU
Crap, what am I going to brag about now?
 
Posts: 11325
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:50 pm

Postby Sauru on Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:55 am

boston should show a dramatic increase in wins since they were not as bad as thier record showed last season. injuries and a bit of the tank cause them to be so bad.
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby JT_55 on Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:07 am

1. Houston Rockets
(added Mike James, Luis Scola, Jackie Butler and Aaron Brooks; lost Juwan Howard and Vassilis Spanoulis; replaced Jeff Van Gundy with Rick Adelman)

While you're focusing on the San Antonio-Dallas-Phoenix triumvirate in the West, don't sleep on Houston. The Rockets have quietly put together a roster that could very well be the last team standing in that conference in 2008.

Start with the decision to replace Van Gundy with Adelman -- a change in direction that will likely make the team more up-tempo and offensive-minded. They'll miss Van Gundy's defensive genius, but given the offensive stagnation this club showed in 2006-07, it's not a bad trade.

Moreover, hiring Adelman was especially important in this case because it basically adds another player to the roster. Bonzi Wells bristled under Van Gundy after showing up out of shape, and hardly played last season. But he seems excited by being reunited with Adelman, who coached him to a strong campaign in Sacramento two years ago.

From there, add in two vastly underrated trades. The first one pilfered James from Minnesota for Howard, giving the Rockets a do-over on the disastrous James-for-Rafer Alston trade two years ago. The second nabbed Scola and Butler from San Antonio in return for Spanoulis.

Scola, a skilled Argentinian who has been one of the best players in Europe for the past half-decade, will make an immediate impact as a starting power forward. Butler, as a young center with strong scoring skills in the post, should energize a second unit that was bereft of offense last season.

In the big picture, the Rockets aggressively addressed their three main problems: stagant offense, point guard and power forward. Between the coaching change, the additions of James and first-round pick Aaron Brooks at the point, the pickups of Scola and Butler up front, and the de facto addition of Wells, this team suddenly looks loaded. At this point in the offseason, nobody has upgraded more than this club.


Wouldn't excatly say Adelman is an improvement over Van Gundy, but I guess getting a motivated Bonzi Wells should be part of the consideration. It's by no means Van Gundy's fault for alienating Wells because he's outta shape.

Scola is the wild-card here. If he's good, then Houston should do well.

2. Charlotte Bobcats
(added Jason Richardson and Jared Dudley; lost Brevin Knight; replaced Bernie Bickerstaff with Sam Vincent)

While cynics will claim that frugal Bobcats owner Robert Johnson only signed off on the Richardson deal because he had to get over the minimum salary floor, there's no question that the deal addressed a huge weakness that has plagued the Cats throughout their existence.

Richardson is a reliable scorer and rebounder -- one that will help push rookie bust Adam Morrison out of the rotation if he struggles again -- and gives the Bobcats a much-needed go-to guy late in games. It also allows sharpshooter Matt Carroll to shift to a more suitable sixth man role, where his defensive shortcomings won't be so glaring. As a late first-rounder, Dudley could be surprisingly effective too -- don't be shocked if he's earning important minutes by season's end. Add it up and a playoff run doesn't seem far-fetched at all.


Unfortunately Richardson is angry and doesn't want to play for Charlotte.

13. Toronto Raptors
(added Maceo Baston and Jason Kapono; lost Morris Peterson)

Kapono might not even be as good as Mo Pete, the man whose spot he takes at greater expense. But the big picture in Toronto is that they have three deadly shooters surrounding T.J. Ford and Chris Bosh, so defending the latter two on the pick-and-roll will be a pick-your-poison proposition. Additionally, the more important comparison was improving on Joey Graham -- who inexplicably became the starter last season after the team soured on Peterson -- and Kapono is more than up to that challenge.

In the meantime, don't sleep on Baston. The former Michigan star was a Euroleague stalwart for several years but didn't get a chance to show his goods in Indiana. That's likely to change in Toronto this year, where he'll provide an inexpensive source of frontcourt offense off the pine.


I'd say Kapono is way better than Mo Pete, but it may just be because of his off-year. And Delfino should provide some depth on the bench.
JT_55
 
Posts: 1135
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 9:36 am
Location: Canada

Postby Indy on Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:29 pm

JT_55 wrote:Unfortunately Richardson is angry and doesn't want to play for Charlotte.


Well, considering that he said he loves the area of North Carolina and is very excited to form a duo with Gerald Wallace, I think you may be off base here. :roll:
Image
User avatar
Indy
 
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:32 pm
Location: Dublin

Postby Dro on Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:27 pm

Indy wrote:
JT_55 wrote:Unfortunately Richardson is angry and doesn't want to play for Charlotte.


Well, considering that he said he loves the area of North Carolina and is very excited to form a duo with Gerald Wallace, I think you may be off base here. :roll:


Yeah, the early reports that he was bummed (not angry) about being traded, but then he changed his tune. Should really do your research before saying stuff like that :)
http://thesportspread.blogspot.com/

^^^Visit my blog! Nothing too interesting, but I try to make a post every day, and I try to go in depth. Please leave lots of negative feedback! I want to become a sports journalist on the side some day, and I know I have a looooooong way to go.

***Note: I had make a new URL because for some reason I couldn't log into the old one...bummer.
Dro
 
Posts: 607
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: The Valley of the Sun

Postby Air Zoom Kobe I on Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:02 pm

Dro wrote:
Indy wrote:
JT_55 wrote:Unfortunately Richardson is angry and doesn't want to play for Charlotte.


Well, considering that he said he loves the area of North Carolina and is very excited to form a duo with Gerald Wallace, I think you may be off base here. :roll:


Yeah, the early reports that he was bummed (not angry) about being traded, but then he changed his tune. Should really do your research before saying stuff like that :)



That means (unless he gets traded) hello Bustland, USA for Adam Morrison. Richardson's gonna take up all of his playing time.
ImageAM I THE ONLY ONE THAT THINKS RASHARD LEWIS COULD HAVE SAVED SEATTLE?
Air Zoom Kobe I
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:31 am
Location: Houston, TX

Postby Andrew on Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:16 pm

John Hollinger wrote:But one thing remains constant: Standing pat is a formula for failure.


Funny, most (if not all) repeat champions have tended to bring back the same roster give or take a couple of players who may not even be part of the core rotation. I do see where he's coming from and it obviously didn't work out for the Heat last season but the decision to keep the same guys and make another run has been successful in the past. It seems to me it's more about knowing when to make sweeping changes and when to make minor adjustments than standing pat inevitably leading to a season going down in flames.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115127
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Jugs on Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:28 pm

Houston improve? Just because they've done the most "changes" doesnt mean they've improved.
Jugs
 
Posts: 7442
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Geelong, Australia

Postby Indy on Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:51 pm

Dro wrote:
Indy wrote:
JT_55 wrote:Unfortunately Richardson is angry and doesn't want to play for Charlotte.


Well, considering that he said he loves the area of North Carolina and is very excited to form a duo with Gerald Wallace, I think you may be off base here. :roll:


Yeah, the early reports that he was bummed (not angry) about being traded, but then he changed his tune. Should really do your research before saying stuff like that :)


Yeah I knew that. You should do your research instead of making outdated comments.
Image
User avatar
Indy
 
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:32 pm
Location: Dublin

Postby Dro on Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:50 am

Indy wrote:
Dro wrote:
Indy wrote:
JT_55 wrote:Unfortunately Richardson is angry and doesn't want to play for Charlotte.


Well, considering that he said he loves the area of North Carolina and is very excited to form a duo with Gerald Wallace, I think you may be off base here. :roll:


Yeah, the early reports that he was bummed (not angry) about being traded, but then he changed his tune. Should really do your research before saying stuff like that :)


Yeah I knew that. You should do your research instead of making outdated comments.


I should've made it more clear that my comment was directed towards JT 55. My bad :cool:
http://thesportspread.blogspot.com/

^^^Visit my blog! Nothing too interesting, but I try to make a post every day, and I try to go in depth. Please leave lots of negative feedback! I want to become a sports journalist on the side some day, and I know I have a looooooong way to go.

***Note: I had make a new URL because for some reason I couldn't log into the old one...bummer.
Dro
 
Posts: 607
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: The Valley of the Sun

Postby Sauru on Sat Jul 21, 2007 4:26 am

Jugs wrote:Houston improve? Just because they've done the most "changes" doesnt mean they've improved.



how much they improved really depends on scola and of course if francis can pass the ball
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby NovU on Sat Jul 21, 2007 11:20 am

no doubt roster looks improved the most in the league
i dunno about chemistry
THX TO DOPE-JAO FOR THE SPECIAL SIG! <3
Image
Enjoy! <3 Jao
User avatar
NovU
Crap, what am I going to brag about now?
 
Posts: 11325
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:50 pm

Postby benji on Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:16 pm

IMO, he is only basing this information on stats alone because there is no way you can compare the lost of Chucky Atkins to getting somebody like Conley.

In my opinion, I doubt he even looked at very many stats. I mean, I don't see any analysis at all in the piece, just a bunch of opinions in a lazy list like most sports writers. And basing a list like this on stats would lead to some different conclusions.

Hollinger isn't a stats guy, he's just a sportswriter. Yeah, he has embraced the value of stats in analysis, and does use them, but he's also a sportswriter/journalist/media figure and therefore his primary goal is to draw attention to himself not inform.

I don't know why a list like this is even out at this point (other than the reason above) as there's still a number of important moves that could happen. And the deciding of rotations, and we still have very little idea how the rookies will impact their teams this season.

Andrew is right in his criticism of the "standing pat" thing, at least for good teams. Which is odd, as John used to bash good teams for making moves just to make moves.

He's really gone downhill since he joined ESPN Insider in my opinion. Especially when he's just making lists all the time. He used to actually analyze things in the books. And I have to wonder how much he's tried to get ESPN to stop just listing the players by PER as if it's "proof" of things.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Postby Sauru on Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:20 pm

i hate how he bashed the standing pat idea. i still feel that if the old warriors team didnt go and trade everyone away they could have competed for a few titles. they had good star power and some nice young tallent(i am referring to the muller,hardaway,latrell,webber, so on days).
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby Indy on Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:45 am

Dro wrote:
Indy wrote:
Dro wrote:
Indy wrote:
JT_55 wrote:Unfortunately Richardson is angry and doesn't want to play for Charlotte.


Well, considering that he said he loves the area of North Carolina and is very excited to form a duo with Gerald Wallace, I think you may be off base here. :roll:


Yeah, the early reports that he was bummed (not angry) about being traded, but then he changed his tune. Should really do your research before saying stuff like that :)


Yeah I knew that. You should do your research instead of making outdated comments.


I should've made it more clear that my comment was directed towards JT 55. My bad :cool:


Sorry, I thought it was you that made the original quote. :cool:
Image
User avatar
Indy
 
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:32 pm
Location: Dublin

Postby Dramacydal on Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:22 am

15. Philadelphia 76ers
(added Thaddeus Young and Jason Smith; lost Joe Smith)

The departed Joe Smith was one of the keys to the Sixers' strong second-half run last season, so losing him leaves a dent. On the other hand, they added two first-round picks in Young and Jason Smith, and my guess is the contributions of those two will offset what has been lost.

Not that you'll see much difference in the win column -- I suspect the Sixers will be terrible -- but these moves didn't make the news any worse. Given some of the previous offseason maneuvers by the Billy King regime, that's a victory in itself.


This is so sad yet so true... :(
User avatar
Dramacydal
 
Posts: 1996
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 4:00 am


Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests