All-Rookie Teams announced

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

All-Rookie Teams announced

Postby Dan's Brain on Wed May 09, 2007 2:10 pm

2006-07 T-Mobile NBA ALL-ROOKIE FIRST TEAM\

Brandon Roy Portland
Andrea Bargnani Toronto
Randy Foye Minnesota
Rudy Gay Memphis
Jorge Garbajosa Toronto
LaMarcus Aldridge Portland


2006-07 T-Mobile NBA ALL-ROOKIE SECOND TEAM

Paul Millsap Utah
Adam Morrison Charlotte
Tyrus Thomas Chicago
Craig Smith Minnesota
Rajon Rondo Boston (tie)
Walter Herrmann Charlotte (tie)
Marcus Williams New Jersey (tie)


Other players receiving votes, with point totals (first place votes): Tarence Kinsey, Memphis, 6 (1); Renaldo Balkman, New York, 5; Rodney Carney, Philadelphia, 5 (1); Shelden Williams, Atlanta, 4; Allan Ray, Boston, 1; Thabo Sefolosha, Chicago, 1; Daniel Gibson, Cleveland, 1; Jordan Farmar, L.A. Lakers, 1; Josh Boone, New Jersey, 1; Sergio Rodriguez, Portland, 1.



Not bad selections. Heaps of them though, 13 players. Is that some sort of record?
User avatar
Dan's Brain
My Manwich!
 
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:08 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Postby Lamrock on Wed May 09, 2007 2:51 pm

Damn, thats a BIG rookie team. I think 13 is a new record. I'm really glad Morrison didn't make the first team.

When will MVP be announced. Wasn't it announced last year at this time?
Image
User avatar
Lamrock
 
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Washington State

Postby Matt on Wed May 09, 2007 3:01 pm

they should give Dirk the MVP during a GSW home game :D
Image
User avatar
Matt
 
Posts: 7236
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:48 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Pistol on Wed May 09, 2007 3:17 pm

Morrison should've made it on first team over Garbage-osa...

Happy about Herrmann though :D
User avatar
Pistol
You have to want it as bad as you need to breath.
 
Posts: 744
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 2:49 pm

Postby Lamrock on Wed May 09, 2007 4:09 pm

trigger42 wrote:Morrison should've made it on first team over Garbage-osa...

Happy about Herrmann though :D

Garbo was one of the best rookies of the eyar. In all honesty, Morrison didn't even deserve 2nd team honors. I mean, he can't do anything but score; and he isn't even that good at that. His nightmarish FG% and lack of impact on a lottery team makes the mere thought of a first-team berth a travesty.
Image
User avatar
Lamrock
 
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Washington State

Postby Andrew on Wed May 09, 2007 10:49 pm

I think I might have even picked a couple of those players to be named to the correct All-Rookie teams in the awards thread, a rare hit amongst a series of misses with my predictions this year. Great to see Thomas make the second team.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115127
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Dan's Brain on Thu May 10, 2007 12:19 am

Morrison should've made it on first team over Garbage-osa...



Morrison should have been rookie of the year. Until he started playing.

Garbajosa was an impact rookie, which was uncommon among this year's class. He definitely deserves to be there ahead of Morrison. Hell, even Tyrus Thomas should have had more votes than him.
User avatar
Dan's Brain
My Manwich!
 
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:08 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Postby grusom on Thu May 10, 2007 12:57 am

Hinrich_12 wrote:


Morrison should have been rookie of the year. Until he started playing.


:D (Y)

I am so disapointed about the year Morrison had - I really expected him to be a good NBA player - a 14 ppg, 4-5 reb, 45% kind of guy.
User avatar
grusom
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Denmark

Postby Its_asdf on Thu May 10, 2007 7:05 am

I knew Morrison would be just another great white hype. There's nothing about his game that really translates well into the NBA except for his ball IQ.
User avatar
Its_asdf
I'm kind of a big deal.
 
Posts: 5462
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Under a Rock in Canada

Postby Lamrock on Thu May 10, 2007 8:04 am

I wonder who will be the better player in the end, Morrison or Van Horn?
Image
User avatar
Lamrock
 
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Washington State

Postby Matt on Thu May 10, 2007 10:55 am

Morrison was going to be ROY, until Michael Jordan drafted him :D
Image
User avatar
Matt
 
Posts: 7236
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:48 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Dan's Brain on Thu May 10, 2007 11:41 am

Lamrock13 wrote:I wonder who will be the better player in the end, Morrison or Van Horn?



Jokes aside, I still think that Morrison can be a serviceable player in the league, but more or less on the level of Mike Dunleavy.

Keith Van Horn went backwards every year in his career after his sophomore season. But he could also still offer a lot to a contending team, looking for that little bit of extra scoring punch. Like the Cavs or Lakers. Well, maybe not the Lakers as he is a defensive black hole.

To the question at hand, I'd say Van Horn. Better rebounder and a better NBA body. Adam Morrison looks like he should be playing mini-golf.
User avatar
Dan's Brain
My Manwich!
 
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:08 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Postby jonthefon on Thu May 10, 2007 2:39 pm

Van Horn averaged...16 or something in his career, and about 7 boards a game too. His field goal percentage wasn't bad either.

If Morrison figures out how to shoot better, and play some D, he could be better than Van Horn
Image
User avatar
jonthefon
Fucking pissed off.
 
Posts: 1598
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:16 pm

Postby TSquared on Thu May 10, 2007 4:09 pm

damn..tyrus shouldve been on the 1st team over morrison
Image
User avatar
TSquared
 
Posts: 538
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: Above the Rim

Postby grusom on Thu May 10, 2007 8:07 pm

TSquared wrote:damn..tyrus shouldve been on the 1st team over morrison


Morrison didn't make the first team.

Van Horn wasn't a bad player - it just hurt him to be drafted the same year as Tim Duncan, as he kind of over shadowed his early succes :-)

I remember someone gave Van Horn a first place vote for ROY over Duncan - at least Morrison didn't get any.
User avatar
grusom
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Denmark

Postby Its_asdf on Thu May 10, 2007 11:38 pm

Lamrock93 wrote:I wonder who will be the better player in the end, Morrison or Van Horn?


Van Horn can play both foward spots, can rebound the ball and can hit shots at a fairly good clip. He's like a 44% career fg shooter, which isn't bad considering he's a 6'10 jumpshooter rather than a low-post banger. He was a solid #2 guy next to Marbury until they started hating each other.

Morrison on the other hand has skills that are below average except for scoring, and even then he still shoots at a piss-poor percentage.
User avatar
Its_asdf
I'm kind of a big deal.
 
Posts: 5462
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Under a Rock in Canada

Postby Indy on Fri May 11, 2007 1:27 am

Keith Van Horn was the perfect example of a guy who the league figured out. There became a blueprint on how to stop him and he was unable to adjust. The same thing happened to Dino Radja, it just happened much faster, and he quickly went back to Europe with his tail between his legs.
Image
User avatar
Indy
 
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:32 pm
Location: Dublin

Postby TSquared on Fri May 11, 2007 1:35 am

hmmm..wonder how the euro players will do next year.. like pecherov.. and the other rookies from this year but are playing only next year.. are they still gonna be considered as rookies next year? or sophomores?
Image
User avatar
TSquared
 
Posts: 538
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: Above the Rim

Postby Its_asdf on Fri May 11, 2007 5:54 am

Players who have yet to play an NBA game are still considered rookies since they have not officially played an NBA game yet.
User avatar
Its_asdf
I'm kind of a big deal.
 
Posts: 5462
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Under a Rock in Canada

Postby Indy on Fri May 11, 2007 7:39 am

Its_asdf wrote:Players who have yet to play an NBA game are still considered rookies since they have not officially played an NBA game yet.


That's not true, if a guy gets drafted and gets DNP-CD every game for the entire season, he still was a rookie. If you get drafted but don't get put on to the roster then you are a rookie whenever you actually join the team, but it has nothing to do with whether or not you play.
Image
User avatar
Indy
 
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:32 pm
Location: Dublin

Postby Andrew on Fri May 11, 2007 3:02 pm

Indy wrote:That's not true, if a guy gets drafted and gets DNP-CD every game for the entire season, he still was a rookie. If you get drafted but don't get put on to the roster then you are a rookie whenever you actually join the team, but it has nothing to do with whether or not you play.


Exceptions seem to be made for players who are under contract but never activated during the course of what should have been their rookie season, usually due to a serious injury. Nick Collison and Speedy Claxton are two examples that come to mind.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115127
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia


Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests