I don't think he'll score 40+ against the Rockets.
Drex wrote:I don't think he'll score 40+ against the Rockets.
Well, he did.
I hate Vujacic. I don't know why I'm saying this in a Kobe-related thread, but I do.
Kobe was on fire in the last 4 minutes, as always, but I've never noticed how much he flops. Almost Manu-like.
Axel wrote:19 of 44 from the field. It's laughable how many shots he's' taking.
lakerskobe247 wrote:I don't think there is anyone else in this league that can make that much while taking that many shots against a sub .500 team, let alone the Rockets while defending T-mac.
BIG GREEN wrote:Scoring alot of points qualifies you as the best player in the game? I didn't know the point of the NBA was to score as much points as possible.
BigKaboom2 wrote:lakerskobe247 wrote:I don't think there is anyone else in this league that can make that much while taking that many shots against a sub .500 team, let alone the Rockets while defending T-mac.
Wouldn't that make it easier?
Drex wrote:He can shoot a los of shots, tooA lot of people can score over 40 on 44 shots.
Yeah, but how many can score 17 in 4 minutes? A lot of people can't score that many in a full game.
Matthew wrote:BIG GREEN wrote:Scoring alot of points qualifies you as the best player in the game? I didn't know the point of the NBA was to score as much points as possible.
lol, how are games won again? I always thought it was to score more then your opposition![]()
dada wrote:First mistake, I wasnt talking to 'you' in particular.
I give the 'fatman' credit. Where did I say I dont. Both players deserve credit for their part in championship teams. All I was pointing out is how people sing on what has Kobe done without Shaq when the same applies for Shaq regarding to swingmen.
Rodman played 80 games so I'm not sure exactly how he missed so many games that season but Pippen did so in only playing 44. At the eend of the day his teams were still top to bottom better in terns of having a strong veteran presence.
Regarding Pippen's play without MJ, yes he did play well albeit with a still solid team. I'm sure he wouldnt dream of playing beside a Sasha, Sham and a Smush. He didnt win any titles either and in comparison between him and Kobe's play after losing their star teammates I wouldnt gives Pips anything over what Kobe has done.
Oh gosh the one tired argument that seems to be played over and over like an old broken record. Please tell me that everyone in the league didnt know that if you whispered in Jordans ear they called a foul. Thinking that handchecking would magically take off 20 pts off Kobe's career average is just ridiculous. Kobe would have the same success back then as he is having now. Todays average athlete is biger, stronger, faster and just as smart as players back then. What used to be tricks of the trade that could make one players career back then is now common knowledge. In regards to scouting and match preparation, today's game is in no may inferior to the league of yesteryear. Also, saying the league isnt physical is nonsense to me. Yes physical play is frowned upon but I dont see anyone is skirts driving down the lane. You still get fouled hard in todays game, Kobe can tell you about it.
What Jordan did was amazing yes but you still have to put in into context. Both players were not presented with identical situations so you cant compare what each has done bone for bone as if they played in the same time. Jordan got fouled hard many times driving down the lane, and he got his calls many times as well. Lets please not pretend like he was battered every single minute of the game and no calls were made. Kobe got hit in the playoffs as well, just because his clothesline wasnt on NBA Hardwood Classics doesnt mean it only tickled. He piled on freethrows the same way players like Kobe, Wade and Lebron do. Also, many people who watch alot of LA games know that he doesnt get all the calls in the same manner as the other players discussed.
A very childish presumption to think that by simply posting Jordans career stats and accomplishments against a player of Kobe Bryants caliber who is in the middle of his career and establishing himself as a sure Hall-of-Famer nullify any argument I can make to support his case as a living basketball legend. Jordan had his time and Kobe is currently going through his. In term of whats being brought to the table I dont think theres any astounding difference that would set anyone one of them miles ahead of the other when placed in context. Yes Jordan has alot of trophies but who is to say Kobe will finish with his current 3. Kobe can be discussed in the same breath of Jordan, one would be foolish to discredit his accomplishments that allow him such status.
You basically took this one sentence:How can we compare Jordan leading a team of vets with Kobe leading a team of spermbuds?
...and ran with it.
I made that comment because of the many people saying he cant bring his teams to a higher level but I suppose in that same conversation we shouldnt consider the players made available to both. Pfft, I call bollocks. You think belittling his 1st round team in any way, shape or form diminishes this guys staus as an extraordinary player or takes away from a very solid year as a team? I'm not disheartened by his exit considering at the beginning of the year everybody called them a lottery team. Then when they won 40+ game people arguedagainst his MVP merit saying he has to at least help them to 50 to be in the conversation. Then LA was supposedly swept out of the first round by Phoenix but ask any Phoenix player and theyll tell you it was a tough series. All this with a lottery bound team, surely worthy of credit from my perspective. Jordan was exceptional, but having role players like Kerr, Harper, Rodman, Kukoc etc etc sure made it even sweeter for him.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests