Wed Jul 19, 2006 4:59 am
Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:07 am
Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:36 am
Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:40 am
Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:55 am
Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:57 am
Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:04 am
Its_asdf wrote:Its not like most of Seattle gives a shit about the Sonics anyway.
Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:15 am
Its_asdf wrote:Its not like most of Seattle gives a shit about the Sonics anyway. Let them go to a place where they are actually appreciated.
Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:20 am
NJNetsFan wrote:Portland's most likely to move next. They've been having problems with making money.
Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:26 am
Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:49 am
Wankster wrote:I think las Vegas, Pittsburgh, San Diego, and Arizona should get teams.
Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:56 am
Montana should get a team
Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:03 am
Who the hell lives in Montana???
Anyway, I think San Francisco, San Diego, Tampa Bay, and Baltimore should be candidates...
If New Jersey does move to Brooklyn (please god, no...) then I think they should get another one...
Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:04 am
Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:10 am
Maryland is small so it doesnt really matter, then you gonna have to give a team to new hampshire and vermont.
Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:14 am
Sonics Sold To Oklahoma City Group
18th July, 2006 - 3:52 pm
Seattlepi.com - An Oklahoma City group has agreed to buy the Seattle SuperSonics and the Seattle Storm.
In February, majority owner Howard Schultz threatened to possibly move or sell the city's oldest major league professional sports franchise, saying the team has lost about $60 million in the past five years
The team scheduled a 3 p.m. press conference to officially announce the sale. Sources indicate the new ownership group plans to keep the Sonics and Storm in the Seattle region.
Anyway, I think San Francisco, San Diego, Tampa Bay, and Baltimore should be candidates...
Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:23 am
And although the announcement will say the new owners will try to make a go of it in Seattle, they could move the team to Oklahoma City as soon as the 2007-08 season. Even though the lease at KeyArena runs through 2010, the city has claimed it loses money every time the Sonics play — so some sort of buyout could be made in the near future.
Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:32 am
but I think 30 teams is more than enough.
Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:09 am
Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:34 am
They should make two new teams and put the league up to 32.
Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:46 am
Warriors, Clippers, Lakers, Kings.. uh oh.BlueHornet wrote:Thats true but i dont think that cali should have 4 teams, thats rediculous
Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:10 am
Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:29 pm
Fenix wrote:San Francisco already has a team - Golden State Warriors.
Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:19 pm
Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:37 pm
BlueHornet wrote:Who the hell lives in Montana???
Anyway, I think San Francisco, San Diego, Tampa Bay, and Baltimore should be candidates...
If New Jersey does move to Brooklyn (please god, no...) then I think they should get another one...
Thats true but i dont think that cali should have 4 teams, thats rediculous, florida has miami and orlando, Maryland is small so it doesnt really matter, then you gonna have to give a team to new hampshire and vermont.
Any teams in missouri, or mississippi