Riot wrote:Anthony15 wrote:Yes, I'm so glad that KG didn't make it!!!
Is it because he has you and your sorry franchise's number?
sure....WTF r u talkin about?
Fitzy wrote:vince carter got snobbed to!
keepnitgangsta1 wrote:Pierce got snubbed. KG didn't desrve it, imo. The Wolves lost too many games.
Donatello wrote:I am simply amazed at Shaq getting first team. What the bloody hell is that about?
IT DOES NOT MATTER WHICH TEAMS WON GAMES. It's about individual performances. Garnett should have beaten Duncan in this vote.
Riot wrote:Anthony15 wrote:Riot wrote:Anthony15 wrote:Yes, I'm so glad that KG didn't make it!!!
Is it because he has you and your sorry franchise's number?
sure....WTF r u talkin about?
I'm saying Denver sucks.
baldus_2004 wrote:Hey Riot, since when was the game of basketball a game of numbers. You wanna make a case for a player based on numbers then lets talk about baseball. Hoops is far more complicated that numbers. I mean, Stephon Marbary has been good for about 22/8 every year, so do you think he is going to make the Hall of Fame? No, because he is a loser. Do you think Bruce Bowen is a worthless piece of crap because his numbers suck? What about Ben Wallace? Aside from rebounds, steals, and blocks, he sucks donkey balls. There is no stat for how good someone's offball and help defense is. There is no stat for how good of a leader someone is or how many double teams they draw to open up wide open drives for guys like Tony Parker and Manu Ginobli. Duncan is what all NBA players should strive to be.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests