dadamafia wrote:magius wrote:cassell's too ugly. i have to give the edge to marbury here.
lol So you think Marbury is cute?
fgrep15 wrote:Cassell is a winner. What seperates Cassell from Marbury is leadership [though that seperates him from a lot of guys in the league], and his clutch abilities.
If you're saying who's more talented, of course Marbury, but till Cassell can't walk on the court anymore, I don't think many would take Marbury overh im.
Amphatoast wrote:yes well in short whenever he leaves the team gets blessed with someone else coming in and filling in for him. He had keith van horn too, remember the #2 pick behind tim duncan
but "good things" happen when he leaves, so maybe something good will happen to the knicks if it happens
Amphatoast wrote:yes well in short whenever he leaves the team gets blessed with someone else coming in and filling in for him. He had keith van horn too, remember the #2 pick behind tim duncan
but "good things" happen when he leaves, so maybe something good will happen to the knicks if it happens
benji wrote:We're still on that stupidity? Giving Kidd the MVP in 2002 is as bad as giving Nash the MVP in any year...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests