
Jae wrote:what exactly is "it"? this post sounds like you're talking about GM'ing ability, (correct if i'm wrong), we're discussing the validity of NBA 'expert' anaysts based on actual nba experience
"It" would be refering to the amount of credibility I give to players opinions. And yes I am aware of what the topic is
of course no one should not take all of Pippen's thoughts & opinions as gospel. but considering all the achievements & experience on his resume and the numerous amount of great players he has played with & against, his opinions do have credibility/validity. And that's probably why he was hired by ABC. certainly he didn't make it there on his good looks or for being well spokenWhen espn's 'expert' panel of Anthony, legler, or Tolbert give their thoughts about certain playerss, it doesn't mean squat since they were scrubs in the NBA.
You listed Greg Anthony as one of "those" guys (funnily enough he played with Pippen) who also played with a number of great players and had years of experience in the play-offs. Sure he wasn't the star Pippen was, but why would his opinion be any less valid? Obviously on some matters he wouldn't be as experienced (participating in the Olympics, winning a championship, playing with Jordan etc) but as far as I'm concerned since those specific events aren't being discussed, I don't see why his opinion of Kevin Garnett (for example) should be seen as any less valid or credible than Pippen's.
It's not like watching the Timberwolves requires a gold medal or a few DPOY's. Being a great player doesn't guarantee that you can evaluate a player better than someone who wasn't as good. By this reasoning we should all be going to Jordan for his views on everything and anything that happens in the NBA and ignoring everyone else.
The other guys, the ones who never played but scored jobs as "analysts" I would definitely take the word of a player over them. When it comes to the former players though, I don't really know why a few media voted awards and better statistics would really impact the validity of their opinion any. I do see your point though, I just don't 100% agree.
MetalHead wrote:Can someone add a poll option: Who gives a shit? These days these hermit-old players have nothing else to do but gamble, drink, play golf and talk about the "good old days".
Yohance Bailey wrote:Pippin has been talking alot of shit since he retired indeed....dude is a jaded relic. If anybody was overrated..it's him..he couldnt do shit without jordan.
magius wrote:Riot wrote:magius wrote:don't agree with it unless you think kg is the best player in the league. in that case i could see where pip is coming from. sorry riot.
Kevin Garnett and Kobe Bryant are the best players on the league, and really there isn't anyone that close to them either.
1. duncan
2. kg/kobe
3. wade/lebron
Only person who can talk about overate or quality is Michael Jordan, so shut the fck up Pip' and go play some golf!

Bang wrote:It's because Scottie Pippen never got the credit he deserved, so he now calls anyone who is about as good as him or is better than him and gets better credit as overrated. I'd be bitter too if I were probably one of the best guards ever, forced to take small salaries (during his best years), always under Jordan's shadow and never receiving much credit for it.
jeffx wrote:That's what I'm saying...who gives a f--- what Pippen thinks? He has a right to his opinion, but I have the right to ignore it.
KG is good, but I don't think he's overrated... I would rank several other forwards above him...
1. Brand
2. Nowitzki
3. Duncan
4. Melo
5. KG
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests