Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:40 pm
wtf....Robinson...best dunker ever....you must be trippin'...
Anyways i take Spud anyday
Anyways i take Spud anyday
Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:57 pm
Judging by AG's previous posts in this thread, I'd hazard a guess that he was being sarcastic with his equations.
Tue Feb 21, 2006 8:31 pm
definitely Spud....I don't think Spud took 14 tries for his dunks....plus he was revolutionary for the little guys 
Tue Feb 21, 2006 8:41 pm
Andrew wrote:Judging by AG's previous posts in this thread, I'd hazard a guess that he was being sarcastic with his equations.
My bad
Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:50 pm
Like Matthew said, Spud was the one who paved the way for guys like Nate. I could prevent world hunger before Nate could complete a single dunk, which really bogged down my enjoyment of the dunk contest.
Wed Feb 22, 2006 8:41 am
Andrew wrote:Judging by AG's previous posts in this thread, I'd hazard a guess that he was being sarcastic with his equations.
i stand by what i say
Wed Feb 22, 2006 9:28 am
Spud, DEFINETLY.
I mean, Nate is much cooler than spud, but spud is smaller, and he can make his dunks way more fluently.
Nate had 14 tries on one dunk. That's just crazy.
I mean, Nate is much cooler than spud, but spud is smaller, and he can make his dunks way more fluently.
Nate had 14 tries on one dunk. That's just crazy.
Wed Feb 22, 2006 9:30 am
spudnate 
Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:19 pm
Spud. He's who all short people aspire to be!
Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:49 am
Spud is the one to choose, Nate's got it going on too.
But Spud for now.
But Spud for now.