How the heck would you know? Has he even played more than 1 minute in the NBA?axare wrote:Pavel is Underrated...
Tim Duncan is overrated, he's messing it up this year. In comparison to his previous years of course. He's not even clearly the best player on his team anymore, well maybe he is but not by far as it used to be.
cklitsie wrote:In comparison to his previous years of course.
I hate the Tim Duncan fan club rolling into town. I also believe after previous instances that Dweaver should be banned from commenting on anything related to the NBA. Tell me all about the "excruciating" foot pain Dweaver, are you his doctor?
1. Many more players play/have played through injuries (Iverson?)
2. He has averaged way better before, he's in his prime now so he's supposed to go up rather than down.
3. So Sean Marks is MVP material too? His team is atop the West and second in the standings as well.
4.
In comparison to his previous years of course.
5. Let's ignore the tiny difference between Weis and Duncan for now; a skilled big man is supposed to draw defenders closer to the basket and open up space on the outside. I've heard Tony Parker leads the league in FGs in the paint. Hmm..
So judging from your reactions (no not yours DWeaver) TD isn't overrated, but he has definately been dissapointing and underachieving this year. There's no point denying that.
Underrated:
Brad Miller
The list of top efficiency players is generally your list of superstars. KG, LBJ, Brand, Dirk, AI, Duncan, etc.. until you get to #22: Brad Miller. His 21.38 is pretty close to Kidd (21.84), McGrady (21.96) and Yao Ming (21.23), but he's never mentioned with these guys. And his 5.5 assists per game would be PG worthy.
Shane Battier
Accurate as hell, .511 FG% .431 3P%. Strong on-man defender and help defender, with 1.06 spg and 1.32 bpg. Does his share on the boards, pulls 5 rpg. All this and for less salary than Brian Cardinal, he gets just under $5 million this year.
Indy wrote:Stupid comment Ceekay.
Overrated:
Manu Ginobili- Manu is a 15/4 type player, and that's all. If you bring up the two names Manu and Stephen Jackson, most people would say that Manu is by far a better player, and I wouldn't disagree that Manu is better, but his numbers are worse in points, the same in rebounds, and his field goal percentage is only about 4-5 percent better.
Underrated:
Stephen Jackson- See Manu Ginobili comparison. The guy really is a stud in many ways. He is a winner, for one, and what people don't realize is that he can be a very viable second option. His defense is highly underrated, all you need to do is watch him to recognize that. (VanK) And, when he catches fire, he can really catch fire (See yesterdays blowout of the Kings in which he made 5 threes in the 3rd quarter, and made 4 threes in a row in 4 straight trips up the court.)
3 ppg.
maes wrote:Underrated:
Brad Miller
The list of top efficiency players is generally your list of superstars. KG, LBJ, Brand, Dirk, AI, Duncan, etc.. until you get to #22: Brad Miller. His 21.38 is pretty close to Kidd (21.84), McGrady (21.96) and Yao Ming (21.23), but he's never mentioned with these guys. And his 5.5 assists per game would be PG worthy.
Yao Ming is over-rated. Well, maybe not entirely over rated, I just hear too much about how he's going to tear it up. Do it already.
Shaq- He's not as good as he was, but he's still spoken about as the most dominant player in the game. He'll never be a 20-10 guy again, not by a long shot, and this isn't even a biased comment when I say he is not the best O'Neal in the Eastern Conference.
maes wrote:Overrated is hard to say, depends on expectations i guess.
Underrated:
Brad Miller
The list of top efficiency players is generally your list of superstars. KG, LBJ, Brand, Dirk, AI, Duncan, etc.. until you get to #22: Brad Miller. His 21.38 is pretty close to Kidd (21.84), McGrady (21.96) and Yao Ming (21.23), but he's never mentioned with these guys. And his 5.5 assists per game would be PG worthy.
Matthew wrote:PER is not the be all and end all when comparing players.
A PER is a much accurate system of efficiency scoring because it's based on a per minute efficiency
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests