Larry Brown vs. Stephon Marbury, Round One!

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Larry Brown vs. Stephon Marbury, Round One!

Postby Jeffx on Sat Nov 19, 2005 4:10 am

Jeffx
 
Posts: 3267
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 4:09 am
Location: Bronx, New York

Re: Larry Brown vs. Stephon Marbury, Round One!

Postby designmatrix on Sat Nov 19, 2005 4:22 am

Jeffx wrote:You knew it was coming. :)

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baske ... 2275c.html


Marbury simply needs to go. Only problem is nobody wants him.
User avatar
designmatrix
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:44 am

Postby dada on Sat Nov 19, 2005 4:33 am

I agree with Brown, Marbury never really has won anywhere doing things his way so he just needs to calm down and be patient.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:02 pm

Postby BIG GREEN on Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:41 am

Marbury's talent is obviously good...too bad his attitude isnt. Who can the knicks get that is better than he though?...
Image
A big fan of the emerald hue and much higher state of being/
Yohance "thug" Bailey on the scene...now known as Big Green/
User avatar
BIG GREEN
 
Posts: 4413
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 1:18 pm
Location: Bronx, New york

Postby Kbryant8 on Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:48 am

Yohance Bailey wrote:Marbury's talent is obviously good...too bad his attitude isnt. Who can the knicks get that is better than he though?...


Nate should try :lol:
Image
LA LAKERS 2009 NBA CHAMPS!!!
My photoshop thread
User avatar
Kbryant8
CHAMPS!
 
Posts: 1864
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:02 am
Location: Estonia

Postby dada on Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:51 am

i was thinking about that while i was reading it earlier, they should bench marbury for a game (for all that blabbing) and let nate run the show and see how he does.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:02 pm

Postby BIG GREEN on Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:54 am

I can't believe i forgot about nate. They should try running the two of them together..with marbury at SG. What the team would lack in size (which it always has since Ewing) they would make for in speed and athleticism.
Image
A big fan of the emerald hue and much higher state of being/
Yohance "thug" Bailey on the scene...now known as Big Green/
User avatar
BIG GREEN
 
Posts: 4413
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 1:18 pm
Location: Bronx, New york

Postby Kbryant8 on Sat Nov 19, 2005 5:56 am

Yohance Bailey wrote:I can't believe i forgot about nate. They should try running the two of them together..with marbury at SG. What the team would lack in size (which it always has since Ewing) they would make for in speed and athleticism.


Like i have heard Larry doesn`t trust rookies.in philadelphia was the same problem.
Yeah nate should try.
Image
LA LAKERS 2009 NBA CHAMPS!!!
My photoshop thread
User avatar
Kbryant8
CHAMPS!
 
Posts: 1864
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:02 am
Location: Estonia

Postby Flasher on Sat Nov 19, 2005 6:09 am

Didn't Iverson have the similar arguments with Larry Brown and eventually accepted it?
Flasher
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:42 am

Postby Kbryant8 on Sat Nov 19, 2005 6:50 am

Flasher wrote:Didn't Iverson have the similar arguments with Larry Brown and eventually accepted it?


Larry says:
"He told me he wanted to play like the way I used Allen (in Philadelphia). Well, I had Eric Snow, Larry Hughes, Aaron McKie. It's a little different now."
Image
LA LAKERS 2009 NBA CHAMPS!!!
My photoshop thread
User avatar
Kbryant8
CHAMPS!
 
Posts: 1864
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:02 am
Location: Estonia

Postby Fenix on Sat Nov 19, 2005 6:58 am

No, he didn't :lol:. LB surrendered and put Eric Snow at PG to guard the opposing shooting guards and Iverson played off guard. I doubt that Brown will do the same with Marbury, while they don't have any true PGs on the roster. Wouldn't it be great if Isiah threw the MLE to someone they could actually use, like Jaric? Even Watson would be a better fit. Nobody would be able to defend SG with Earl at one and Marbury at two, but it's not like anybody does it right now :lol:.
"Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team." (Scottie Pippen, #33)
User avatar
Fenix
There's no I in threesome
 
Posts: 3015
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:32 pm
Location: Slovenia

Postby Its_asdf on Sat Nov 19, 2005 1:15 pm

Nobody wants Marbury, and probably the only GM foolish enough to trade for him would be Isiah Thomas.....
User avatar
Its_asdf
I'm kind of a big deal.
 
Posts: 5462
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Under a Rock in Canada

Postby Gator on Sat Nov 19, 2005 1:59 pm

Marbury is amazing, I don't know why he's struggling.. :roll:
Image
Gator
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 7:47 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby Andrew on Sat Nov 19, 2005 4:09 pm

I'm not a Knicks fan, but it was a good read nevertheless. It'll be interesting to see whom the Knicks' upper management sides with, Larry Brown or Isiah Thomas. Logic would suggest it would be Brown seeing as though he's been a successful coach while Thomas hasn't had much success in the front office, though you never know. Logic hasn't seemed to play a part in a great deal of the Knicks' decisions.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115122
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Matt on Sat Nov 19, 2005 4:29 pm

the only chance Knicks are going to get of winning is to let Marbury play his way, except, pass up on a shot or two here and there. Defense would also be a good idea.
Image
User avatar
Matt
 
Posts: 7236
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:48 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Matthew on Sat Nov 19, 2005 8:49 pm

LB surrendered and put Eric Snow at PG to guard the opposing shooting guards and Iverson played off guard.

Yeah putting Iverson at shooting guard really hurt the sixers. The reason they did this is becuase they picked up Snow midway through the season and wanted to play both Snow and Iverson on the court at the same time. Of cousre, snow is as offensively challanged as some piston fans out there so they put him in charge of running the offense whilst AI was playing shooting guard. Its not like Iverson demanded it.

Nobody wants Marbury, and probably the only GM foolish enough to trade for him would be Isiah Thomas.....

Yeah Thomas is the only idiot GM out there isnt he? Its not like theres GM's out there that trade Shaq, Draft Darko ahead of Wade/bosh/melo, its not like there is GM's out there that trade patrick ewing for shandon anderson and howard eisley which killed the knicks cap for years before thomas even arrived.

Isiah sure is a one of a kind idiot isnt he?
User avatar
Matthew
 
Posts: 5812
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 7:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby magius on Sat Nov 19, 2005 10:08 pm

i dont think isiah has done that bad of a job, he's just taken some risks, but considering what he had to work with, he had no choice. blame layden.
User avatar
magius
 
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 3:37 pm

Postby Fenix on Sat Nov 19, 2005 10:41 pm

Matthew wrote:
LB surrendered and put Eric Snow at PG to guard the opposing shooting guards and Iverson played off guard.

Yeah putting Iverson at shooting guard really hurt the sixers. The reason they did this is becuase they picked up Snow midway through the season and wanted to play both Snow and Iverson on the court at the same time. Of cousre, snow is as offensively challanged as some piston fans out there so they put him in charge of running the offense whilst AI was playing shooting guard. Its not like Iverson demanded it.


I never said putting AI at the SG hurt the Sixers. I only tried to make a point that LB tried to make AI play 'the right way', but in the end he backed off a little and saw that the things aren't going to finish well this way and that someone needs to be brought to play along AI. THAT's why Snow came. In fact, I got a feeling that you're trying to persuade me something I had never even denied. You're shadow boxing way, way too much.
"Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team." (Scottie Pippen, #33)
User avatar
Fenix
There's no I in threesome
 
Posts: 3015
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:32 pm
Location: Slovenia

Postby 1CenT on Sun Nov 20, 2005 3:22 am

Basically, knicks' roster is not good enough to win playing the right or wrong way..
b/c a lot of teams are actually playing the right way nowadays, and they are better teams..

All i know is, Marbury can't be getting every1 involve and attacking whenever he is suppose to, if he can do that.. well.. he'll become a great great player... He shouldnt have talked, he should be challenging himself to play under brown's sytem and suceed in it, to prove every1 wrong... but i guess he is weak and can't take change...

In my opinion, Marbury can't really be a AI type of scorer and win.. He should play off guard at times tho
1CenT
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 5:32 am

Postby dan_suth on Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:58 am

Matthew wrote:Yeah Thomas is the only idiot GM out there isnt he? Its not like theres GM's out there that trade Shaq, Draft Darko ahead of Wade/bosh/melo, its not like there is GM's out there that trade patrick ewing for shandon anderson and howard eisley which killed the knicks cap for years before thomas even arrived.

Isiah sure is a one of a kind idiot isnt he?


You're right, Joe Dumars is terrible for the Pistons.. :roll:
User avatar
dan_suth
 
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:04 pm
Location: Auburn Hills, Michigan

Postby Doobie on Sun Nov 20, 2005 5:28 am

He was trying to imply that all GM's make mistakes , and people shouldn't be burning Isiah for the moves he has done .
New York Knicks
User avatar
Doobie
didn't do it.
 
Posts: 3662
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 3:51 am
Location: NYC

Postby putodelagoa on Sun Nov 20, 2005 6:17 am

It's human to make mistakes. Isiah just happens to be more human than the average gm... :)
User avatar
putodelagoa
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 2:09 am
Location: Portugal

Postby Jeffx on Sun Nov 20, 2005 8:06 am

putodelagoa wrote:It's human to make mistakes. Isiah just happens to be more human than the average gm... :)


That's what I'm saying. There's no getting around it, Isiah did a horrible, horrible job with this roster. Did Isiah forget how his Pistons won championships? Why go the opposite way, especially if you're going to hire Larry Brown. This is f-ing ridiculous.

To make matters worse, Knicks are saddled with more bad contracts. I had high hopes when Isiah took over, but he's as bad as Layden.
Jeffx
 
Posts: 3267
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 4:09 am
Location: Bronx, New York

Postby Matthew on Sun Nov 20, 2005 10:37 am

I never said putting AI at the SG hurt the Sixers

You made it sound like Brown did it just to keep the peace in philly. It turned out to be a brilliant move and one that helped Philly make the finals in 2001.
I only tried to make a point that LB tried to make AI play 'the right way', but in the end he backed off a little and saw that the things aren't going to finish well this way and that someone needs to be brought to play along AI.

But people claim that Brown is so stubborn and set in his ways that he doesnt change his style for the better of his teamates. Look at the pistons. Brown guides them to a championship and a chauncey billups 3 pointer away from back to back championships and they try to blame him for their offensive "struggles". They're such idiots, seriously.
That's what I'm saying. There's no getting around it, Isiah did a horrible, horrible job with this roster. Did Isiah forget how his Pistons won championships? Why go the opposite way, especially if you're going to hire Larry Brown. This is f-ing ridiculous.

Thats not true. The only move Isiah made with brown as head coach was the curry trade. Brown will get the players he wants, and Isiah will assist him in that. Remember in philly, the most important trade brown made was trading stackhouse for mckie and ratliff. At the time, who would have ever thought Ratliff would have ended up being the defensive gem and all star he turned out to be.
To make matters worse, Knicks are saddled with more bad contracts. I had high hopes when Isiah took over, but he's as bad as Layden.

Has Isiah signed Allan houston to a 100 million dollar deal? Did he trade Ewing for Rice, then rice and a future first round pick for shandon anderson and howard eisley? Did he sign Chris Childs and Charlie Ward to ridiculous contracts? Did he trade Latrell Sprewell for Keith Van horn? Did he trade Marcus Camby and Nene for Mcdyess? The only mistake that Isiaih has done is take risks with (talented) players. It hasnt worked so far, but Marbury, Crawford, Richardson, Curry all have opportunities to be much better under brown. You just have to give it some time. Also dont forget the excellent job he has done in the draft: Ariza, Frye, Robinson, Lee.. there is a future there in those players.
User avatar
Matthew
 
Posts: 5812
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 7:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby maes on Sun Nov 20, 2005 10:43 am

Both Marbury and Brown sound like tough people to work with. I don't think this is all Marbury's fault, plenty of winning coaches believe in letting the players take advantage of the situation as it develops and not necessarily follow a set play every time, like D'Antoni.
“Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.”
#23
maes
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:58 am
Location: Chicago

Next

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests