HISTORY POLE

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Which is the most storied and stable NBA franchise (if you consider chapmionships-playoff seasons-finals appearances-winning)

BOSTON CELTICS (16 CHAMPS, 19 FINALS, 46/59 PLAYOFF SEASONS, ONE OF THE BAA/NBA CHARTER FRANCHISES WITH THE BIGGEST AND GREATEST DYNASTY EVER,6 CONSECUTIVE SEASONS OUT OF PLAYOFFS DURING 90s and barely above .500 during LA 3 champs in 2000s,.589 WIN PCT)
6
32%
LOS ANGELES LAKERS (14 CHAMPS, 28 FINALS, 52/57 PLAYOFF SEASONS, THE BAA/NBAs FIRST DYNASTY-TEAM OF THE 80s-7 FINALS APPEARANCES IN THE 60s DURING CELTICS DYNASTY, 61.6 WIN PCT)
13
68%
 
Total votes : 19

Postby Jona on Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:49 am

Cut the crap man, really, it's starting to get annoying. :?
Jona - Rush Fan
Image
User avatar
Jona
 
Posts: 2659
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 7:41 am
Location: Santiago, Chile

Postby cypruslakersfan on Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:01 am

don't worry Jona i stopped already...
cypruslakersfan
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 1:16 am

Postby Jona on Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:05 am

cypruslakersfan wrote:don't worry Jona i stopped already...


That's good to hear. (Y)
Jona - Rush Fan
Image
User avatar
Jona
 
Posts: 2659
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 7:41 am
Location: Santiago, Chile

Postby Drex on Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:10 am

i would like to hear you speak greek some day!!!

That would be awful...and so it would be you speaking Chilean :P OK, I won't reply anymore, let the Lakermania continue (Y)
Image
User avatar
Drex
You bastards!!!
 
Posts: 6074
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 10:48 am
Location: Iquique, Chile

Postby air gordon on Mon Aug 22, 2005 12:41 pm

the lakers have no business of being ahead of the celtics (N)
Jump.
Scott Skiles answer to the question on how Eddy Curry can become a better rebounder
User avatar
air gordon
 
Posts: 7867
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 4:06 pm
Location: windy city

Postby cypruslakersfan on Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:01 pm

well air gordon...a dynasty is a dynasty...but it isn't THE teams history!!!! :? everybody has to say a good word for the 60s Celtics but not a bad one for the 90s Celtics...However you hear people yelling about the Lakers of the 60s inability to take a championship against Boston (they were finals bounded though) but none of them remembers that the Celtics weren't in the Finals even once when the Lakers made the three-peat...these are two different stradegies:(1) LAKERS 2004: Well I haven't lost in the Finals for such a long time...i missed it!!! (Pistons beat LA, and Celts fans cheer about it bigger than Pistons fans-For them it was like winning a championship)......(2) CELTICS (2002):I don't want to go to the finals because maybe i will lose... :roll:
cypruslakersfan
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 1:16 am

Previous

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests