And Batman, Webber was thought to be at the top before he even entered the league. The guy was a beast in college and with the Warriors. He gets a bad rap simply because of his recent years along with his failure to lead a team when it matters.
Amphatoast wrote:ok im just curious why you people put karl malone over tim duncan?
Not trying to say Malone is no good, but why Malone over a
-2 time MVP
-2 time NBA Champ
-2 time Finals MVP
-All star every year
-All NBA Team every year
-All Defensive NBA Team Every Year
-Double Double average Every Year
-A guy whose skill is not 'flashy' and shows that fundamental aspects are good enough
Mick wrote:And Horace Grant wasn't a bad player either. Not top-10 material, but worth a look. It was his speed and rebounding which helped enable the Bulls first three championships.
Jae wrote:
I know he does alright in the NBA
ManuGinobili!!! wrote:talking about Duncan:Jae wrote:
I know he does alright in the NBA
these kind of quotes are what makes so many opinions in this forum worthless. He does alright in the NBA??? What makes you say that?
How can you be overrated when you've led your team to 2 (soon to be 3) NBA titles???
had my username been karl_malone, or sir_charles_barkley, he wouldnt like those players either
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests