If they have lost 6 consecutives, is too bad, they have to start playing harder.
Does any team in a bad streak need to get rid of the only superstar they have?
If they trade Payton, do you see them capable of getting any wins? Seattle is not trading Payton for some fool, and at the moment there are not superstars on the trade market other than Spree and if they refused the Knicks offer, means that the Knicks didn't want to offer Spree to them or Seattle wants a PG to substitute Payton there.
6 games, how many lost games have Cleveland? Are you thinking before posting?, I don't think you are trying your best, use some logic and you will see 6 games is just a bad moment, the Lakers have been thru that, even the Kings have had that. You are making 6 lost games a big deal, this is not NBA Live 2003, this is the real thing. They will not make the playoffs but you can't think that 6 games are going to make disappear a team throwing away the best player they have. Think a little before posting, your short post about the same thing are annoying.
Eg. 6 lost games, 6 lost games. Come with facts explaining what are the reasons the Sonics should trade Payton, do you think Payton is the responsible for those loses?
I knew that GP would leave!
Guys, that's what scubilete said to me, and he was like so proud of what he have said.
You told me to use my logic, hahahhaha!!!
Say: " You were right, I was wrong." to me if you are still a man.[/quote]