5-12FG's vs Utah
10-21FG's vs Indiana
9-24FG's vs Washington
5-18FG's vs Detroit
fgrep15 wrote:Bottomline is Nash is what got the Suns to the #1 record in the league. They didn't even make the Playoffs last year. That's an MVP.
That's like saying the Wizards didn't even make the playoffs last year so Jamison should be MVP![]()
I'm not saying that isn't relevant, but I think I already said it, before anyone says that nonsense they have to realize they also didn't have Q-Rich last season, Amare missed 27 games last season, they had no PG, and they weren't even playing to win anymore after a while.
Jackal wrote:Amare doesn't need Steve Nash per se, all he needs is a playmaker. He'll finish.
Phoenix has no playmaker at the moment, thus Amare can't finish. Amare did well the years before because of Stephon, he was also a playmaker.
Steve is a big factor, but he's not the sole factor. I think fgrep was the one to say that if you put in some other PG, they would be doing fine. Amare's stats wouldn't be what you just showed us, playmaker + Amare = good stats.
No playmaker + Amare = not good stats.
The keyword is playmaker, not Steve.
What you say really makes no sense. You're basically giving a "what if" for MVP candidates. What they would do on other teams means nothing. How valuable to the one they are on is what matters.
Honestly, if those are the standards you use, how could anyone be a legit MVP? We could sit here and play the exchange game with players and we could always find someone who would do a similar job. Even if we did that, it'd still be theory... Something that isn't considered a factor in determining the MVP award.
Whether or not Nash is the MVP is debatable. But c'mon, don't make the "you could put any play maker on their team" argument. You don't know that. It's a "what if." I think Duncan and Garnett cancel each other out. Should they be ruled out of the MVP voting because of that!?
Did the Wizards have the best record in the league?
John WB wrote:Bottomline is Nash is what got the Suns to the #1 record in the league. They didn't even make the Playoffs last year. That's an MVP.
Jackal wrote:I didn't say his game was all power? He has a power game and other things in his arsenal.
But if you had to compare him with one of the few successfull big men today, I wouldn't do that with Duncan. I'd rather compare him to Shaq.
fgrep15 wrote:Just agree he's like Shawn Kemp and let it all end![]()
I'd say he's most similar to none really, he's really not like any of them, doesn't have as good a jumpshot or near the post skills that Duncan has, doesn't have the post up power game that Shaq has, and isn't as perimeter oriented as KG is.
He also doesn't have near the passing or rebounding skill of any of them right now, and still needs work defensively to get up to being a good defender from jsut average.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests