Signature Size

by **Ataraxia** on Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:49 pm

I vote for 450x100 , PLEASE DONT HURT ME :crazyeyes:

by **Donatello** on Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:56 pm

450-100

signed, DonatelloForPres

by **Colin** on Tue Nov 23, 2004 4:21 pm

450*100, RuffRyder's suggestion is great.

by **Nick** on Tue Nov 23, 2004 5:22 pm

colin826 wrote:450*100, RuffRyder's suggestion is great.

by **J@3** on Tue Nov 23, 2004 5:33 pm

450x100... and yeah, Ruffryders suggestion is good.

Btw, my sig is 442x113... would I have to change this or is it close enough to the sig limits?

by **Ataraxia** on Tue Nov 23, 2004 7:26 pm

yup even I got a prob cause mines 400x130 (close to that)

but I dunno I dont think my signatures is too disturbing to the public....but if we gotta stick by the absolute rules then I change my vote to 450x150 :lol:

by **truSt** on Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:50 pm

450*150

by . on Wed Nov 24, 2004 12:41 am

by . on Wed Nov 24, 2004 6:18 am

LOL @ this AZN_EDIIE dude, he has 3 pictures in his sig and they are in the following size: 560x335, 560x420 and 560x420

by **SkipToMy_Lou** on Wed Nov 24, 2004 9:59 am

LOL @ this AZN_EDIIE dude, he has 3 pictures in his sig and they are in the following size: 560x335, 560x420 and 560x420

Lmao just saw it a few minutes ago

by **Donatello** on Wed Nov 24, 2004 12:47 pm

AZN_EDIIE's signature, shrunken down so it doesn't take up so much space:

This is nuts. I have PMed him with no reply.

Bluesky · by **Andrew** on Wed Nov 24, 2004 9:47 pm

I've removed it and added a note about signature limits in its place.

by **Micchy_boy** on Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:53 am

il vote for 450x100.

i n putting avatar they wont allow us to put bigger than a cetain size (dimension or kb). can this features be used in putting signature. i mean if we put a huge sig, it will not allow us to update our profile or maybe won't show up automatcally.

i just hate to see very big sig in this forum.

by **Old Mazzlow** on Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:56 am

Donatello wrote:AZN_EDIIE's signature, shrunken down so it doesn't take up so much space:

This is nuts. I have PMed him with no reply.

haha why woudl annybody make their sig that big? *sigh* damn n00bs

i'll shrink mine down a bit too, MAYBE..... *thinks*

by **LegoTP** on Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:57 am

Yeah, why not 450*100...
I will change my sig's size then...

Bluesky · by **Andrew** on Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:16 pm

Sounds like 450x100 is the most popular choice, but the decision isn't final yet so if anyone has any further suggestions as to a better size now would be a great time to mention them.

by **Donatello** on Tue Dec 07, 2004 9:41 am

hey mazzlo...if i'm not mistaken, it's spelled "surprise"

by **J@3** on Tue Dec 07, 2004 3:35 pm

Mazzlow wrote:haha why woudl annybody make their sig that big? *sigh* damn n00bs

Oh the irony.

by **Jowe** on Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:32 pm

How come he is still allowed to have a sig about rape?

by **Stevan** on Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:29 pm

Because it annoys you.

by **Andreas Dahl** on Wed Dec 08, 2004 1:03 am

450x100 sounds good to me. (y)

I think the the rape-justification signature is rather disturbing aswell... (n)

by **Old Mazzlow** on Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:42 am

Donatello wrote:hey mazzlo...if i'm not mistaken, it's spelled "surprise"

yea it is, I didn't make it though.

Jae™ wrote:
Mazzlow wrote:haha why woudl annybody make their sig that big? *sigh* damn n00bs

Oh the irony.

Mines Not Too Big.

Jowe wrote:How come he is still allowed to have a sig about rape?

I got it taken away at Dot Org, not here.

by **Andreas Dahl** on Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:46 am

Mazzlow wrote:
Jae™ wrote:
Mazzlow wrote:haha why woudl annybody make their sig that big? *sigh* damn n00bs

Oh the irony.

Mines Not Too Big.

He wasn't refering to the size of it... :wink:

I'm not sure having that sig of yours is a very good idea man (n)

by **Old Mazzlow** on Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:51 am

*sigh*

Me in another thread wrote:ok ok. seems a lot of people here are finding my sig offencive/inappropriate. Personally, I didnt think it would raise such a uproar but i was wrong. I personally, thought the original picture was quite funny when i first saw it on "Woth 1000" but apparently, i'm one of the few people that feels this way. Call me an insencitive bastard but "my bad." I guess its back to the turtle sig?

by **Ruff Ryder** on Wed Dec 08, 2004 9:52 am

Mazzlow wrote:*sigh*
Me in another thread wrote:ok ok. seems a lot of people here are finding my sig offencive/inappropriate. Personally, I didnt think it would raise such a uproar but i was wrong. I personally, thought the original picture was quite funny when i first saw it on "Woth 1000" but apparently, i'm one of the few people that feels this way. Call me an insencitive bastard but "my bad." I guess its back to the turtle sig?

You insensitive bastard! :mrgreen:

Signature Size

Who is online