S_Brat wrote:Delly is the player of the game. Hands down. His defense and his scrappy play just propelled the cavs to victory. If he was not guarding curry all game I think curry would have caught fire.
mp3 wrote:I think the only way Lebron can win with a "big 3" is if he gets a couple of referees on board with his team.
air gordon wrote:You can say the same thing about the Cavs. They're in an inferior conference. They are on a free pass to the finals.
Noah, Gasol, and Gibson were hurt in the bulls series. Korver couldn't finish the series. Carroll and milsap were hampered by injuries
Menopauss wrote:So Curry choked hard and people are saying Dellavedova great defender.
Andrew wrote:When players put up ridiculous numbers, it's often called a "video game-like performance", which is an apt turn of phrase to describe a star that's flat out dominating and seemingly hitting all their shots...like a basketball video game on an easy difficulty setting. The way Curry and the Warriors as a whole (good stretches by Thompson aside) played in Game 2, it was like a casual basketball gamer playing really badly: "Hey, Curry's got a three-point rating of 96. I'll just run it up the floor and bomb away from three with him!".
koberulz wrote:Of course, you're going to write this off as a coincidence, while pretending that him running into the legs of two different guys was him being dirty.
Menopauss wrote:So Curry choked hard and people are saying Dellavedova great defender. Did you guys not see how easily he gets past him every time? He just had a bad night shooting the ball and that ESPN graph is just another way promoting the finals. He had a lot of help on D.
Andrew wrote:Curry settled for way too many really bad looks from beyond the arc.
mp3 wrote:Maybe I counted the Refs out too soon!
Menopauss wrote:So Curry choked hard and people are saying Dellavedova great defender. Did you guys not see how easily he gets past him every time? He just had a bad night shooting the ball and that ESPN graph is just another way promoting the finals. He had a lot of help on D.S_Brat wrote:Delly is the player of the game. Hands down. His defense and his scrappy play just propelled the cavs to victory. If he was not guarding curry all game I think curry would have caught fire.
Lol. LeBron had 39/16/11 but somehow scoring 9 points in 42 minutes and hitting two free-throws is better.
S_Brat wrote:You must be young. And dont appreciate the entirety of basketball.
I have almost no offense but am known for my scrappy play and great defense and it was always my job to guard the best player. So I know the importance of that kind of play.
Most of you young guns just want to look at points.
NovU wrote:never have I seen LBJ running so many ISO plays which also is an ugly basketball
how many times has his overuse of possession stagnated the offense. This could be the case of "let's go to our best player and see what he can do on every stretch" series.
Menopauss wrote:S_Brat wrote:You must be young. And dont appreciate the entirety of basketball.
You must be "different" and don't want to appreciate the greatest player in the world.I have almost no offense but am known for my scrappy play and great defense and it was always my job to guard the best player. So I know the importance of that kind of play.
I just laughed at this sentence. What does you presumably irrelevant career have to do with anything? There are a lot of NBA level players who don't know much about analyzing, so this argument isn't really necessary and I find it as a way of letting everyone know you played basketball. Good for you.Most of you young guns just want to look at points.
And how old exactly are you?
Since when is having a triple-double just scoring? Oh yes, everyone who think a guy who has an obviously better game because of 39/16/11 is young. What a joke.
Dellavedova had a good game. But to say it was more important than the one LeBron had, with the arguments you have is just laughable.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests