NovU wrote:I wouldn't be too surprised. You always hated the Heat on a unseen level. SauruSauru wrote:lebron going back to cleveland is the best possible thing imo. i think it makes a far better story.
Why? Better story? LoL at you young grasshopper, life isn't a fairy tale. He's going to a shit team with shitty history of building it right to contend. I'd rather have him go somewhere else for basketball sake like Houston, Mavericks, or Bulls. Fuck little story that princesses would read before bedtime.
NovU wrote:Cavs aren't that gifted unless Irving finally decides to develop his junk game positively.
NovU wrote:Rest of Cavs are piles of diarrhea potential. They already peaked or are shit prospect (Bennett is nobody, Waiter is a minus player, Thompson is average at best, Wiggins is Canadien). There is no long term.
NovU wrote:The max contract Heat can offer is Max-max and is superior than the max which the Cavs can offer unless s&t is done which is unlikely.
Only reason LBJ going back to the Cavs would be for sentimental reasons, not for winning.
NovU wrote:It's about positioning yourself in more competitive situation within reasons. You just want LBJ back in CLE just for the sake of princess story. Man up Saurucess.
Sauru wrote:NovU wrote:It's about positioning yourself in more competitive situation within reasons. You just want LBJ back in CLE just for the sake of princess story. Man up Saurucess.
sometimes i think to myself "this guy cannot be that fucking stupid" but you insist on proving me wrong. you want this guy to hop from team to team trying to win a ring when the only place he can go besides miami without taking a big fat shit all over his legacy is cleveland. if you even the slightest bit of a sports fan than you know that stories are why people watch the game. everyone wants to say "i was there when...."
_Steve_ wrote:NovU has a good point: The Heat made it to the finals for 4 consecutive years. Even if Wade is declining, the Heat, with the big 3, would be a surefire playoff team.
The Cavs on the other hand will have to deal with all kind of chemistry issues (new coach, new Players, Dion & Kyrie) next season, no matter if they are able to sign LeBron or miss on him.
NovU wrote:Sauru wrote:NovU wrote:It's about positioning yourself in more competitive situation within reasons. You just want LBJ back in CLE just for the sake of princess story. Man up Saurucess.
sometimes i think to myself "this guy cannot be that fucking stupid" but you insist on proving me wrong. you want this guy to hop from team to team trying to win a ring when the only place he can go besides miami without taking a big fat shit all over his legacy is cleveland. if you even the slightest bit of a sports fan than you know that stories are why people watch the game. everyone wants to say "i was there when...."
Except that some fans find your story stupid and boring. I made myself clear that I am basketball first princess story second guy.
Find me fucking stupid, I find you cute.
mandich wrote:YOU are being the hater now bashing on Cleveland. And to say that Miami with a washed-up Wade and Bosh-spice is better that loads of talent and possibility in Cleveland is irrational.
Sauru wrote:you are not a basketball guy though not even close. you are nothing more than a front runner.
That's YOU being deluded, again. I simply don't see why I should like CLE so much when no evidence supports so.
Now, somebody please tell me where exactly I could find those loads of talent and possibility from the Cavs?
Waiters? Gee? Thompson? Varejao? Bennett? Wiggins?
Sure the Cavs could make some moves but room for error is much stricter that other teams.
LBJ would entirely have to depend on making them better on lone effort and hope for the young talents to develop in a positive direction.
That said, I am not going to criticize LBJ's decision
But it's clear he's going to a less competitive team with shit history/record
and where there's much work cut out to do roster wise.
mandich wrote:My point is wherever LeBron goes, he's going to be in a position to win something, but as of right now, the Cavs look much better.
Why are you doing this again? J
Your use of quote is just awful as they serve no real purpose.
mandich wrote:My point is wherever LeBron goes, he's going to be in a position to win something, but as of right now, the Cavs look much better.
So... the post above contains your back up on why it is so? Then I disagree as it is weak and baseless and stupid. I will leave it at that.
mandich wrote:You have a point guard that is a proven shooter, ball-handler and scorer who can take some offensive load off of LeBron.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests