
iDiot wrote:i don't really think we need anymore mods in here... we already have qweet, dahl, and james etc ... they all have the ability to lock posts etc (i think...) ... and they just don't because maybe there wasn't any real need to.... the flaming in general talks is sometimes really not that big a deal... hell, people even become friends after a good flame...
we already have qweet, dahl, and james etc ... they all have the ability to lock posts etc (i think...) .
BIG GREEN wrote:gamewiz wrote:BIG GREEN wrote:Why do you want to be a moderator?
I'm all about bringing this community together man. There seems to be a need for moderation that is just, fair, and all that good stuff. And as a fellow NBA Liver, and gamer and overall sports nut I feel I am that person. I also relate very well to people, thus I would make an excellent choice.![]()
To be honest..everyone says that...saying it wont cut it. Lead by example and be a model member of the forum.
If I could help in any way, be it moderating or not, contact me Andrew.
Stevan wrote:I don't have any objections, but I don't generally have problems with anyone either.
My only suggestion would be to simplify things:
1)Everybody should respect everybody (mods included).
2)No unnecessary flamming.
3)Don't post links to Porn and illegal shit.
4)Keep spam in the general section.
5)Post in the right section.
6)Have fun.
There ya go!
to tell the truth I couldn't be bothered reading all those rules and it all seemed the same as before.. so I just voted no..
David wrote:no.. like I said.. they seem the same as before.. there may be minor changes.. but I didn't like the rules before and nothing has really changed.. so why shouldn't I vote no?
David wrote:no.. like I said.. they seem the same as before.. there may be minor changes.. but I didn't like the rules before and nothing has really changed.. so why shouldn't I vote no?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests