crawford4MIP4real wrote:perhaps i'm the only one who thinks that this signing was more bad then good...
as mentioned above, the suns are paying an awful lot and for a long time for the "older" nash.
nash isn't much of pure PG himself, is pretty poor on the defensive end, and has a history of breaking down in the 2nd half of the season.
was it such a wise move to spend all that money on a pg when you already have 2 developing pgs (barbosa & vujanic) and a wing player who can handle (johnson)?
phoenix does have a bad history bad signings- googs, p hardaway, etc
Nash isn't a pure PG??!!? Nash is the purest point guard in the league today, maybe more so than Kidd because he beats people with his quickness and speed.
I have injury concerns with Nash as well, but he hasn't broken down for the last 3 years. He played 82 games in both 2001 and 2002 and 78 in 2003. Yes, IMO it's wise to spend $13 million a year on Nash because he'll help this team so much on offense. He's a fast break guy and a pure point guard who distributes. Barbosa likes to score more than Nash and with guys like JJ, Marion, and Amare, you should be spreading the ball around. Vujanic can play some 2. In fact, that's what he plays in Europe right now, iirc, and probably what he's better at. Last time I checked, he was averaging 3.8 apg, but I could be mistaken. Neither he nor Barbosa are proven commodities like Nash is in the league. Yes, Barbosa showed lots of promise (and I loved having him on my fantasy team) last year, but he's only 22 and has many years ahead of him. He needs a lot of development off the court as well, and Nash can be a good mentor for him.