News- Carlisle- "Changes WILL be made to Pacers roster&

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

News- Carlisle- "Changes WILL be made to Pacers roster&

Postby Mazzocchi on Sun Jun 06, 2004 6:50 am

June 5, 2004
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- After a disappointing loss to the more experienced Detroit Pistons in the Eastern Conference finals, Indiana Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said he expects some changes to be made.

"Right now, I don't think this team will be back in its exact form next year,'' Carlisle said Thursday. "There will be some changes, either through free agency and the draft or the possibility of trades. There's going to be some things that are going to be different.''

Exactly who stays and who goes remains to be seen.

The biggest speculation centers on forward Al Harrington, who had a breakout season as the Pacers' top reserve and sometimes starter. Harrington, though, has expressed a strong interest in being a regular starter and may be reluctant to accept a similar role next season.

Carlisle said he may be consulted in that and other personnel decisions, but ultimately it's up to team president Larry Bird and CEO Donnie Walsh.

"If there is the opportunity for him to be a starter here, that would be great,'' Carlisle said of Harrington. "And if there isn't, then it may be time for him to move on to another team. Those are decisions that are going to be made by Larry and Donnie.''

Bird and Walsh met with players individually on Wednesday to discuss their situations with the team.

After Tuesday's loss in Game 6 of the Eastern Conference finals, Bird said he and Walsh would take some time to evaluate the team before making any moves via trade or free agency.

Harrington's youth, affordable contract and considerable talent make him an attractive commodity that could yield the outside shooter or big man the Pacers covet. Moving him also would help alleviate a surplus of small forwards -- including Harrington, Ron Artest and Jonathan Bender -- on the roster.

"This has been kind of an unbalanced roster,'' Carlisle said. "There's a glut of guys at the small forward spot and there haven't been a lot of minutes.''

Backup point guard Kenny Anderson is expected to head elsewhere for more playing time and Carlisle said he wants Jamison Brewer, the team's only other free agent, to return.

Jermaine O'Neal, who will skip the Olympics in Athens to allow a slightly torn ligament in his left knee to heal, said after the loss to Detroit that he expected some changes.

"It's a strange world in professional sports,'' O'Neal said. "Teams make changes. I've learned to handle what I can handle and that's just basketball. I'm going to let Larry and Donnie and our owners handle the movement part.''

The first opportunity for the Pacers to add to the team comes on June 24, when they will have the 29th pick in the draft.

In addition to any roster changes, Carlisle also views this summer as important for the team to continue the momentum of a successful season that included a franchise-record 61 wins.

At a news conference Thursday, it was clear that Carlisle has a sense of urgency heading into his first summer with the Pacers.

"We're going to be very proactive with really attacking this summer to get ourselves as ready as we possibly can for next October,'' Carlisle said. "That's where our next opportunity begins, officially.''

But if you ask Carlisle, preparation for redeeming themselves and making the next step to the NBA Finals has already begun.

"The work started yesterday,'' Carlisle said. "It's going to be a busy summer.''
(my 2nd news story :)) If its old news... "my bad"
(and its nto BIG news, but still its news)
User avatar
Mazzocchi
Resident Mavericks Fan (Since 1994)
 
Posts: 3132
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 6:00 am
Location: The Darkside Of The Moon

Postby Andrew on Sun Jun 06, 2004 1:03 pm

A few changes wouldn't hurt the Pacers, but I think they should be wary of too much tinkering and movement as far as their key players are concerned.

Take the 1996 Supersonics for example. They won 64 games, made the NBA Finals and took two games from the 1996 Bulls. Even though they kept most of their team intact, they made some moves that ultimately prevented the Franchise from advancing past the second round every year since. They didn't need to pay Jim McIlvaine that much money, and they certainly didn't need him as a starter when they had Sam Perkins.

The Pacers should also be wary of the temptation to stock up on talent. The Blazers added a lot of talent after losing to the Lakers in the 2000 playoffs, and haven't been out of the first round since; in fact, until last year's seven game series with the Mavericks, they hadn't won a playoff game since Game 7 of the 2000 Western Conference Finals. The Kings and Mavericks are recent examples of great teams on paper that ultimately lost to teams that could simply play better together.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115082
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Full Surface on Sun Jun 06, 2004 1:51 pm

All the Pacers need are role bench players. None of them was able to step up when O'Neal and Tinsley couldn't perform.
User avatar
Full Surface
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 8:25 am
Location: USA

Postby FanOfAll on Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:25 pm

I think the Pacers will try to get more veteran 3/4/5's instead of relying on young 'uns like Big Al, Bender, Croshere (sort of), and Foster. I wouldn't be surprised if Big Al is traded because as stated, he wants more minutes and $$, plus I don't think the Pacers were pleased with the way he played in the 2nd halves of the Ind-Det series.

You could see another 2 guard brought in...they liked James Jones a lot but Freddie Jones won the spot on the active roster over him.
FanOfAll
 
Posts: 930
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 11:44 am

Postby LouisvilleLip on Sun Jun 06, 2004 5:02 pm

Pacers just need a sg and they will be fine. I also dont see the point in breakin up such a successful, young team which i doubt Bird would do. But i do see them tradin Harrington, Pollard/Chroshere to get a new quality starting sg.
Image
User avatar
LouisvilleLip
 
Posts: 244
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 7:15 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby Full Surface on Sun Jun 06, 2004 11:37 pm

Reggie Miller only has 1 or 2 years left in him. Harrington is still young, has potential, and the Pacers might need him in the future.
User avatar
Full Surface
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 8:25 am
Location: USA

Postby matmat8 on Mon Jun 07, 2004 12:49 am

refuze wrote:Reggie Miller only has 1 or 2 years left in him. Harrington is still young, has potential, and the Pacers might need him in the future.


True but if they want a good sg they will have to trade him and harrington as it was said probably wants more minutes and especially more money :P with the season he has done.
They need a better backcourt because tinsley is unconsistent (is that how you spell it?) and reggie is old.
They already have artest and o'neal+foster (good role player) so they could trade harrington and keep reggie as the 6th man.
matmat8
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:11 pm
Location: france

Postby Amphatoast on Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:45 am

trading reggie isn't a option.
#1 nobody really wants him
#2 just for the loyalty they can't trade him....that's like saying the bulls trading Jordan when he is 40...just can't do it
Amphatoast
 
Posts: 3004
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:45 am
Location: new york

Postby Jackal on Mon Jun 07, 2004 4:36 am

That's why he didnt say anything about trading Miller, he said they could trade Harrington & keep Miller as the sixth man.

Oh, if you were just saying that they cant trade Miller, not related to what the person before you had to say, thanks for stating the obvious.
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby FanOfAll on Tue Jun 08, 2004 3:44 pm

LouisvilleLip wrote:Pacers just need a sg and they will be fine. I also dont see the point in breakin up such a successful, young team which i doubt Bird would do. But i do see them tradin Harrington, Pollard/Chroshere to get a new quality starting sg.

You first say Bird/Walsh won't break up a young team, then you say they might trade Harrington or Croshere? Harrington and Croshere are a huge part of this young team.

The reason they might trade Harrington is that he wants starter minutes and starter money. They can't give him that. Croshere is harder to trade because of the big contract he got after playing well in the Finals vs the Lakers a few years ago. Also, Bird likes him a lot.
FanOfAll
 
Posts: 930
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 11:44 am

Postby Matt on Tue Jun 08, 2004 3:54 pm

If Pacers want to advance they need Reggie Miller to retire.....or just bench him.
Image
User avatar
Matt
 
Posts: 7236
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:48 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Andrew on Tue Jun 08, 2004 7:59 pm

Reggie's contract expires in 2006 (for some reason I thought it expired this year or the next). Trading him would be difficult (and a slap in the face), and I'm not sure if he's willing to retire before his contract is up; I haven't read anything that suggests that.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115082
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia


Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests