Curry could be used as bait to better Bulls.

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Curry could be used as bait to better Bulls.

Postby Jackal on Sat May 29, 2004 5:39 am

LOS ANGELES -- I'm becoming worried. I'm seeing a significant similarity between Bulls general managers John Paxson and Jerry Krause. They both seem to think they know more about the NBA than the media. I waited all day and not a single call asking me what to do with the Bulls' No. 3 pick in the NBA draft.

So here it is: No. 3, Eddy Curry and some of those bad contracts like Scottie Pippen's or Eddie Robinson's to Memphis for Pau Gasol and Shane Battier. Maybe No. 3, a real bad contract like Jerome Williams' or Antonio Davis' and Curry to Seattle for Ray Allen and Seattle's lottery pick, No. 12.

The Grizzlies and Supersonics are said to have contacted the Bulls about Curry, who remains the only real bait the Bulls have. There's little or no interest in Jamal Crawford or Tyson Chandler.


A peek at the standings explains it. There are four teams in the West who need a low post center: Memphis, Seattle, Dallas and Golden State.

Curry could be the answer for any of them, though he's a question mark for the Bulls.

He clearly regressed last season for whatever reason: The coaching change, playing at home, the pressure to produce, the expectations, the many candy factories.

The belief around the NBA is Curry still can develop but won't in Chicago. It's why Memphis probably would consider including Gasol, who is said to be available despite his team's 50-win season. They have Stromile Swift, they're not convinced Gasol is tough enough for the Western Conference and general manager Jerry West, currently without a pick, supposedly would love to get into the draft. It's probably the best package the Bulls could get. Allen, at his age and salary, is a big risk.

A front line of Gasol, Chandler and Battier would give the Bulls an exciting look, it would add flexibility and it would be big enough to compete in the Eastern Conference. Next season, not in a few years.

The question is whether this is Year 2 of the John Paxson/Scott Skiles era or Year 7 of losing.

The Bulls probably could get Antawn Jamison from Dallas or Mike Dunleavy from Golden State. But that's not enough for Curry, even with the Warriors throwing in their No. 11 draft pick. If you want Dunleavy, you may as well take Luol Deng.

That's who NBA and Duke insiders say is a virtual lock for the Bulls. Deng has told associates his first choice is the Bulls, and that he will limit workouts.

So who is this guy?

One NBA personnel man likened Deng to former Celtic Cedric Maxwell. Another said he's a step above Battier. Like Battier, Deng had his greatest success at Duke when it switched its lineup to play him at power forward.

Deng will have to adjust to play small forward in the pros. He is just 19 and is not nearly as NBA ready as Kirk Hinrich or Carmelo Anthony. But he will be a good player.

The report on Deng, compiled from several NBA scouts who watched him all season, describes him as a crafty player, not particularly athletic, with long arms, a hard worker with a good shot, a good feel for the game and a first-class individual. Deng sounds like the profile of the kind of player the Bulls desire. The downside is he's not much of a jumper and isn't quick, so he could struggle with athletic players at small forward, which he'll have to guard. He has long legs and in college he tended to play erect on defense so quicker forwards often could exploit him.

He has good hands and shoots a variety of shots as sort of a 6-foot-8-inch throwback who plays closer to the ground. It translates into excellence if not stardom.

One issue that will be interesting to watch is his heritage. He's from the Sudan and active politically. Some believe he is being pushed to go to the NBA to gain a higher profile and funds for the causes in his home country. Manute Bol was involved in many and suffered large financial setbacks.

Paxson tends to be conservative so the belief around the NBA is he will select Deng as another good piece and stop there. The Bulls are probably safe if some team surprises them and moves up to get Deng, like Miami did last season when they selected Dwyane Wade. Emeka Okafor figures to be the No. 1 pick and several teams, most notably Atlanta, want to trade up for Georgia high school star Dwight Howard, which would give the Bulls leverage to add picks or players.

The Bulls should come out of this draft better than last year. How much better will be determined by how creative and daring they can be.


Whole article since you need to be member, link too.

Curry as bait betters Bulls.


I swear, I swear if Curry is traded he will turn into a good player. He will have consitant number and all, it's just the Bulls' luck. :x Or their GM.
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby RedTorro on Sat May 29, 2004 5:55 am

"A front line of Gasol, Chandler and Battier would give the Bulls an exciting look"

That would be a disgrace of a front line. Paxson needs to show some balls and start treating his young talent like they are worth more than a couple of underachieving good but not great players. Chicago has now turned into the leagues farm system and it needs to stop! If there aren't any legit superstars such as T-mac willing to come to Chicago then theres no need to trade away our young guys. Aren't letting go the likes of Brand,Miller and Artest enough? Now you want to let Curry go?.. He's the only legit center left in the East outside of Z. :evil: The East is filled with power forwards playing center.
User avatar
RedTorro
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:02 am
Location: Moreno Valley, CA

Postby KillaCam1100 on Sat May 29, 2004 6:02 am

I was gonna read, but it was to long.......
KillaCam1100
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:07 am
Location: East Coast

Postby Jackal on Sat May 29, 2004 6:04 am

Then don't post. :roll:
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby KillaCam1100 on Sat May 29, 2004 6:12 am

Psycho Jackal wrote:Then don't post. :roll:


My bad yo, i didn't mean to be rude.
KillaCam1100
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:07 am
Location: East Coast

Postby Andrew on Sat May 29, 2004 2:40 pm

I'd be inclined to keep Curry, even if he's the only players other teams are interested in. Just because he's the only player attracting interest from other teams, it doesn't mean he should be traded, risking another Jermaine O'Neal/Portland scenario. I'm not too keen on any of the scenarios suggested in the article.

The Article wrote:Allen, at his age and salary, is a big risk.


He's still only 28 (29 in a couple of months). He's not one of the youngest players in the league anymore, but he's in his prime, and health permitting, will probably be around for another five or six years. I'm not saying the Bulls should trade for him, but I don't agree with players being written off as being over the hill at the age of 27, 28.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115082
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby jwin on Sat May 29, 2004 2:50 pm

i agree the bulls need to wait till it's clear that a player isn't going to be as productive as they want before trying to get something else for him. they seem to be hoping that a mj double is going to come shining through for them and they can then start adding role players around him. if they had kept some of those that they had in recent years they would be at least a consistent team that's maybe a player or two away from contending.
jwin
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:17 pm

Postby matmat8 on Sat May 29, 2004 8:20 pm

If they cant develop curry theirselves they may as well trade him to get a player who has confirmed something.
A lot of players have been through chicago and haven't done well and then left and are doing good or even better.
The problem is the staff to me.
matmat8
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:11 pm
Location: france

Postby Jackal on Sun May 30, 2004 3:29 am

Well, there is another article that came out today saying Krause might re-think trading Curry, Curry went upto Krause and told him he will work his ass off during training camp. He said he will work his ass off during all 82 games.

Krause says his trading all depends on how much he will work, if he can prove he will work, Krause is willing to keep him.

Some rumours circulating are that the Bulls are willing to trade Jerome Williams + Pick to the Utah Jazz for Matt Harpring + Pick.

If anyone is really interested in the link, I'll look it up if I'm asked nicely. :P
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby -BHZMAFIA- on Sun May 30, 2004 8:54 am

in some ways, i would love for the grizzlies to that trade and sometime i wouldnt want them to. i look at the no.3 pick and say we can draft DENG!then we would have curry. plus that deal gives us cap space. we could probably sign a star-caliber player because we coudl get some caproom. Gasol was also talkin about getting 90 mil next year on his contract. :shock: the only thing i dont like about the deal is that we are giving up battier. alot of you may think battier doesnt mean nothin to the team because he only averaged around 7 or 8 ppg. if u watch the grizz games like i do u would know how valuable battier is. he hit like 4 game winning shots for us last season. he is basically our go-2-guy in crunchtime if we need a big basket. he is a hustle player and thats the only reason i wouldnt want to do that deal. if we could get deng then i dont think i would miss battier as much.

Grizz possible lineup:
C- Curry
PF-Swift
SF-Deng
SG-Posey
PG-Jwill

With Miller, Wright, Watson all on the bench. Just have to wait for the expansion draft. :roll:
Image
User avatar
-BHZMAFIA-
 
Posts: 4608
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 9:49 am
Location: Memphis

Postby RedTorro on Sun May 30, 2004 9:56 am

:roll: Since when did it become the Bulls job to improve other teams. Also, I thought that fat fuck Jerry was out of chi town. We don't need him destroying our franchise anymore.
User avatar
RedTorro
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:02 am
Location: Moreno Valley, CA

Postby Fresh8 on Sun May 30, 2004 12:48 pm

No way- The Bulls should keep the third pick... cause I'm a bit superstitious- maybe history will repeat itself!

If you you know what I mean!
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Postby Full Surface on Mon May 31, 2004 12:15 am

Dwight Howard and Emeka Okafor will be gone by the 3rd selection.
User avatar
Full Surface
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 8:25 am
Location: USA

Postby hmm on Mon May 31, 2004 12:27 am

.
hmm
 
Posts: 2058
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 2:06 am


Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests