Lakers vs Spurs

by **Jackal** on Fri May 14, 2004 11:50 pm

I'll be back to gloat later.

YAY! :lol:

by **Boyk** on Sat May 15, 2004 1:06 am

WOW!

What an awesome game!!
I mean first Kobe hits a good shot, then Duncan pulls some shit from nowhere, then Fisher pulls an even bigger shot out of his ass.

I thought Fisher and Geroge were the keys to this victory, George finally hit some shots, Fisher played some good D, aoh and that shot

The only problem was, Shaquille didnt get the ball enough, and when he did get it, he passed it off.
Kobe shot badly in the end, but i didnt think he really forced any of his shots, most of the bad ones were when the shotclock was goin down, he more got his shots from plays made for him or through the offence.

anyway, in game 6, the Lakers have to goto Shaq and Kobe, prolly feed it into Shaq a little bit more, then this series is over

by **airtsinelas** on Sat May 15, 2004 1:09 am

Your countless nah nah nah nah singing are the shit your talking so be careful, the mods are very tight in moderating the forums around here, no offense.

Anyway, really a great game although I did not watch the game I was shocked that the Lakers were able to pull it off with .4 ticks to go. (I was following the Yahoo Gamechannel)

The Spurs are filing for a protest but its really unlikely that the outcome to be overturn. Now the odds are on the Lakers not only to win this series but to win it all.

It looks like two years in row, Game 5 for Horry was another horrible experience.

Fish Game winner in slow mo

http://www.spursreport.com/MVI_0808.avi

by **Steve04** on Sat May 15, 2004 1:57 am

Wow, best game I've seen since MJ's gamewinner against Utah to win the finals in '98.

by **Damien War** on Sat May 15, 2004 3:01 am

Sup Fellas? Yeah wins like this bring everybody from under a rock. But did anybody other than me pay attention to how Karl Malone almost lost this game for us in the fourth? Rushed his shots in obvious fear, bobbled three rebounds, can't forget that pass to no one in particular, then stagnated the offense with his uncertainty late in the quarter when the the Spurs rallied. No wonder he ain't won a ring.

Thank God Fisher salvaged it for us...SHIT. He played big all game on defense which is something I hadn't seen him do in the playoffs since 02 when Bibby took his manhood. D-Fish's is a confidence player and with a game like this under his belt I expect an unbelievable game from the boy when we get back to the city. Atleast 4 3pt Fg made....

I'm still more happy for Kobe. I hear he was put to two IVs after he past out from exhaustion in the training room. He was still huge in the first half and even though his shot was affected in the second he made the most important ones. It wouldn't have been right if it were all for nothing.

by **Micchy_boy** on Sat May 15, 2004 3:46 am

jonas wrote:Your countless nah nah nah nah singing are the shit your talking so be careful, the mods are very tight in moderating the forums around here, no offense.

what im trying to ask is "anong mali sa grammar ko". what proper grammar?

i stop singing it just my new signature!!!! :lol:

by **Pointgod5** on Sat May 15, 2004 4:29 am

OMG that was amazing game winner by fish :shock:

Tim hit almost a game winner!
Fucking Fisher :twisted:

by **The Game** on Sat May 15, 2004 5:33 am

by watching that game, i just remembered why i really love this game....

by **Amphatoast** on Sat May 15, 2004 6:37 am

k08e4mvp wrote:I have seen alot of wining lately on different Spurs forums, about the gameclock starting to late when Fisher got the ball in his hands, for everyone who agrees with them:

the clock doesn't stop till the ball touches the floor i think. I've seen this always happen late in games. This is properly one of the few faults in the NBA, the shotclock situation in the final minutes.

by **Drex** on Sat May 15, 2004 6:58 am

Holy shit, man...unbelievable shot by Fisher :shock:

. First, Duncan with that crazy shot over Shaq (he went for his rebound), then, Kobe wide open for the J, Duncan with another great shot over Shaq, and... :shock:

D-Fish with that awesome shot...damn, not a good game, but you couldn't stop watching the last qtr.

they are undefeated @sbc against the lakers in the playoffs.
There's a first for everything.

by **Micchy_boy** on Sat May 15, 2004 12:30 pm

this year playoff are battle of SHOT!!! nw its chauncey's turn. 2.3 sec at halfcourt pistons trailed by three but sanked desperatin shot (with help of nets poor defense and missing 3 of 4 free throw). i hope in wolves-kings we see another one of THE SHOT!!!

by the way its start of second overtime!!!

by **Matt** on Sat May 15, 2004 12:57 pm

OT #3 now....lol, Jefferson vs Ham on tipoff

if all this fouling continues we might see Darko!

by **Amphatoast** on Sat May 15, 2004 1:15 pm

stack42 wrote:OT #3 now....lol, Jefferson vs Ham on tipoff

if all this fouling continues we might see Darko!

lol i wish that happened. Darko comes in and start making buckets and show he isn't a bust lol

Bluesky · by **Andrew** on Sat May 15, 2004 3:03 pm

Amphatoast wrote:
k08e4mvp wrote:I have seen alot of wining lately on different Spurs forums, about the gameclock starting to late when Fisher got the ball in his hands, for everyone who agrees with them:

the clock doesn't stop till the ball touches the floor i think. I've seen this always happen late in games. This is properly one of the few faults in the NBA, the shotclock situation in the final minutes.

I thought the clock started as soon as the ball touched a player's hands?

by **wangster** on Sat May 15, 2004 3:25 pm

Andrew wrote:
Amphatoast wrote:
k08e4mvp wrote:I have seen alot of wining lately on different Spurs forums, about the gameclock starting to late when Fisher got the ball in his hands, for everyone who agrees with them:

the clock doesn't stop till the ball touches the floor i think. I've seen this always happen late in games. This is properly one of the few faults in the NBA, the shotclock situation in the final minutes.

I thought the clock started as soon as the ball touched a player's hands?

I think he's talking about the Duncan shot that put the Spurs up by 1 with 0.4 to go. He means that after a made basket, the clock stops when the ball hits the floor. Not when the ball first goes through the basket. Although, I must say I never knew that bit of information. Interesting.

Bluesky · by **Andrew** on Sat May 15, 2004 3:42 pm

Oh, OK. I didn't know that - I assumed it stopped as soon as the basket was good.

by . on Sat May 15, 2004 11:21 pm

Actually, the clock should stop whenever it goes trough the rim, not the net or the floor

by **Hotshot** on Sun May 16, 2004 2:58 am

wangster wrote:
Andrew wrote:
Amphatoast wrote:
k08e4mvp wrote:I have seen alot of wining lately on different Spurs forums, about the gameclock starting to late when Fisher got the ball in his hands, for everyone who agrees with them:

the clock doesn't stop till the ball touches the floor i think. I've seen this always happen late in games. This is properly one of the few faults in the NBA, the shotclock situation in the final minutes.

I thought the clock started as soon as the ball touched a player's hands?

I think he's talking about the Duncan shot that put the Spurs up by 1 with 0.4 to go. He means that after a made basket, the clock stops when the ball hits the floor. Not when the ball first goes through the basket. Although, I must say I never knew that bit of information. Interesting.

so if a player catches the ball before it touches the floor, wouldn't that mean that the shotclock never stops? :!:

by **Amphatoast** on Sun May 16, 2004 4:18 am

player is touching the floor so in a sense, that would stop the clock since the new floor is the player ( hope it made a little sense lol)

Actually, the clock should stop whenever it goes trough the rim, not the net or the floor

what if it goes through and comesback out

by **Jeffx** on Sun May 16, 2004 11:39 am

Back-to-back lucky shots - dayum! If LA goes on to win the title, Fisher will go down in history as the player who saved the Lakers 2003-04 season.

by **Fresh8** on Sun May 16, 2004 12:32 pm

Why were the Spurs doubleteaming Kobe Bryant 35 feet from the hoop? Why wasnt Bruce BOwen on the floor? Why didnt the Spurs just defend the inbounds?

by **VCarter15ffl** on Sun May 16, 2004 1:01 pm

Sit wrote:Why were the Spurs doubleteaming Kobe Bryant 35 feet from the hoop? Why wasnt Bruce BOwen on the floor? Why didnt the Spurs just defend the inbounds?

They didnt defend the inbounds because there wasnt enough time on the clock for them to pass it back. Also, that extra person was use to double team Kobe and the commentators said the Spurs didnt want Kobe to do what he did to Portland awhile ago.

by **Matt** on Sun May 16, 2004 2:18 pm

SAS did everything right. It's not like they gave up an open J to Fisher. Ginobili was right up on that. Any closer and he could have fouled, he played good D, Fisher just happened to make an impossible shot. This won't happen again

by **Alcoholic** on Sun May 16, 2004 2:19 pm

I'm listening to Game 6 on the radio right now... the refs sound like they are just clueless... handing techs wherever they want.

They said Kevin Willis pushed down on Kobe's knee to get up and thats when GP went off.

by **Amphatoast** on Sun May 16, 2004 3:38 pm

well lakers won

guess malone and payton can still get their rings

Lakers vs Spurs

Who is online