2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

How will this series go down?

Mavericks in 4
1
3%
Mavericks in 5
3
8%
Mavericks in 6
15
38%
Mavericks in 7
6
15%
Thunder in 4
1
3%
Thunder in 5
1
3%
Thunder in 6
4
10%
Thunder in 7
3
8%
Vancouver in 6
1
3%
I'm so fucking done with the NBA
0
No votes
Take dat wit chu!
0
No votes
Clay Bennett is (still) a fucking cunt
0
No votes
Mavericks should retire Tractor Traylor's jersey
3
8%
Not gonna watch this series for one reason: No Churles!
1
3%
 
Total votes : 39

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby Drex on Sun May 22, 2011 1:21 pm

I get the feeling that OKC might even tie the game, but in the end they'll fall short of completing the comeback. Specially with Dallas' shooters, a 3 in the right moment could be devastating.
Image
User avatar
Drex
You bastards!!!
 
Posts: 6074
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 10:48 am
Location: Iquique, Chile

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby deihatein on Sun May 22, 2011 1:29 pm

Come on, get it going
shadowgrin wrote:Quick question: who is better in basketball, a black dude or a pinoy dude. If you thought or considered for a moment that it's the black dude then you're also a little bit racist.

End of any racist discussion.


Pinoy > Dallas Mavericks
User avatar
deihatein
Like he never left!
 
Posts: 3879
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:13 pm
Location: Pilipphines

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby hova- on Sun May 22, 2011 1:30 pm

Dirk is really playing poorly tonight, I also like the defense on him & he does not understand to draw fouls and pass the ball.

Still, as I am the number one fanboy - call me IsuckDirk41sballs - he has hit some important shots - especially that three in the third.

As a team the Mavs started off hot, now it's and 9 point game but pretty open. Let's go Mavs ...
User avatar
hova-
Two time Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 5160
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:33 am
Location: Augsburg, Germany

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby Drex on Sun May 22, 2011 1:33 pm

Collison is playing great D on Dirk.
Image
User avatar
Drex
You bastards!!!
 
Posts: 6074
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 10:48 am
Location: Iquique, Chile

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby hova- on Sun May 22, 2011 1:36 pm

Definitely, but I also feel like Dirk is trying to do too much and his decision making just has not been great tonight. When you hit 1-6 from down town, it's usually because you're taking bad shots. Same goes for Durant on the other end.
User avatar
hova-
Two time Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 5160
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:33 am
Location: Augsburg, Germany

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby Mavs4Life on Sun May 22, 2011 1:37 pm

OKC has taken some dumb 3s. There's still time, but it looks like the Mavs may take it.
User avatar
Mavs4Life
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 1:18 pm

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby Drex on Sun May 22, 2011 1:40 pm

Horrible execution by OKC, man :doh: Why shoot so many 3's when they've been scoring at the rim and stopping Dallas.
Image
User avatar
Drex
You bastards!!!
 
Posts: 6074
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 10:48 am
Location: Iquique, Chile

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby Mavs4Life on Sun May 22, 2011 1:43 pm

Drex wrote:Horrible execution by OKC, man :doh: Why shoot so many 3's when they've been scoring at the rim and stopping Dallas.


Exactly. You don't just pull up from behind the arc escpecially with the horrible release. Drive to the rim & try to get some and 1's.
User avatar
Mavs4Life
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 1:18 pm

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby deihatein on Sun May 22, 2011 1:46 pm

It's seems Dirk jumper sealed it.
shadowgrin wrote:Quick question: who is better in basketball, a black dude or a pinoy dude. If you thought or considered for a moment that it's the black dude then you're also a little bit racist.

End of any racist discussion.


Pinoy > Dallas Mavericks
User avatar
deihatein
Like he never left!
 
Posts: 3879
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:13 pm
Location: Pilipphines

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby jonthefon on Sun May 22, 2011 1:47 pm

I'm glad OKC was stupid and didn't realise getting to the free throw line was the best way to score.
Image
User avatar
jonthefon
Fucking pissed off.
 
Posts: 1598
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:16 pm

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby atlwarrior on Sun May 22, 2011 1:50 pm

One of the worst shooting performances I have seen in a while by OKC. They shot so bad, it eventually rubbed off on the Mavericks.
User avatar
atlwarrior
 
Posts: 1326
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:04 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby Phil89 on Sun May 22, 2011 1:56 pm

Westbrook got them back into it and then killed their momentum with that missed three. Then Dirk kept making shots.
My Stories
LIVE 10 - Thunder I, Thunder II
2K13 - Wizards / 2K15 - Sixers / 2K16 - Sixers / 2K17 - Suns / 2K19 - Thunder
User avatar
Phil89
 
Posts: 6147
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Australia

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby benji on Sun May 22, 2011 2:07 pm

Dirk can't even get 20 points against a team that was in the lottery two years ago. LMFAO.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby jonthefon on Sun May 22, 2011 2:16 pm

Damn it benji I expected more out of you.
Image
User avatar
jonthefon
Fucking pissed off.
 
Posts: 1598
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:16 pm

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby benji on Sun May 22, 2011 2:37 pm

That's what everyone says about Dirk after every playoff choke job.

Nobody says it about Kobe Bryant.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby The X on Sun May 22, 2011 3:07 pm

jonthefon wrote:James Harden is a fucking cocksucking little bitch. Way to outflop JJ Barea you stupid asstwat.

No worse than Barea's flop against Andrew Bynum :P
User avatar
The X
is
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11499
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby Mavs4Life on Sun May 22, 2011 3:12 pm

Kobe choked in Game 1 of the semis. And as we said before, the Thunder have improved exceptionally. A win's a win.
User avatar
Mavs4Life
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 1:18 pm

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby benji on Sun May 22, 2011 3:51 pm

Nobody's perfect. Get the sand out of your vagina and stop obsessing over the only person to come close in an attempt to distract from the lack of rings on Dirk's finger.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby Andrew on Sun May 22, 2011 10:30 pm

Thunder had a shot but they got greedy with a couple of bad three point attempts by Westbrook and Harden on consecutive trips down the floor and it cost them. Glad they were able to make a decent run though and keep things interesting in the fourth.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115169
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby deihatein on Sun May 22, 2011 10:45 pm

phpBB [video]
shadowgrin wrote:Quick question: who is better in basketball, a black dude or a pinoy dude. If you thought or considered for a moment that it's the black dude then you're also a little bit racist.

End of any racist discussion.


Pinoy > Dallas Mavericks
User avatar
deihatein
Like he never left!
 
Posts: 3879
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:13 pm
Location: Pilipphines

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby benji on Sun May 22, 2011 10:59 pm

Almost as bad as:
phpBB [video]


Actually, what's worst is Mark Jackson's response to the Harden flop:
It is in act, but hold your horses. We're talking about fining guys 10 to 15 thousand? The bottom line is he's trying to make a play
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby Andrew on Sun May 22, 2011 11:27 pm

Awesome. ESPN's finest.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115169
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby benji on Mon May 23, 2011 12:00 am

The playoffs really emphasize this when you go back and forth from TNT to ESPN/ABC for every game. ESPN's coverage is simply atrocious.

It's obviously cliche to bring up Ernie, Chuck and Kenny but it's still hilarious to watch ESPN spend the last decade desperately attempting to recreate it on all their shows despite the fact no one they hire has the mentality to be like Chuck and Kenny (except Tom Tolbert who they fired for being too willing to talk about his opinion) let alone able to manage two dominant personalities like Ernie does. To the point that they had plenty of footage from TNT that Magic is one of the worst commentators of all time, (Chris Webber on the other hand came out of nowhere to fit in perfectly with Chuck which TNT realized after he had a small trial run back in the day) yet they not only hired him but forced him into the already wasteland of a pre/half/post-game show they have. And they always work in some complete moron like Michael Wilbon and Steven A. Smith who have already spent years on the same network proving they're functionally retarded. (I mean is Tony Kornheiser, of all people, dominating you every single day of your life not enough to convince Wilbon to kill himself?) Meanwhile they refuse to try and use any of their NBA writers regularly, all of whom while also terrible at discussing basketball can at least form arguments and coherent sentences. And it's not like they don't have TV/radio experience, yet because they didn't play in the NBA, there's no place for them! No matter how many NBA players they have to see bomb horribly over the years. (Although they do well as a coaching farm team with Doc Rivers, Avery Johnson, Mark Jackson, etc.)

And the commentary teams just pile on. Kerr, Reggie, etc. seem to be having fun with it. JVG when he's not staring into the camera as if his soul is dead tries (by going insanely in the other direction) but it seems like everyone else just hates that he speaks his mind.

Actually, I should have just posted this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_Shootaround or this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_on_ESP ... E2.80.9303 They don't have any clue what to do and retool it every year.

Ernie, Chuck and Kenny have been the team since 2000 and even got the post-game show expanded to a full hour. And Chuck has been arrested how many times? ESPN would have fired him instantly. I don't pay all that much attention to NFL, but iirc when FOX finally got a contract they decided to go out and get the best of the other networks (James Brown, Howie Long, Terry Bradshaw, etc.) gave them an hour and freedom, stuck with it and blew the ratings out of the water. ESPN/ABC would seemingly have the ability to do this but they seem opposed to the idea. And then they wonder why their ratings are so shit in comparison to NBC and now even TNT.

And then I can get started on their camera angles like the primary one which is like four miles away from the court, and the fact they're insistent on missing at least one play a game by showing something irrelevant in the middle of play. Or why I don't get that they're even more afraid of being fined by the league than TNT is, unless it's something in the contract.

And what's the deal with seedless watermelon?

EDIT: Actually thinking about it, I think the Rose/Westbrook stuff of recent was a great example of the divide. On TNT you had Chuck bemoaning Westbrook and to some extent Rose for taking so many shots for a PG. Meanwhile, Kenny came at it from his own perspective as a guard that shot a lot, and Webber as guy who used a ton of possessions. (Not all of them well.) While Chuck's point was that there was a better more efficient player (even if it was never stated in these terms, although as an aside I think Chuck has a more empirical understanding of basketball than he'd be willing to admit in that he "sees" the game a lot like statfags do, he's always been big on possession distribution for one) in Westbrook's case and he was (likely from his own experience) more forgiving of Rose due to that. But both Kenny and Webber saw it more about doing it because you should or something. All of them had their point of view, all of them argued it coherently and rationally. I didn't see anything on ESPN like that, even from their own "legends" like Tim Legler and Jamal Mashburn. If they argue about anything it's pointless shit and thus zero passion. The TNT guys if they get into arguments it's about fundamental concepts of basketball and usually passion. They don't even really seem to care about the other stuff even when Ernie prods them. They tend to make fun of that stuff more than anything. And that's why it works.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby Killer Crossover aka OG on Mon May 23, 2011 12:34 am

@benji are you a Sports-Journalist or something like this :?: :oops:
User avatar
Killer Crossover aka OG
Your Mom is nice and the Daughter too *Mitsubishi Evo X*
 
Posts: 2178
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:09 am
Location: Raccoon City

Re: 2011 WCF: (3) Mavericks vs (4) Thunder

Postby benji on Mon May 23, 2011 12:37 am

No, I am an actual human being.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

PreviousNext

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests