Van Horn in Milwaukee

by **elwudl** on Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:26 am

Can someone tell me why Porter lets Mason start over Van Horn?

by . on Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:40 am

Imo Van Horn is better, but maybe Porter wants Michael Redd to be their scorer and whenever hes on the bench, then Van Horn can take it over from then. Just an idea, I didnt see a Bucks game yet this season so I really dont know what strategy they are using

by **fgrep15** on Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:01 am

Mason is a much much much better defender, and he is a killer in the open court, Milwaukee likes to run a fair bit, so Mason is better.

Van Horn is also their instant offense off the bench, he's averaging 19 points in Milwauke, so I don't see what the complain really is.

YouTube · by **mp3** on Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:15 am

Van Horn might come off the bench but will still play 30-35 minutes a game, 'fgrep15' hit the nail on the head with Mason been a better defender than Horn and also the fact that Porter likes having that spark off the bench which is just what there doing. 11 points 12 rebounds in tonights win which is just what they want from him.

<<<<< New York fan sad to see Van Horn gone :cry:

by **elwudl** on Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:32 am

It was no complain. I simply was wondering.

by **Bill Russell** on Mon Mar 01, 2004 5:42 pm

I see Van Horn starting at the 4 till season's end...

by **elwudl** on Tue Mar 02, 2004 3:36 am

But that is because Joe Smith is injured.

by **Ruff Ryder** on Tue Mar 02, 2004 9:47 am

Tales wrote:I see Van Horn starting at the 4 till season's end...

I dont think against Western Confrence teams.

Van Horn in Milwaukee

Van Horn in Milwaukee

Who is online