erik_twism wrote:I say that the Celtics should take marbury, he still is a good player and can give them help at the point. Furthermore I say that Marbury might accept the smaler role,he wants to show the Knicks that he´s still good and can fit in, he is not expected and not needed to be the go to guy, he´s in a position to win a ring with the Celtics and if he causes trouble it would be easy to cut him. So I don´t see a to big risk for the Celtics.
zanshadow wrote:Isn't this more unlikely to happen anyways? NYK needs to do something really quick, cuz i really can't wait to see him playing again ffs.
Clueminati017 wrote:To be honest... Besides, Shaun Livingston going to Phoenix. Maybe Steph needs to go back there and play right behind Nash. Although, that's going to be way over the cap space so who's willing to take him besides Boston?
Matthew wrote:A couple of things here. If Marbury doesn't play this season, will anyone take a chance on him next season? The only team that has publicly shown interest, Boston, will still have Rondo with another seasons worth or experience. I wonder what opportunities Marbury will have. He might end up in
Alejandrov011 wrote:Clueminati017 wrote:To be honest... Besides, Shaun Livingston going to Phoenix. Maybe Steph needs to go back there and play right behind Nash. Although, that's going to be way over the cap space so who's willing to take him besides Boston?
What?
Sorry... I just read that the Suns want Livingston, but it isn't done yet
Jackal wrote:I don't get Marbury, everyone else (around his age) is focussed on winning a ring and he doesn't seem to be the least bit bothered about it. Him not playing for so long and not making a fuss about it kinda says he plays basketball only for the money, not really because he likes the game or anything.
I really don't get him, he was/is a pretty talented guy on the court, so I really don't get it. Talentwise I'd love him on the Lakers because he seemed to have a certain swagger about him, but his attitude is just so off-putting it's not normal.
I mean we have our usual weirdos in Ron Artest, Dennis Rodman and the likes...[b]but atleast they gave a shit about the game. Marbury is just...weird.[/b]
When I was young. My father embedded me that in my mind. I need to win a ring, and that's how I wanted to play my life for. Just to get that ring because I have trophies, but I wanted that ring to prove it. Now, since I'm out of the league. I just realized that it's not about a ring. Just how you leave your legacy at.
Jackal wrote:I don't get Marbury, everyone else (around his age) is focussed on winning a ring and he doesn't seem to be the least bit bothered about it. Him not playing for so long and not making a fuss about it kinda says he plays basketball only for the money, not really because he likes the game or anything.
I really don't get him, he was/is a pretty talented guy on the court, so I really don't get it. Talentwise I'd love him on the Lakers because he seemed to have a certain swagger about him, but his attitude is just so off-putting it's not normal.
I mean we have our usual weirdos in Ron Artest, Dennis Rodman and the likes...but atleast they gave a shit about the game. Marbury is just...weird.
Jackal wrote:Maybe he's got bi-polar depression or something. That would explain the extreme "high" levels he seems to go on, don't know if he experiences lows though, that probably isn't as interesting to report in the media.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests