Colin wrote:"Lack of creativity at its worst"
![]()
That would imply they are doing a bad job...badly. Double negative....so you're saying those are good names?
Donatello wrote:Knickerbockers, actually. At the beginning of the 17th century, New York City was a small Dutch community located at the south end of Manhattan Island. History tells us that the people of New Amsterdam were canny traders and wore funny pants. A knickerbocker is a descendant of these original Dutch settlers. The term can also refer to anyone who lives in the city, hence the New York Knicks.
keepnitgangsta1 wrote:Why would any teams switch nicknames anyways. I mean does it really matter? A name is just a name and people already have grown accustomed to the New York Knicks, New Jersey Nets and so forth. They will not change the name unless an owner is really ignorant about it.
Unrestrict3D wrote:keepnitgangsta1 wrote:Why would any teams switch nicknames anyways. I mean does it really matter? A name is just a name and people already have grown accustomed to the New York Knicks, New Jersey Nets and so forth. They will not change the name unless an owner is really ignorant about it.
I'm fine with the majority of team nicknames. I've just always thought Jazz made no sense for a Utah nickname. The Jazz nickname belongs to New Orleans (just like it was originally) and Utah should come up with a new nickname. Utah has cougars, coyotoes, bobcats, eagles, squirrels, black bears, bison, mountain lions, and others. It wouldn't be too difficult to come up with a new nickname.
Rip32 wrote:Now the Starting line-up for your UTAH SQUIRRELS!
Jing wrote:heh my university Umass was thinking of changing their name to the Bobcats, SeaWolves, and Eagles... before they decided to keep with Minuteman
The Almighty wrote:good choice, why so many animal names??? There are other things then animals in this world!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests