Laddas_KB8 wrote:anywayz t-mac is too much of a sook anywayz
hes still letting his sore back get to him, man justp lay
kobe does when hes injured
if ya that good, a minor injury shouldnt really be much of a problem
anyway,
PoorCH wrote:tmac = can lead his team w/little help
kobe = nuthin w/o shaq![]()
but overall i would hav to say AI 8)
mkool8 wrote:So, you're saying that Kobe no longer has the potential to be really good? I believe that both of them still have the potential to improve even more.
Kobe does have the potential to improve. But you can't deny the fact that McGrady has MUCH more.
T_McGrady wrote:mkool8 wrote:So, you're saying that Kobe no longer has the potential to be really good? I believe that both of them still have the potential to improve even more.
Kobe does have the potential to improve. But you can't deny the fact that McGrady has MUCH more. I mean, how much had Kobe improved from last year? A few points, being less unselfish (although he sometimes still hogs the ball), and a few rebounds. McGrady? He's basically gone from a lower-ranked AllStar to the top player in the league in that same time.
Also, that thing about Kobe being able to lead a team, the losing streak they were in proved it. At that time, Orlando didn't have as great role players as LA, yet had a good record. LA without Shaq had an abysmal record. And the role Lakers would not magically turn into good followers when Shaq comes.
Laddas_KB8 wrote:shawn kemp(ex-all-star)
Laddas_KB8 wrote:kobe has....................................................ummmmmmmmmmmmm.........horry for the last 3mins..........and.......ahhhhhhhhh........maybe fisher................and uh, well fox occasionally
i rest my case
Dan Gadzuric wrote:Laddas_KB8 wrote:shawn kemp(ex-all-star)
That's right... ex-all-star, just like Vin Baker.Laddas_KB8 wrote:kobe has....................................................ummmmmmmmmmmmm.........horry for the last 3mins..........and.......ahhhhhhhhh........maybe fisher................and uh, well fox occasionally
i rest my case
Don't forget about that one guy...kinda big and dominating...
TheBob wrote:Laddas_KB8 wrote:mike miller(future star)
Ummm no....
Laddas_KB8 wrote:Ummm yes...
16ppg 5.8rpg 2.8apg .357% from d-town
22yrs old
i'd say he has talent to be
Laddas_KB8 wrote: and those numbers are better than any other role player on the lakers team
Well first of all he's the third option on his team behind Hill and Mcgrady.
He's 42nd in scoring, 50th in 3pt% and not in the top 50 of anything else that you listed.
Clinton wrote:Shouldn't that mean that he produces very well in his limited chances. With TMac and Hill, you don't really need another scorer. But Miller takes his chances and has some great games. If he was the first or second option on a team he would be a superstar, but for now he has to sit in the shadow of McGrady and Hill.
Mike Miller is third option for a reason
if Doc Rivers saw knew that he could do more than he does now than he would tell T-Mac and Hill to give him the ball more
ningtong88 wrote:Hehe yeah right... Shaq wouldn't win games for the Lakers.. while I'm sure Pat Burke would for the Magic
Did you watch Magic vs. Knicks, they played without T-mac, and they won, that proved without T-mac, Magic still can win.
I said Lakers wouldn't easily win a game without Kobe, that happened last season, when Kobe got suspended, but not yet this season, and you know why.
From last night's game Kobe proved he is better than T-mac, he scored 21 of his 27 points during 4th quarter, and with 9rebounds and 8assists. Don't say that Shaq is the only one carry the team. Magic got Mike Miller, Grant Hill, they both are all stars, why don't you say Mike Miller and Grant Hill also carrry the team?
By the way, from last night's great comeback game, Lakers are really back.
Laddas_KB8 wrote:TheBob wrote:Laddas_KB8 wrote:mike miller(future star)
Ummm no....
Ummm yes...
16ppg 5.8rpg 2.8apg .357% from d-town
22yrs old
i'd say he has talent to be
and those numbers are better than any other role player on the lakers team
Laddas_KB8 wrote:HHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
so ur sayin that shaq is a role player..........LOFL!!
okay then
shaq and kobe are a duo surrounded by role players
same goes for grant hill(wen healthy) and t-mac
y do u think wen i wasa comparing kobe and t-mac about leadership and help from role players i left out shaq and hill.
mike miller is a role player(second option wen hill is out)
and ur gonna tell me that his numbers arent better than any other laker role player???
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests