Kaman signs five-year $52.5 million deal

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Kaman signs five-year $52.5 million deal

Postby scrub on Sun Oct 29, 2006 4:03 am

WOW! I know Chris Kaman has had a good season but is he worth the $52.5 million he'll be getting over the next five years? They needed to re-sign but I wouldn't be willingto pay him over $10 million each year. I thought he would've been signed for around $7-8 million per year. Seems a pretty good year for anybody can get you a real big contract.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2641609
Corey Brewer - Defensive Player of the Year 08
Image
User avatar
scrub
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 3:05 am
Location: Belfast, Ireland

Postby sdude on Sun Oct 29, 2006 4:54 am

wow :shock: atleast now he can get a new haircut :mrgreen:
User avatar
sdude
 
Posts: 371
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:39 am
Location: Estonia

Postby Klayface on Sun Oct 29, 2006 5:07 am

At least Sterling is spending money to keep guys around. Good move in keeping Kaman, don't know if he was worth that much but the key to the Clips keeping up the success is keeping the same core around, Cassell doesn't really have to be kept around for more than another 2 years so Livingston can learn a few more tricks.
Image

What do you call a power forward that averages 7 rebounds?
A small forward.
User avatar
Klayface
 
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:56 pm
Location: Shaolin

Postby cyanide on Sun Oct 29, 2006 5:07 am

sdude wrote:wow :shock: atleast now he can get a new haircut :mrgreen:

:lol: Good one.

$10 million a year is a lot. He did have a pretty good season last year and he works hard. He's overpaid for sure, but who else isn't? A lot of other guys in the league are way overpaid, and that just seems to be the trend these days.
Last edited by cyanide on Sun Oct 29, 2006 5:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
User avatar
cyanide
Dat steatopygous
 
Posts: 9197
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
Location: US's toque

Postby [Q] on Sun Oct 29, 2006 5:10 am

^well he used that to his advantage, citing big men like Dalembert and Chandler
Image
User avatar
[Q]
NBA Live 18 Advocate
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 14396
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 8:20 am
Location: Westside, the best side

Postby maes on Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:35 am

If he continues to play at his level & continues to improve he's a bargain at $10M a year. The NBA salaries are within restrictions a free market governed by supply & demand, and legitimate 7' NBA centers are incredibly rare.

There's always some issue with Centers. They're undersized (sweetney, skinner), not strong enough, gets in foul trouble (chandler), can't run 35 minutes per game (virtually all of them), or are constantly injured (camby).

Kaman is 7', 265 lbs, plays 32 mpg, missed only 4 games last year. He's a steady 9.6 boards along with 11 points, and unlike other guys who have their rebounds stat padded because nobody else rebounds (cough Troy Murphy), Kaman gets his 9.6 boards competing with Brand every night. He's even commented on some nights his toughest competition is Brand, not the other Center.

His blocks per game stat doesn't jump out at you, but guys with a high BPG are weak side ambushers, like Kirilenko or G.Wallace. Kaman alters opposing shots with his height straight up, and altered shots is probably the most important stat never published.

A lot of people credit Brand for the Clips success, but he really hasn't done anything he hasn't done every year. The emergence of Kaman and replacing Jaric w/ Cassell are the two big factors. Brand + Kaman is about as good a big man duo as any in the league.
maes
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:58 am
Location: Chicago

Postby Laxation on Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:33 am

Youve gotta remember Kaman had a few games last season getting 20+20 (coupled with Brand getting something ridiculous like 40+20)

Sure, he wont do that every night, but its an indicator of what he can do, and will be able to do more often with experience.
Image
User avatar
Laxation
Just wants to Tri-Force
 
Posts: 4400
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby Gundy on Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:18 pm

Caveman's going to be an elite center in the league soon. I think it was wise of the Clippers to keep him satisfied.
User avatar
Gundy
 
Posts: 1601
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Postby The X on Sun Oct 29, 2006 3:45 pm

they definitely overpaid him, but looking at what Nene, Chandler & Dalembert get, the money he got is probably right....this deal just reaffirms my thought that Bogut will be a max contract player in a couple of years (not because he will be worth, just because of what other big's get)
User avatar
The X
is
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11499
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Fenix on Sun Oct 29, 2006 4:23 pm

I don't think he's being overpaid. I think both Chandler and Dalembert got more money and they both had some serious question marks surrounding them that Kaman certainly doesn't have (consistency, work ethic, durability, offensive skills). Not only he'd already be a 15/10 guy if he didn't play along someone like Brand, he's also young, hard working and has still ton of potential left. He could very well end up being a 15/10 guy playing with Brand, which is not an easy thing to do and is very valuable when coming from a true centre. How many guys are capable of doing that nowadays? Shaq, Yao, Duncan (I consider him to be a C), Dwight Howard and probably Bogut. Not exactly a lot of guys.
"Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team." (Scottie Pippen, #33)
User avatar
Fenix
There's no I in threesome
 
Posts: 3015
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:32 pm
Location: Slovenia

Postby joejam999 on Sun Oct 29, 2006 5:40 pm

sdude wrote:wow :shock: atleast now he can get a new haircut :mrgreen:


You didnt like the Skullet? :lol:
User avatar
joejam999
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 7:40 am
Location: Utah

Postby sdude on Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:41 pm

joejam999 wrote:
sdude wrote:wow :shock: atleast now he can get a new haircut :mrgreen:


You didnt like the Skullet? :lol:

http://www.deadspin.com/sports/nba/chris-kaman-even-weirder-than-you-think-143980.php
http://www.stat.ucla.edu/~joshchang/ :wall:
User avatar
sdude
 
Posts: 371
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:39 am
Location: Estonia

Postby Axel on Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:56 am

Kaman's stats toward the end of the year were much better than what his season long statistics are. He started the year out very slowly, but around late December, he was putting up a double double every night. I wouldnt be surprised to see him average close to 15 ppg this year and continue to improve on the rebounds. Another positive about Kaman is his free throw shooting. He's much better than most 7 footers.. I believe he hit 30 in a row at one point last season.

If he can stay healthy, he'll definetly be worth the money.
User avatar
Axel
 
Posts: 2853
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:46 am
Location: North Carolina

Postby Klayface on Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:42 am

Go Paper Clips. Kamans still young and hes proven he can step up. If you look at the market for big men, not much to look at. Finding a 7 foot guy is hard to do, finding one that can play ball is harder.
Image

What do you call a power forward that averages 7 rebounds?
A small forward.
User avatar
Klayface
 
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:56 pm
Location: Shaolin

Postby KIG1 on Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:49 am

Kaman doesnt deserve all this money yet. He didn't even play very good the first half of the season.
User avatar
KIG1
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

Postby Ty-Land on Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:29 pm

The X wrote:they definitely overpaid him, but looking at what Nene, Chandler & Dalembert get, the money he got is probably right....this deal just reaffirms my thought that Bogut will be a max contract player in a couple of years (not because he will be worth, just because of what other big's get)


Couldn't agree more. I was going to say the same thing about Bogut. If he can perform this year, say average around 14/8.5/2.5 then he will be lining himself up a big big contract. It's sad the lack of quality big men in the league right now means guys like Chandler and Dalembert are getting big money but would have been, in my opinion, bench players in the 90's.
User avatar
Ty-Land
Spacewolf
 
Posts: 1467
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 4:56 pm
Location: Victoria, Australia

Postby nets4life on Mon Oct 30, 2006 6:01 pm

good on kaman he deserves it more than both nene and chandler. Man that 2003 draft class is insane
Image
User avatar
nets4life
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Postby theflash02 on Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:39 am

kaman is gonna be a great player.. not only a good player but a great player.. hes not gonna be an all star or a superstar.. but hes gonna be a great player coz he does what everycenter should be doing..

disrupting and altering shots
blocking shots
intimidation
offensive rebounds
explosiveness (sometimes)
post strength
defense
post offense
and defensive rebounds

im glad he had been overpaid because if he wasnt.. his potential wouldve done a downward spiral coz he functions well with the LAC.. But if he was traded.. or signed with another team..

he could function that well..

its good that LAC decided to tandem Brand and Kaman..

Its really effective..
Image
"Never Back Down From Anything"
---------------------------------------------
Special Thanks to WL Sniper for the sig
*****COURTNEY IS MY SUPERHERO*****
User avatar
theflash02
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:44 pm
Location: Philippines


Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mp3 and 5 guests