crawford4MIP4real wrote:the bulls biggest need is a SF who can hit the perimeter shot. they can do better in another deal if they choose to trade the pick
Andrew wrote: Even though I'd rather the Bulls keep the pick, it certainly would be worth trading it if they could get a great deal. I definitely do not think this scenario is the right deal.
Andrew wrote:As far as a trade goes, I'd include the third pick in a deal that landed a young (though established) star player; say, Kevin Garnett. That's not too realistic, though. I can't come up with any other scenarios at the moment.
I like the idea of taking Deng with the third pick, even with the history of the Duke curse and his numbers are solid, but not necessarily spectacular.
"We could make it work, absolutely," Pacers CEO Donnie Walsh said Tuesday. "I have spoken to somebody in their organization, and I sensed there was interest there. What they're telling me is, there's a good chance he's going to be traded. So, yeah, a player like that out there, we're definitely going to be interested."
How to do it?
McGrady's salary cap number is around $14.5 million. The Pacers would have to send Orlando players whose combined salaries fall within 15 percent of that number. So it's like this: Start with Al Harrington ($6.3 million), who will get traded in the media no fewer than 50 times this summer. Then it's an issue of deciding who that second player might be.
Jonathan Bender ($6.5 million)? That would be my preference, but it might not be Orlando's choice.
Ron Artest ($6.2 million)? That would be hard to swallow, but for McGrady, it's a deal I'd make, however grudgingly.
It's a price worth paying to have the Shaq-and-Kobe of the East.
The Pacers are interested in McGrady, and should be interested in McGrady. And Walsh made it clear Tuesday, he and Larry Bird are willing to move anybody except O'Neal if it means making a deal that catapults them past Detroit.
"Is anybody untouchable?" Walsh was asked.
"No," he said. "No one. Except Jermaine. He's our franchise player."
Not Artest?
"No," Walsh said.
Not Bender?
"No."
Redbulls wrote:There is only 1 guy the Bulls should keep their eye on and thats T-mac. You land T-mac and the Bulls are back on the map. We need a franchise player not a good or above average player. We couldn't get T-mac the first time because of that fat fuck Krause but now the front office is a bit different. Give the magic Crawford,the number 3 and throw in Eddie Robinson.
Andrew wrote:Could Deng be the offensive minded small forward the Bulls need though? I was looking at his statistics and 15 ppg is certainly solid, though a little modest. He seems to shoot a nice percentage though, and his scouting report (taken from this profile) suggests he has pretty good range, too.
So if the Bulls hold on to the third pick, I think Deng would be the best option. At least, I'm inclined to think that way, unless there's something else I should know.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests