The "What team should I use?" question thread.

by **Fresh8** on Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:28 pm

Thierry, go with New Orleans

dada, i hope the game wont be that easy :lol:

And nets4life, go with maybe... the Bobcats... Adam Morrison. Or New Orleans... Chris Paul (Close enough to a rookie). Or Portland... they got a ton of young guys... Aldridge and Roy are good... plus all the other young dudes like Webster, Rodriguez, Juanny Dixon

and dont forget Przybilla!!!

by **---** on Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:31 pm

Would anyone like to see a Memphis dynasty? I wanna do one but im not to sure on when I will get the game

by **nets4life** on Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:35 pm

12th October if you get it on first day in NZ, yea a memphis dynasty would be sweet. Make Gasol a beast, develop Gay, and try and salvage Swift's career

by **Fresh8** on Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:38 pm

Flite, Memphis would be aight... lol, reminds me of Mafia

by **---** on Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:41 pm

Im doing it coz Swift is back, pau is white, and rudy gays in town

by **Marquis** on Thu Sep 21, 2006 9:22 pm

Thierry, what about your plans to make Spurs Dnasty, heh?? But if you are choosing between these teams, I suggest you to pick Wizards.

What do you guys want from me? I'm thinking of a weak one..

by **Fresh8** on Thu Sep 21, 2006 9:36 pm

Atlanta Hawks, then trade for Marquis Daniels

Since you didn't like the Hawks, what about the Bobcats? Utah Jazz sounds fun and will test if the sim engine is realistic... (Concerning whether Andrei Kirilenko will get injured all the time

)

by **nets4life** on Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:34 am

@ Marquis, i wouldve suggested Portland but that seems to be the most popular and most common dynasty so far. Minnesota and Philly arent reallly weak but theyr not performing to their potential. I'd pick Charlotte Bobcats (Y)

by **kibaxx7** on Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:36 am

Doing this until I get my 07.

- Indiana (1)
- New Orleans / Oklahoma City (1)
- Seattle (2)
- Washington (1)

by **Keo** on Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:58 am

Thierry, I say go with the Hornets. They've improved significantly over the off-season and should be a really fun team to play with.

by **Gundy** on Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:25 pm

Thierry³ wrote:Doing this until I get my 07.

- Indiana (1)
- New Orleans / Oklahoma City (1)
- Seattle (2)
- Washington (1)

I think you should choose New Orleans / Oklahoma City because Chris Paul as well as David West (Xavier represent!) are up and coming stars in this league.

by **jerry** on Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:50 pm

How bout this..
everybody use
Raptors
Bulls
Rockets
cool

by **kibaxx7** on Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:00 am

Doing this until I get my 07.

- Indiana (1)
- New Orleans / Oklahoma City (3)
- Seattle (2)
- Washington (1)

by **Chris.** on Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:21 am

Make that four for New Orleans, they get my vote too

by **[C][B]#4** on Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:07 am

Makes that 5 for New Orleans Hornets. With Chris Paul running the show, there's bound to be lot's of fast break points, but the Hornets can also slow it down and play their half court game. It's a pretty well balanced team offensively.

by **Wade=Jordan** on Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:31 am

What is the worst possible team to pick? I mean no cap room, bad or no talent, and declining players.

I like to take the worst teams and prove my management savvy.

by **nets4life** on Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:39 am

lol the knicks, but they got talent yet they dont use it

by **Fresh8** on Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:50 am

Wade=Jordan wrote:What is the worst possible team to pick? I mean no cap room, bad or no talent, and declining players.

- As nets4life said, the Knicks. They have talent and in NBA Live, they might be good. You never know but in reality and thinking logically, it would be hard for a team like theirs to not be dysfunctional. It will be itneresting to see how they do with Thomas as coach. Anyhow, in relation to your question, the knicks pop into mind first.

I can't think of any other teams though... what about the Sixers? Chris Webbers got a huge contract, same with Iverson and the team isn't really going into any type of general direction as I see it. Iverson is getting there in age and Webber's knee blew him out ages ago... Philadelphia perhaps then?

by **nets4life** on Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:33 am

@ Thierry , ill be different, do an Indiana Pacers dynasty. Make Granger an all star (shouldnt be too hard since they over rated him), and make Harrington and O'Neal the best front court duo since Robinson and Duncan (Y)

by **funk99** on Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:13 pm

Sit wrote:
Wade=Jordan wrote:What is the worst possible team to pick? I mean no cap room, bad or no talent, and declining players.

- As nets4life said, the Knicks. They have talent and in NBA Live, they might be good. You never know but in reality and thinking logically, it would be hard for a team like theirs to not be dysfunctional. It will be itneresting to see how they do with Thomas as coach. Anyhow, in relation to your question, the knicks pop into mind first.

I can't think of any other teams though... what about the Sixers? Chris Webbers got a huge contract, same with Iverson and the team isn't really going into any type of general direction as I see it. Iverson is getting there in age and Webber's knee blew him out ages ago... Philadelphia perhaps then?

Yes and im pretty sure that they are going to have a bad team chemistry rating