Talk about NBA Live 07 here.
Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:45 pm
hehehe i hope they.. i just got a new pc.. and my dual core pentium 3ghz cpu and Nvidia 7900gt is waiting for something to test it.
Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:57 pm
BoLLo wrote:tracywtfacy wrote:BoLLo wrote:i have waiting GeForce 5200 Ultra 2.8 Ghz waiting and i'm going to buy minimum 1 gb ram

your other specs are ok but you'll probly hav to play at lower resolutions with a fx5200...
so any word on a release date for the pc version? does it come out for all the platforms at different times, or the same? god i can't wait, sick of 06 now... there's no mention of '07 on the easports website...
why ? i have 256 mb on this card

to this day every game are on maximum details and it works very good
what games exactly are those? have you tried GRAW?FEAR?COD2? no way can an FX card play these games on max.
RAM isnt the key baby, its the chipset.
for 07, im thinking it should set its reqs at 128mb6600 at minumum.. that way, graphics would really be nice
Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:01 pm
[L3]1101 wrote:Yea that pretty much tells it, if you can run Live on a fx5200, EA really needs to make improvments on the graphics side. Fx5200 is at least 3-4 years old and when it came out, it was supposed to be a mid-range card. I had one before, and it ran decently, but had to replace it not long after. I'm really hoping to take advantage of my 7800GT and Opteron 165 before they become old.
exact;y my point.. i upgraded my PC not long ago to play live, the thing is, i have to install more demanding games to make use of my upgrade.. live 2005/06 doesnt benefit gtom my XP2600+512RAM+9600XT to 643000(oc)+1024RAM+7600GT upgrade
not that were exactly asking for live to up the miniumum drastically ( dont mind myprevious post, i was high) but to push the max settings to give justice to current technology...
Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:09 pm
No need to double post, could've just edited your first post.
Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:07 am
I guess we'll just have to wait and see. I have a GeForce Go 7800 GTX, with 2GB of RAM, and a dual-core processor in my laptop, and much much better looking games can be run easily on my laptop (Oblivion, FEAR, Half-Life2, COD2) at near max settings. I know most of those are either FPS, or RPG games, but they all are on par and better than next-gen Live, graphics wise.
It's time.
Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:16 pm
Time for what?
Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:05 pm
Jae wrote:Time for what?
"Next Gen" graphics, if you want to call it that.
Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:51 pm
men i hope my graphics card can run the 07 ... FX 5500 256 mb
Sun Jun 11, 2006 2:46 am
Bird123 wrote:Jae wrote:Time for what?
"Next Gen" graphics, if you want to call it that.
lo.. i didnt get the "its time" line too
Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:56 pm
Bird123 wrote:I guess we'll just have to wait and see. I have a GeForce Go 7800 GTX, with 2GB of RAM, and a dual-core processor in my laptop, and much much better looking games can be run easily on my laptop (Oblivion, FEAR, Half-Life2, COD2) at near max settings. I know most of those are either FPS, or RPG games, but they all are on par and better than next-gen Live, graphics wise.
It's time.
Agreed totally. I am psyched for any Live 07 PC announcements, especially waiting for confirmation that is will be using their next-gen techs.
For those wondering what most people are -really- runnning [no rig-padding!], Valve ran their
surveys earlier this year with some interesting results. And with the AMD/Intel price wars later this Summer/ Fall there is no reason not to at least pick up a badass CPU. Heck, go broke and build a whole new comp. ;]
*forgot the linkage!
Thu Jun 29, 2006 4:19 pm
i have a powerful PC, but i could care less if the game looks just like 06. Just as long as they fix the AI.
Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:08 pm
from the marketing point of view - they'd most probably add more spice and glamour features to be able to sell and attract new players.
But the priority would be to support the majority of pcs (implying support for low end PCs - w/c is actually the majority, not the high end ones). This though, unfortunately means, don't do any major overhaul.

(Notice that there is no new platform every year.)
Of course, the high end pcs are still good part of the market share. So they'll add a dab here and there just enough to make us want for more. But bottomline is make the game playable for the market that will translate to more $$$. It's like the Blizzard mentality. make the game playable for the low end PCs, and playable for 5-10 years. hehe.
hopefully though, i hope they address issues of the loyal fanbase of this series. w/c usually comes up w/ the same qualms and gripes every year.
Sat Jul 01, 2006 3:35 am
Im waiting for them to do this too
i have 1gb ram
and a 512 vid card with 12 pixel pipelines and 700Mhz
so Oh yeah
Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:05 am
you have 4 gigs of ram?
Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:34 am
yap, sadly only 3gig is what the xp pro supports

, im waiting for the 64bit edition of Windows
Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:56 am
stepback3 wrote:yap, sadly only 3gig is what the xp pro supports

, im waiting for the 64bit edition of Windows
I didnt think that was possible either. Do they make 2gig single ddr cards because i thought you could only have 2 ddr slots on any mobo.
Sat Jul 08, 2006 6:58 pm
Big-D wrote:stepback3 wrote:yap, sadly only 3gig is what the xp pro supports

, im waiting for the 64bit edition of Windows
I didnt think that was possible either. Do they make 2gig single ddr cards because i thought you could only have 2 ddr slots on any mobo.
i have an asus a8n sli premium, it has 4 slots, upto 4 gb of ram
Sun Jul 09, 2006 4:02 am
32 bit windows support up to 4gb of ram
Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:23 pm
This may have already been stated my apoligies if I missed it.
I'd be surprised if the graphics took a big leap in '07 for the PC.
It doesn't make much sense for EA to do so. Direct X 9 is still the standard, and direct X 10 - which completely breaks from past versions - won't hit a mass market threshold by the time '07 releases if it's even out by then. To spend a great deal of resources on the graphics engine for PC gaming only to have to completely revamp it again once D10 comes out just doesn't make much sense. By '08 64 bit architecture will have a far greater foothold, and windows Vista should be out by then and DX 10 should have enough market penetration to justify the resources spent in revamping the series to take advantage of the new tools they'll be given.
Here's hoping they focus on fixing all the bugs and improving the gameplay in '07 so that they won't be spread so thin with thier resources revamping the engine and trying to fix the gameplay at the same time in '08.
YCS
Sun Jul 09, 2006 5:38 pm
My old rig:
Athlon XP2500+ @1.8
MSI GeForce Ti 4200 64 MB
My current rig:
AMD Opteron 165 @1.8
XFX 6800 Xtreme 256 MB DDR3
Last night I played Nba Live 06 in my new rig and guess what? I didn't see any improvement whatsover as far as graphics is concerned. what a fucking game EA is producing.
Mon Jul 10, 2006 12:30 am
beau_boy04 wrote:My old rig:
Athlon XP2500+ @1.8
MSI GeForce Ti 4200 64 MB
My current rig:
AMD Opteron 165 @1.8
XFX 6800 Xtreme 256 MB DDR3
Last night I played Nba Live 06 in my new rig and guess what? I didn't see any improvement whatsover as far as graphics is concerned. what a fucking game EA is producing.
1. your opteron is not beeing clocked nowhere near where it should be, at least 2.4ghz default vcore, even though it may get easily to 2.7, 2.8 without sweating it.
2. 6800xt is a half decent card, as mid-range as it gets. it's gonna bottleneck your system like crazy in newer games, but in old games like nba live you can pretty much apply any type of filters to improve image quality (anisotropic - antialiasing) or increase the resolution.
Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:20 am
wicked waway wrote:32 bit windows support up to 4gb of ram
yap it supports, but when u right click the "my computer" cion then properties, it said 3gig only
Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:20 am
Why do you have so much ram. After 2 gigs its really the proccessor and video card and hard drive that make the difference. No games out there are demanding enough for that much ram.
Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:22 am
wicked waway wrote:well i hope they do... '06 was a let down tech wise for me.. (not that im bragging as my rig isnt high end) but its a waste of pc power when the game still runs smooth playing it at 1280X1024 highest details 8xsAA and 16AF and still getting 100+ fps.. i hoe they address this as issue as i believe most PC users now have decent rigs.
who are they catering to? celeron owners with integrated video? people with those setups are ofice users. gamers pack power in their pcs
I like this guy. I hope they make it powerfull also for those of us with high end rigs.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.