CPU speed matches or not

Talk about NBA Live 06 here.

CPU speed matches or not

Postby T-MAC-power on Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:40 am

I was playing 06 with Celeron 1.7 and then i got Pentium 2.4 GHZ processor. At first sight, there was a incresement for game performance but then I HAD TO decrease details because there wasn't a syncronization between graphics...

This issue is like that F1 2002, another EA Sports game.
Both of the systems has the same graphic card GeForce 4 Mx440, old card.

I mean, if i upgraded my CPU, why do i have to decrease graphic level???

I think graphic card cannot render as fast as CPU?

Thanks.
TRACY McGRADY won't be denied!
User avatar
T-MAC-power
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:54 am
Location: Turkey

Postby MetalHead on Sun Jan 29, 2006 6:56 am

You see, your problem is simply your video card. Your processor doesn't have (much) of a hand in the graphics department. Go to your local computer store and talk to them for a good video card fix for you rig. (Y)
User avatar
MetalHead
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:47 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Postby T-MAC-power on Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:07 am

I know Intel P4 2.4 GHZ nearly kills Celeron 1.7, but then CPU supplies more oppurtunities to render, to display better graphics, but graphic card's speed (old GeForce 4 MX440) doesn't allow to syncronize...

So i had to decrease detail level to get syncronized graphic performance...

I must confess that P4 2.4 makes 06 much smoother than Celeron 1.7 GHZ. But in the other hand, graphic card is important as much as CPU.
Am i right?
TRACY McGRADY won't be denied!
User avatar
T-MAC-power
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:54 am
Location: Turkey

Postby threatlockz on Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:17 am

get a better graphics card :)
tech-related questions can be mailed to threatlockz@gmail.com
User avatar
threatlockz
 
Posts: 958
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:49 pm

Postby T-MAC-power on Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:24 pm

Yeah, hardware compatibility of PC for gaming is too complex. What do you say about console such as PS2 maybe PS3 in future?
TRACY McGRADY won't be denied!
User avatar
T-MAC-power
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:54 am
Location: Turkey

Postby Num33Baller on Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:04 am

T-MAC-power wrote:Yeah, hardware compatibility of PC for gaming is too complex. What do you say about console such as PS2 maybe PS3 in future?


Not really.

You just need to read the bottom of the box first and see if you meet the requirements.

Kinda like buying a game for the N64 that requires a rumblepak, but you don't have one.
Num33Baller
 
Posts: 588
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:27 am

Postby MetalHead on Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:38 am

Num33Baller wrote:
T-MAC-power wrote:Yeah, hardware compatibility of PC for gaming is too complex. What do you say about console such as PS2 maybe PS3 in future?


Not really.

You just need to read the bottom of the box first and see if you meet the requirements.

Kinda like buying a game for the N64 that requires a rumblepak, but you don't have one.


Wrongo. System reqs. simply provide the hypothesized hardware requirements to run the game. This doesn't mean to run the game at maximum detail and maximum resolution. Its the bare minimum, and by bare, I mean BARE. And T-MAC, don't go near the PS2; there's no point. The game runs at a lower resolution on the PS2 and XBOX and besides, you can't install add-ons like updated rosters and jerseys. But in case of the PS3? Let's wait and see if the price doesn't reach the 4 digits.
User avatar
MetalHead
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:47 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Postby T-MAC-power on Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:37 am

Yeah, but EA's system reqs are too unrealistic...

Even you can configure fast enough system by experiences...

Yeah, PS2 cannot present updates, but it presents a REGULAR performance...
TRACY McGRADY won't be denied!
User avatar
T-MAC-power
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:54 am
Location: Turkey


Return to NBA Live 06

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests