How can the SA Spurs be ranked 26th in the latest roster!

Discussion about NBA Live 2003.

How can the SA Spurs be ranked 26th in the latest roster!

Postby MCalca1706 on Sat May 17, 2003 8:21 pm

Why are the NBA Live Rosters so out of touch with reality?
Why are the Spurs, one of the best teams in the league, always ranked in the mid twenties or lower?

Not only has this game lost all sense of realism but it seems that so have the roster updates!

This is the team that just beat the Lakers and will probably become champions again (because of Chris Webber's injury).

Could we please have some realistic rosters with close to the real thing team rankings?

Thank You
M. Calcagno
MCalca1706
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 4:49 pm
Location: NY. USA

Postby Colin on Sun May 18, 2003 6:00 am

ratings are ALWAYS messed up, always have been, always will be. If you'll notice the default roster has Vancouver at 13th or 14th I believe.
C#
Image
Pretty Flaco
User avatar
Colin
 
Posts: 5913
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 7:02 am
Location: Van-City

Postby Andrew on Sun May 18, 2003 1:50 pm

First of all, this section is for gripes about the game, not issues with the roster patch. Please use the appropriate section to provide feedback about the NLSC rosters.

As I explained in my email, it's difficult to get the overall team rankings realistic without making players overrated and underrated - especially during the season, when players go on the injured list. I will try to find a balance when I'm fixing up the ratings this offseason.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115162
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia


Return to NBA Live 2003

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests